Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by per1234, CommunityBot, gre_gor, jose can u c, MatsK
added 8 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Michel Keijzers
  • 13k
  • 7
  • 43
  • 59

log Log vs linear pots and the arduino

Hi I have noticed that when I used a log pot from a guitar amp I found, it gives janky results when using it in a motor PWM sketch, but if I use it in a fade sketch, it works. why does log pots give sketchy results when using them in a PWM control sketch, like when using the map()map() function?

log vs linear pots and the arduino

Hi I have noticed that when I used a log pot from a guitar amp I found, it gives janky results when using it in a motor PWM sketch, but if I use it in a fade sketch, it works. why does log pots give sketchy results when using them in a PWM control sketch, like when using the map()?

Log vs linear pots and the arduino

I have noticed that when I used a log pot from a guitar amp I found, it gives janky results when using it in a motor PWM sketch, but if I use it in a fade sketch, it works. why does log pots give sketchy results when using them in a PWM control sketch, like when using the map() function?

Source Link
Jim
  • 31
  • 2
  • 2
  • 9

log vs linear pots and the arduino

Hi I have noticed that when I used a log pot from a guitar amp I found, it gives janky results when using it in a motor PWM sketch, but if I use it in a fade sketch, it works. why does log pots give sketchy results when using them in a PWM control sketch, like when using the map()?