| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a type has nullptr as tp_dealloc, there apply different defaults.
Static types had object_dealloc as default, while new heaptypes
created with type_new have subtype_dealloc as default.
A problem was now that PyType_FromSpec also has
subtype_dealloc as default. But that is wrong, because a type that
was written with the static type approach is already written with
object_dealloc in mind and takes somehow care about further issues
with that type.
When we now convert this type and suddenly use subtype_dealloc
instead of object_dealloc, things get pretty wrong.
Finding that out was pretty hard and took quite long to understand.
The fix was then very easy and is the best proof:
Replacing our former (wrong) solution of supplying an
SbkDummyDealloc with a function object_dealloc works perfectly,
and the leakage completely vanished.
The documentation now is also corrected.
Task-number: PYSIDE-832
Change-Id: Ifc20c28172eb5663cd5e60dac52e0a43acfb626c
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While trying to document the Limited API Project,
it suddenly struck me:
We can make the patch much much simpler and implement it
without the necessity to have an extra PepType!
Now I am happy to continue the documentation, because
it is now no more improvable.
This version will last as long as the layout of
PyTypeObject does not change substantially. When that
happens, then we need to rewrite stuff with the according
PyType_GetSlot() access functions.
These access functions will until then be complete enough
so that we can live without the tricks like inventing a reduced
PyTypeObject as was done in the current implementation.
Task-number: PYSIDE-560
Change-Id: I49849cc377baa6794a5b53292691e21d6e2853ab
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the condensed checkin of 18 commits which created
the implementation of PEP 384.
Task-number: PYSIDE-560
Change-Id: I834c659af4c2b55b268f8e8dc4cfa53f02502409
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removing the word 'project' from all the headers,
and changing the PySide reference from the examples
to Qt for Python:
The following line was used inside the source/ and
build_scripts/ directory:
for i in $(grep -r "the Qt for Python project" * |grep -v "pyside2-tools" | awk '{print $1}' | sed 's/:.*//g');do sed -i 's/the\ Qt\ for\ Python\ project/Qt\ for\ Python/g' $i;done
and the following line was used inside the examples/ directory:
for i in $(grep -r "of the PySide" * |grep -v "pyside2-tools" | awk '{print $1}' | sed 's/:.*//g');do sed -i 's/of\ the\ PySide/of\ the\ Qt\ for\ Python/g' $i;done
Change-Id: Ic480714686ad62ac4d81c670f87f1c2033d4ffa1
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Alex Blasche <alexander.blasche@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When referring to the project one should use "Qt for Python"
and for the module "PySide2"
Change-Id: I36497df245c9f6dd60d6e160e2fc805e48cefcae
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
|
|
in preparation for a subtree merge.
this should not be necessary to do in a separate commit, but git is a
tad stupid about following history correctly without it.
|