aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/commit-graph.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-01-25Merge branch 'ma/more-opaque-lock-file'Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Code clean-up. * ma/more-opaque-lock-file: read-cache: try not to peek into `struct {lock_,temp}file` refs/files-backend: don't peek into `struct lock_file` midx: don't peek into `struct lock_file` commit-graph: don't peek into `struct lock_file` builtin/gc: don't peek into `struct lock_file`
2021-01-21refs: switch peel_ref() to peel_iterated_oid()Jeff King1-1/+1
The peel_ref() interface is confusing and error-prone: - it's typically used by ref iteration callbacks that have both a refname and oid. But since they pass only the refname, we may load the ref value from the filesystem again. This is inefficient, but also means we are open to a race if somebody simultaneously updates the ref. E.g., this: int some_ref_cb(const char *refname, const struct object_id *oid, ...) { if (!peel_ref(refname, &peeled)) printf("%s peels to %s", oid_to_hex(oid), oid_to_hex(&peeled); } could print nonsense. It is correct to say "refname peels to..." (you may see the "before" value or the "after" value, either of which is consistent), but mentioning both oids may be mixing before/after values. Worse, whether this is possible depends on whether the optimization to read from the current iterator value kicks in. So it is actually not possible with: for_each_ref(some_ref_cb); but it _is_ possible with: head_ref(some_ref_cb); which does not use the iterator mechanism (though in practice, HEAD should never peel to anything, so this may not be triggerable). - it must take a fully-qualified refname for the read_ref_full() code path to work. Yet we routinely pass it partial refnames from callbacks to for_each_tag_ref(), etc. This happens to work when iterating because there we do not call read_ref_full() at all, and only use the passed refname to check if it is the same as the iterator. But the requirements for the function parameters are quite unclear. Instead of taking a refname, let's instead take an oid. That fixes both problems. It's a little funny for a "ref" function not to involve refs at all. The key thing is that it's optimizing under the hood based on having access to the ref iterator. So let's change the name to make it clear why you'd want this function versus just peel_object(). There are two other directions I considered but rejected: - we could pass the peel information into the each_ref_fn callback. However, we don't know if the caller actually wants it or not. For packed-refs, providing it is essentially free. But for loose refs, we actually have to peel the object, which would be wasteful in most cases. We could likewise pass in a flag to the callback indicating whether the peeled information is known, but that complicates those callbacks, as they then have to decide whether to manually peel themselves. Plus it requires changing the interface of every callback, whether they care about peeling or not, and there are many of them. - we could make a function to return the peeled value of the current iterated ref (computing it if necessary), and BUG() otherwise. I.e.: int peel_current_iterated_ref(struct object_id *out); Each of the current callers is an each_ref_fn callback, so they'd mostly be happy. But: - we use those callbacks with functions like head_ref(), which do not use the iteration code. So we'd need to handle the fallback case there, anyway. - it's possible that a caller would want to call into generic code that sometimes is used during iteration and sometimes not. This encapsulates the logic to do the fast thing when possible, and fallback when necessary. The implementation is mostly obvious, but I want to call out a few things in the patch: - the test-tool coverage for peel_ref() is now meaningless, as it all collapses to a single peel_object() call (arguably they were pretty uninteresting before; the tricky part of that function is the fast-path we see during iteration, but these calls didn't trigger that). I've just dropped it entirely, though note that some other tests relied on the tags we created; I've moved that creation to the tests where it matters. - we no longer need to take a ref_store parameter, since we'd never look up a ref now. We do still rely on a global "current iterator" variable which _could_ be kept per-ref-store. But in practice this is only useful if there are multiple recursive iterations, at which point the more appropriate solution is probably a stack of iterators. No caller used the actual ref-store parameter anyway (they all call the wrapper that passes the_repository). - the original only kicked in the optimization when the "refname" pointer matched (i.e., not string comparison). We do likewise with the "oid" parameter here, but fall back to doing an actual oideq() call. This in theory lets us kick in the optimization more often, though in practice no current caller cares. It should never be wrong, though (peeling is a property of an object, so two refs pointing to the same object would peel identically). - the original took care not to touch the peeled out-parameter unless we found something to put in it. But no caller cares about this, and anyway, it is enforced by peel_object() itself (and even in the optimized iterator case, that's where we eventually end up). We can shorten the code and avoid an extra copy by just passing the out-parameter through the stack. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-reach: use corrected commit dates in paint_down_to_common()Abhishek Kumar1-0/+14
091f4cf (commit: don't use generation numbers if not needed, 2018-08-30) changed paint_down_to_common() to use commit dates instead of generation numbers v1 (topological levels) as the performance regressed on certain topologies. With generation number v2 (corrected commit dates) implemented, we no longer have to rely on commit dates and can use generation numbers. For example, the command `git merge-base v4.8 v4.9` on the Linux repository walks 167468 commits, taking 0.135s for committer date and 167496 commits, taking 0.157s for corrected committer date respectively. While using corrected commit dates, Git walks nearly the same number of commits as commit date, the process is slower as for each comparision we have to access a commit-slab (for corrected committer date) instead of accessing struct member (for committer date). This change incidentally broke the fragile t6404-recursive-merge test. t6404-recursive-merge sets up a unique repository where all commits have the same committer date without a well-defined merge-base. While running tests with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH unset, we use committer date as a heuristic in paint_down_to_common(). 6404.1 'combined merge conflicts' merges commits in the order: - Merge C with B to form an intermediate commit. - Merge the intermediate commit with A. With GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1, we write a commit-graph and subsequently use the corrected committer date, which changes the order in which commits are merged: - Merge A with B to form an intermediate commit. - Merge the intermediate commit with C. While resulting repositories are equivalent, 6404.4 'virtual trees were processed' fails with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1 as we are selecting different merge-bases and thus have different object ids for the intermediate commits. As this has already causes problems (as noted in 859fdc0 (commit-graph: define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH, 2018-08-29)), we disable commit graph within t6404-recursive-merge. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: use generation v2 only if entire chain doesAbhishek Kumar1-2/+28
Since there are released versions of Git that understand generation numbers in the commit-graph's CDAT chunk but do not understand the GDAT chunk, the following scenario is possible: 1. "New" Git writes a commit-graph with the GDAT chunk. 2. "Old" Git writes a split commit-graph on top without a GDAT chunk. If each layer of split commit-graph is treated independently, as it was the case before this commit, with Git inspecting only the current layer for chunk_generation_data pointer, commits in the lower layer (one with GDAT) whould have corrected commit date as their generation number, while commits in the upper layer would have topological levels as their generation. Corrected commit dates usually have much larger values than topological levels. This means that if we take two commits, one from the upper layer, and one reachable from it in the lower layer, then the expectation that the generation of a parent is smaller than the generation of a child would be violated. It is difficult to expose this issue in a test. Since we _start_ with artificially low generation numbers, any commit walk that prioritizes generation numbers will walk all of the commits with high generation number before walking the commits with low generation number. In all the cases I tried, the commit-graph layers themselves "protect" any incorrect behavior since none of the commits in the lower layer can reach the commits in the upper layer. This issue would manifest itself as a performance problem in this case, especially with something like "git log --graph" since the low generation numbers would cause the in-degree queue to walk all of the commits in the lower layer before allowing the topo-order queue to write anything to output (depending on the size of the upper layer). Therefore, When writing the new layer in split commit-graph, we write a GDAT chunk only if the topmost layer has a GDAT chunk. This guarantees that if a layer has GDAT chunk, all lower layers must have a GDAT chunk as well. Rewriting layers follows similar approach: if the topmost layer below the set of layers being rewritten (in the split commit-graph chain) exists, and it does not contain GDAT chunk, then the result of rewrite does not have GDAT chunks either. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: implement generation data chunkAbhishek Kumar1-11/+103
As discovered by Ævar, we cannot increment graph version to distinguish between generation numbers v1 and v2 [1]. Thus, one of pre-requistes before implementing generation number v2 was to distinguish between graph versions in a backwards compatible manner. We are going to introduce a new chunk called Generation DATa chunk (or GDAT). GDAT will store corrected committer date offsets whereas CDAT will still store topological level. Old Git does not understand GDAT chunk and would ignore it, reading topological levels from CDAT. New Git can parse GDAT and take advantage of newer generation numbers, falling back to topological levels when GDAT chunk is missing (as it would happen with a commit-graph written by old Git). We introduce a test environment variable 'GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT' which forces commit-graph file to be written without generation data chunk to emulate a commit-graph file written by old Git. To minimize the space required to store corrrected commit date, Git stores corrected commit date offsets into the commit-graph file, instea of corrected commit dates. This saves us 4 bytes per commit, decreasing the GDAT chunk size by half, but it's possible for the offset to overflow the 4-bytes allocated for storage. As such overflows are and should be exceedingly rare, we use the following overflow management scheme: We introduce a new commit-graph chunk, Generation Data OVerflow ('GDOV') to store corrected commit dates for commits with offsets greater than GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX. If the offset is greater than GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX, we set the MSB of the offset and the other bits store the position of corrected commit date in GDOV chunk, similar to how Extra Edge List is maintained. We test the overflow-related code with the following repo history: F - N - U / \ U - N - U N \ / N - F - N Where the commits denoted by U have committer date of zero seconds since Unix epoch, the commits denoted by N have committer date of 1112354055 (default committer date for the test suite) seconds since Unix epoch and the commits denoted by F have committer date of (2 ^ 31 - 2) seconds since Unix epoch. The largest offset observed is 2 ^ 31, just large enough to overflow. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/87a7gdspo4.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: implement corrected commit dateAbhishek Kumar1-4/+17
With most of preparations done, let's implement corrected commit date. The corrected commit date for a commit is defined as: * A commit with no parents (a root commit) has corrected commit date equal to its committer date. * A commit with at least one parent has corrected commit date equal to the maximum of its commit date and one more than the largest corrected commit date among its parents. As a special case, a root commit with timestamp of zero (01.01.1970 00:00:00Z) has corrected commit date of one, to be able to distinguish from GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO (that is, an uncomputed corrected commit date). To minimize the space required to store corrected commit date, Git stores corrected commit date offsets into the commit-graph file. The corrected commit date offset for a commit is defined as the difference between its corrected commit date and actual commit date. Storing corrected commit date requires sizeof(timestamp_t) bytes, which in most cases is 64 bits (uintmax_t). However, corrected commit date offsets can be safely stored using only 32-bits. This halves the size of GDAT chunk, which is a reduction of around 6% in the size of commit-graph file. However, using offsets be problematic if a commit is malformed but valid and has committer date of 0 Unix time, as the offset would be the same as corrected commit date and thus require 64-bits to be stored properly. While Git does not write out offsets at this stage, Git stores the corrected commit dates in member generation of struct commit_graph_data. It will begin writing commit date offsets with the introduction of generation data chunk. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: return 64-bit generation numberAbhishek Kumar1-11/+11
In a preparatory step for introducing corrected commit dates, let's return timestamp_t values from commit_graph_generation(), use timestamp_t for local variables and define GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY as (2 ^ 63 - 1) instead. We rename GENERATION_NUMBER_MAX to GENERATION_NUMBER_V1_MAX to represent the largest topological level we can store in the commit data chunk. With corrected commit dates implemented, we will have two such *_MAX variables to denote the largest offset and largest topological level that can be stored. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: add a slab to store topological levelsAbhishek Kumar1-15/+30
In a later commit we will introduce corrected commit date as the generation number v2. Corrected commit dates will be stored in the new seperate Generation Data chunk. However, to ensure backwards compatibility with "Old" Git we need to continue to write generation number v1 (topological levels) to the commit data chunk. Thus, we need to compute and store both versions of generation numbers to write the commit-graph file. Therefore, let's introduce a commit-slab `topo_level_slab` to store topological levels; corrected commit date will be stored in the member `generation` of struct commit_graph_data. The macros `GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY` and `GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO` mark commits not in the commit-graph file and commits written by a version of Git that did not compute generation numbers respectively. Generation numbers are computed identically for both kinds of commits. A "slab-miss" should return `GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY` as the commit is not in the commit-graph file. However, since the slab is zero-initialized, it returns 0 (or rather `GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO`). Thus, we no longer need to check if the topological level of a commit is `GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY`. We will add a pointer to the slab in `struct write_commit_graph_context` and `struct commit_graph` to populate the slab in `fill_commit_graph_info` if the commit has a pre-computed topological level as in case of split commit-graphs. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: consolidate fill_commit_graph_infoAbhishek Kumar1-17/+10
Both fill_commit_graph_info() and fill_commit_in_graph() parse information present in commit data chunk. Let's simplify the implementation by calling fill_commit_graph_info() within fill_commit_in_graph(). fill_commit_graph_info() used to not load committer data from commit data chunk. However, with the upcoming switch to using corrected committer date as generation number v2, we will have to load committer date to compute generation number value anyway. e51217e15 (t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers, 30-06-2016) introduced a test 'generate tar with future mtime' that creates a commit with committer date of (2^36 + 1) seconds since EPOCH. The CDAT chunk provides 34-bits for storing committer date, thus committer time overflows into generation number (within CDAT chunk) and has undefined behavior. The test used to pass as fill_commit_graph_info() would not set struct member `date` of struct commit and load committer date from the object database, generating a tar file with the expected mtime. However, with corrected commit date, we will load the committer date from CDAT chunk (truncated to lower 34-bits to populate the generation number. Thus, Git sets date and generates tar file with the truncated mtime. The ustar format (the header format used by most modern tar programs) only has room for 11 (or 12, depending on some implementations) octal digits for the size and mtime of each file. As the CDAT chunk is overflow by 12-octal digits but not 11-octal digits, we split the existing tests to test both implementations separately and add a new explicit test for 11-digit implementation. To test the 11-octal digit implementation, we create a future commit with committer date of 2^34 - 1, which overflows 11-octal digits without overflowing 34-bits of the Commit Date chunks. To test the 12-octal digit implementation, the smallest committer date possible is 2^36 + 1, which overflows the CDAT chunk and thus commit-graph must be disabled for the test. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: fix regression when computing Bloom filtersAbhishek Kumar1-2/+6
Before computing Bloom filters, the commit-graph machinery uses commit_gen_cmp to sort commits by generation order for improved diff performance. 3d11275505 (commit-graph: examine commits by generation number, 2020-03-30) claims that this sort can reduce the time spent to compute Bloom filters by nearly half. But since c49c82aa4c (commit: move members graph_pos, generation to a slab, 2020-06-17), this optimization is broken, since asking for a 'commit_graph_generation()' directly returns GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY while writing. Not all hope is lost, though: 'commit_gen_cmp()' falls back to comparing commits by their date when they have equal generation number, and so since c49c82aa4c is purely a date comparison function. This heuristic is good enough that we don't seem to loose appreciable performance while computing Bloom filters. Applying this patch (compared with v2.30.0) speeds up computing Bloom filters by factors ranging from 0.40% to 5.19% on various repositories [1]. So, avoid the useless 'commit_graph_generation()' while writing by instead accessing the slab directly. This returns the newly-computed generation numbers, and allows us to avoid the heuristic by directly comparing generation numbers. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210105094535.GN8396@szeder.dev/ Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-06commit-graph: don't peek into `struct lock_file`Martin Ågren1-3/+3
Similar to the previous commit, avoid peeking into the `struct lock_file`. Use the lock file API instead. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-04hash-lookup: rename from sha1-lookupMartin Ågren1-1/+1
Change all remnants of "sha1" in hash-lookup.c and .h and rename them to reflect that we're not just able to handle SHA-1 these days. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-04sha1-lookup: rename `sha1_pos()` as `hash_pos()`Martin Ågren1-3/+3
Rename this function to reflect that we're not just able to handle SHA-1 these days. There are a few instances of "sha1" left in sha1-lookup.[ch] after this, but those will be addressed in the next commit. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-07commit-graph: use size_t for array allocation and indexingJeff King1-2/+2
Our packed_commit_list is an array of pointers to commit structs. We use "int" for the allocation, which is 32-bit even on 64-bit platforms. This isn't likely to overflow in practice (we're writing commit graphs, so you'd need to actually have billions of unique commits in the repository). But it's good practice to use size_t for allocations. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-07commit-graph: replace packed_oid_list with oid_arrayJeff King1-47/+15
Our custom packed_oid_list data structure is really just an oid_array in disguise. Let's switch to using the generic structure, which shortens and simplifies the code slightly. There's one slightly awkward part: in the old code we copied a hash straight from the mmap'd on-disk data into the final object_id. And now we'll copy to a temporary oid, which we'll then pass to oid_array_append(). But this is an operation we have to do all over the commit-graph code already, since it mostly uses object_id structs internally. I also measured "git commit-graph --append", which triggers this code path, and it showed no difference. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-07commit-graph: drop count_distinct_commits() functionJeff King1-41/+2
When writing a commit graph, we collect a list of object ids in an array, which we'll eventually copy into an array of "struct commit" pointers. Before we do that, though, we count the number of distinct commit entries. There's a subtle bug in this step, though. We eliminate not only duplicate oids, but also in split mode, any oids which are not commits or which are already in a graph file. However, the loop starts at index 1, always counting index 0 as distinct. And indeed it can't be a duplicate, since we check for those by comparing against the previous entry, and there isn't one for index 0. But it could be a commit that's already in a graph file, and we'd overcount the number of commits by 1 in that case. That turns out not to be a problem, though. The only things we do with the count are: - check if our count will overflow our data structures. But the limit there is 2^31 commits, so while this is a useful check, the off-by-one is not likely to matter. - pre-allocate the array of commit pointers. But over-allocating by one isn't a problem; we'll just waste a few extra bytes. The bug would be easy enough to fix, but we can observe that neither of those steps is necessary. After building the actual commit array, we'll likewise check its count for overflow. So the extra check of the distinct commit count here is redundant. And likewise we use ALLOC_GROW() when building the commit array, so there's no need to preallocate it (it's possible that doing so is slightly more efficient, but if we care we can just optimistically allocate one slot for each oid; I didn't bother here). So count_distinct_commits() isn't doing anything useful. Let's just get rid of that step. Note that a side effect of the function was that we sorted the list of oids, which we do rely on in copy_oids_to_commits(), since it must also skip the duplicates. So we'll move the qsort there. I didn't copy the "TODO" about adding more progress meters. It's actually quite hard to make a repository large enough for this qsort would take an appreciable amount of time, so this doesn't seem like a useful note. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-02Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-merging-fix'Junio C Hamano1-3/+18
When "git commit-graph" detects the same commit recorded more than once while it is merging the layers, it used to die. The code now ignores all but one of them and continues. * ds/commit-graph-merging-fix: commit-graph: don't write commit-graph when disabled commit-graph: ignore duplicates when merging layers
2020-10-09commit-graph: don't write commit-graph when disabledDerrick Stolee1-0/+5
The core.commitGraph config setting can be set to 'false' to prevent parsing commits from the commit-graph file(s). This causes an issue when trying to write with "--split" which needs to distinguish between commits that are in the existing commit-graph layers and commits that are not. The existing mechanism uses parse_commit() and follows by checking if there is a 'graph_pos' that shows the commit was parsed from the commit-graph file. When core.commitGraph=false, we do not parse the commits from the commit-graph and 'graph_pos' indicates that no commits are in the existing file. The --split logic moves forward creating a new layer on top that holds all reachable commits, then possibly merges down into those layers, resulting in duplicate commits. The previous change makes that merging process more robust to such a situation in case it happens in the written commit-graph data. The easy answer here is to avoid writing a commit-graph if reading the commit-graph is disabled. Since the resulting commit-graph will would not be read by subsequent Git processes. This is more natural than forcing core.commitGraph to be true for the 'write' process. Reported-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-09commit-graph: ignore duplicates when merging layersDerrick Stolee1-3/+13
Thomas reported [1] that a "git fetch" command was failing with an error saying "unexpected duplicate commit id". The root cause is that they had fetch.writeCommitGraph enabled which generates commit-graph chains, and this instance was merging two layers that both contained the same commit ID. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/55f8f00c-a61c-67d4-889e-a9501c596c39@virtuell-zuhause.de/ The initial assumption is that Git would not write a commit ID into a commit-graph layer if it already exists in a lower commit-graph layer. Somehow, this specific case did get into that situation, leading to this error. While unexpected, this isn't actually invalid (as long as the two layers agree on the metadata for the commit). When we parse a commit that does not have a graph_pos in the commit_graph_data_slab, we use binary search in the commit-graph layers to find the commit and set graph_pos. That position is never used again in this case. However, when we parse a commit from the commit-graph file, we load its parents from the commit-graph and assign graph_pos at that point. If those parents were already parsed from the commit-graph, then nothing needs to be done. Otherwise, this graph_pos is a valid position in the commit-graph so we can parse the parents, when necessary. Thus, this die() is too aggressive. The easiest thing to do would be to ignore the duplicates. If we only ignore the duplicates, then we will produce a commit-graph that has identical commit IDs listed in adjacent positions. This excess data will never be removed from the commit-graph, which could cascade into significantly bloated file sizes. Thankfully, we can collapse the list to erase the duplicate commit pointers. This allows us to get the end result we want without extra memory costs and minimal CPU time. The root cause is due to disabling core.commitGraph, which prevents parsing commits from the lower layers during a 'git commit-graph write --split' command. Since we use the 'graph_pos' value to determine whether a commit is in a lower layer, we never discover that those commits are already in the commit-graph chain and add them to the top layer. This layer is then merged down, creating duplicates. The test added in t5324-split-commit-graph.sh fails without this change. However, we still have not completely removed the need for this duplicate check. That will come in a follow-up change. Reported-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de> Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-29Merge branch 'tb/bloom-improvements'Junio C Hamano1-42/+99
"git commit-graph write" learned to limit the number of bloom filters that are computed from scratch with the --max-new-filters option. * tb/bloom-improvements: commit-graph: introduce 'commitGraph.maxNewFilters' builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>' commit-graph: rename 'split_commit_graph_opts' bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-empty bloom/diff: properly short-circuit on max_changes bloom: use provided 'struct bloom_filter_settings' bloom: split 'get_bloom_filter()' in two commit-graph.c: store maximum changed paths commit-graph: respect 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths' t/helper/test-read-graph.c: prepare repo settings commit-graph: pass a 'struct repository *' in more places t4216: use an '&&'-chain commit-graph: introduce 'get_bloom_filter_settings()'
2020-09-25Merge branch 'ds/maintenance-part-1'Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
A "git gc"'s big brother has been introduced to take care of more repository maintenance tasks, not limited to the object database cleaning. * ds/maintenance-part-1: maintenance: add trace2 regions for task execution maintenance: add auto condition for commit-graph task maintenance: use pointers to check --auto maintenance: create maintenance.<task>.enabled config maintenance: take a lock on the objects directory maintenance: add --task option maintenance: add commit-graph task maintenance: initialize task array maintenance: replace run_auto_gc() maintenance: add --quiet option maintenance: create basic maintenance runner
2020-09-18builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>'Taylor Blau1-2/+7
Introduce a command-line flag to specify the maximum number of new Bloom filters that a 'git commit-graph write' is willing to compute from scratch. Prior to this patch, a commit-graph write with '--changed-paths' would compute Bloom filters for all selected commits which haven't already been computed (i.e., by a previous commit-graph write with '--split' such that a roll-up or replacement is performed). This behavior can cause prohibitively-long commit-graph writes for a variety of reasons: * There may be lots of filters whose diffs take a long time to generate (for example, they have close to the maximum number of changes, diffing itself takes a long time, etc). * Old-style commit-graphs (which encode filters with too many entries as not having been computed at all) cause us to waste time recomputing filters that appear to have not been computed only to discover that they are too-large. This can make the upper-bound of the time it takes for 'git commit-graph write --changed-paths' to be rather unpredictable. To make this command behave more predictably, introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>' to allow computing at most '<n>' Bloom filters from scratch. This lets "computing" already-known filters proceed quickly, while bounding the number of slow tasks that Git is willing to do. Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17commit-graph: rename 'split_commit_graph_opts'Taylor Blau1-20/+20
In the subsequent commit, additional options will be added to the commit-graph API which have nothing to do with splitting. Rename the 'split_commit_graph_opts' structure to the more-generic 'commit_graph_opts' to encompass both. Likewise, rename the 'flags' member to instead be 'split_flags' to clarify that it only has to do with the behavior implied by '--split'. Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-emptyTaylor Blau1-0/+5
When a changed-path Bloom filter has either zero, or more than a certain number (commonly 512) of entries, the commit-graph machinery encodes it as "missing". More specifically, it sets the indices adjacent in the BIDX chunk as equal to each other to indicate a "length 0" filter; that is, that the filter occupies zero bytes on disk. This has heretofore been fine, since the commit-graph machinery has no need to care about these filters with too few or too many changed paths. Both cases act like no filter has been generated at all, and so there is no need to store them. In a subsequent commit, however, the commit-graph machinery will learn to only compute Bloom filters for some commits in the current commit-graph layer. This is a change from the current implementation which computes Bloom filters for all commits that are in the layer being written. Critically for this patch, only computing some of the Bloom filters means adding a third state for length 0 Bloom filters: zero entries, too many entries, or "hasn't been computed". It will be important for that future patch to distinguish between "not representable" (i.e., zero or too-many changed paths), and "hasn't been computed". In particular, we don't want to waste time recomputing filters that have already been computed. To that end, change how we store Bloom filters in the "computed but not representable" category: - Bloom filters with no entries are stored as a single byte with all bits low (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will return "definitely not") - Bloom filters with too many entries are stored as a single byte with all bits set high (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will return "maybe"). These rules are sufficient to not incur a behavior change by changing the on-disk representation of these two classes. Likewise, no specification changes are necessary for the commit-graph format, either: - Filters that were previously empty will be recomputed and stored according to the new rules, and - old clients reading filters generated by new clients will interpret the filters correctly and be none the wiser to how they were generated. Clients will invoke the Bloom machinery in more cases than before, but this can be addressed by returning a NULL filter when all bits are set high. This can be addressed in a future patch. Note that this does increase the size of on-disk commit-graphs, but far less than other proposals. In particular, this is generally more efficient than storing a bitmap for which commits haven't computed their Bloom filters. Storing a bitmap incurs a penalty of one bit per commit, whereas storing explicit filters as above incurs a penalty of one byte per too-large or empty commit. In practice, these boundary commits likely occupy a small proportion of the overall number of commits, and so the size penalty is likely smaller than storing a bitmap for all commits. See, for example, these relative proportions of such boundary commits (collected by SZEDER Gábor): | Percentage of | commit-graph | | | commits modifying | file size | | ├────────┬──────────────┼───────────────────┤ pct. | | 0 path | >= 512 paths | before | after | change | ┌────────────────┼────────┼──────────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───────────┤ | android-base | 13.20% | 0.13% | 37.468M | 37.534M | +0.1741 % | | cmssw | 0.15% | 0.23% | 17.118M | 17.119M | +0.0091 % | | cpython | 3.07% | 0.01% | 7.967M | 7.971M | +0.0423 % | | elasticsearch | 0.70% | 1.00% | 8.833M | 8.835M | +0.0128 % | | gcc | 0.00% | 0.08% | 16.073M | 16.074M | +0.0030 % | | gecko-dev | 0.14% | 0.64% | 59.868M | 59.874M | +0.0105 % | | git | 0.11% | 0.02% | 3.895M | 3.895M | +0.0020 % | | glibc | 0.02% | 0.10% | 3.555M | 3.555M | +0.0021 % | | go | 0.00% | 0.07% | 3.186M | 3.186M | +0.0018 % | | homebrew-cask | 0.40% | 0.02% | 7.035M | 7.035M | +0.0065 % | | homebrew-core | 0.01% | 0.01% | 11.611M | 11.611M | +0.0002 % | | jdk | 0.26% | 5.64% | 5.537M | 5.540M | +0.0590 % | | linux | 0.01% | 0.51% | 63.735M | 63.740M | +0.0073 % | | llvm-project | 0.12% | 0.03% | 25.515M | 25.516M | +0.0050 % | | rails | 0.10% | 0.10% | 6.252M | 6.252M | +0.0027 % | | rust | 0.07% | 0.17% | 9.364M | 9.364M | +0.0033 % | | tensorflow | 0.09% | 1.02% | 7.009M | 7.010M | +0.0158 % | | webkit | 0.05% | 0.31% | 17.405M | 17.406M | +0.0047 % | (where the above increase is determined by computing a non-split commit-graph before and after this patch). Given that these projects are all "large" by commit count, the storage cost by writing these filters explicitly is negligible. In the most extreme example, android-base (which has 494,848 commits at the time of writing) would have its commit-graph increase by a modest 68.4 KB. Finally, a test to exercise filters which contain too many changed path entries will be introduced in a subsequent patch. Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17maintenance: add commit-graph taskDerrick Stolee1-4/+4
The first new task in the 'git maintenance' builtin is the 'commit-graph' task. This updates the commit-graph file incrementally with the command git commit-graph write --reachable --split By writing an incremental commit-graph file using the "--split" option we minimize the disruption from this operation. The default behavior is to merge layers until the new "top" layer is less than half the size of the layer below. This provides quick writes most of the time, with the longer writes following a power law distribution. Most importantly, concurrent Git processes only look at the commit-graph-chain file for a very short amount of time, so they will verly likely not be holding a handle to the file when we try to replace it. (This only matters on Windows.) If a concurrent process reads the old commit-graph-chain file, but our job expires some of the .graph files before they can be read, then those processes will see a warning message (but not fail). This could be avoided by a future update to use the --expire-time argument when writing the commit-graph. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17bloom: use provided 'struct bloom_filter_settings'Taylor Blau1-11/+10
When 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter()' needs to compute a Bloom filter from scratch, it looks to the default 'struct bloom_filter_settings' in order to determine the maximum number of changed paths, number of bits per entry, and so on. All of these values have so far been constant, and so there was no need to pass in a pointer from the caller (eg., the one that is stored in the 'struct write_commit_graph_context'). Start passing in a 'struct bloom_filter_settings *' instead of using the default values to respect graph-specific settings (eg., in the case of setting 'GIT_TEST_BLOOM_SETTINGS_MAX_CHANGED_PATHS'). In order to have an initialized value for these settings, move its initialization to earlier in the commit-graph write. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17bloom: split 'get_bloom_filter()' in twoTaylor Blau1-3/+31
'get_bloom_filter' takes a flag to control whether it will compute a Bloom filter if the requested one is missing. In the next patch, we'll add yet another parameter to this method, which would force all but one caller to specify an extra 'NULL' parameter at the end. Instead of doing this, split 'get_bloom_filter' into two functions: 'get_bloom_filter' and 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter'. The former only looks up a Bloom filter (and does not compute one if it's missing, thus dropping the 'compute_if_not_present' flag). The latter does compute missing Bloom filters, with an additional parameter to store whether or not it needed to do so. This simplifies many call-sites, since the majority of existing callers to 'get_bloom_filter' do not want missing Bloom filters to be computed (so they can drop the parameter entirely and use the simpler version of the function). While we're at it, instrument the new 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter()' with counters in the 'write_commit_graph_context' struct which store the number of filters that we did and didn't compute, as well as filters that were truncated. It would be nice to drop the 'compute_if_not_present' flag entirely, since all remaining callers of 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter' pass it as '1', but this will change in a future patch and hence cannot be removed. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17commit-graph.c: store maximum changed pathsTaylor Blau1-0/+4
For now, we assume that there is a fixed constant describing the maximum number of changed paths we are willing to store in a Bloom filter. Prepare for that to (at least partially) not be the case by making it a member of the 'struct bloom_filter_settings'. This will be helpful in the subsequent patches by reducing the size of test cases that exercise storing too many changed paths, as well as preparing for an eventual future in which this value might change. This patch alone does not cause newly generated Bloom filters to use a custom upper-bound on the maximum number of changed paths a single Bloom filter can hold, that will occur in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-09commit-graph: respect 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths'Taylor Blau1-2/+4
Git uses the 'core.commitGraph' configuration value to control whether or not the commit graph is used when parsing commits or performing a traversal. Now that commit-graphs can also contain a section for changed-path Bloom filters, administrators that already have commit-graphs may find it convenient to use those graphs without relying on their changed-path Bloom filters. This can happen, for example, during a staged roll-out, or in the event of an incident. Introduce 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths' to control whether or not Bloom filters are read. Note that this configuration is independent from both: - 'core.commitGraph', to allow flexibility in using all parts of a commit-graph _except_ for its Bloom filters. - The '--changed-paths' option for 'git commit-graph write', to allow reading and writing Bloom filters to be controlled independently. When the variable is set, pretend as if no Bloom data was specified at all. This avoids adding additional special-casing outside of the commit-graph internals. Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-09commit-graph: pass a 'struct repository *' in more placesTaylor Blau1-7/+10
In a future commit, some commit-graph internals will want access to 'r->settings', but we only have the 'struct object_directory *' corresponding to that repository. Add an additional parameter to pass the repository around in more places. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-09commit-graph: introduce 'get_bloom_filter_settings()'Taylor Blau1-0/+11
Many places in the code often need a pointer to the commit-graph's 'struct bloom_filter_settings', in which case they often take the value from the top-most commit-graph. In the non-split case, this works as expected. In the split case, however, things get a little tricky. Not all layers in a chain of incremental commit-graphs are required to themselves have Bloom data, and so whether or not some part of the code uses Bloom filters depends entirely on whether or not the top-most level of the commit-graph chain has Bloom filters. This has been the behavior since Bloom filters were introduced, and has been codified into the tests since a759bfa9ee (t4216: add end to end tests for git log with Bloom filters, 2020-04-06). In fact, t4216.130 requires that Bloom filters are not used in exactly the case described earlier. There is no reason that this needs to be the case, since it is perfectly valid for commits in an earlier layer to have Bloom filters when commits in a newer layer do not. Since Bloom settings are guaranteed in practice to be the same for any layer in a chain that has Bloom data, it is sufficient to traverse the '->base_graph' pointer until either (1) a non-null 'struct bloom_filter_settings *' is found, or (2) until we are at the root of the commit-graph chain. Introduce a 'get_bloom_filter_settings()' function that does just this, and use it instead of purely dereferencing the top-most graph's '->bloom_filter_settings' pointer. While we're at it, add an additional test in t5324 to guard against code in the commit-graph writing machinery that doesn't correctly handle a NULL 'struct bloom_filter *'. Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-17commit-graph: use the "hash version" byteDerrick Stolee1-1/+8
The commit-graph format reserved a byte among the header of the file to store a "hash version". During the SHA-256 work, this was not modified because file formats are not necessarily intended to work across hash versions. If a repository has SHA-256 as its hash algorithm, it automatically up-shifts the lengths of object names in all necessary formats. However, since we have this byte available for adjusting the version, we can make the file formats more obviously incompatible instead of relying on other context from the repository. Update the oid_version() method in commit-graph.c to add a new value, 2, for sha-256. This automatically writes the new value in a SHA-256 repository _and_ verifies the value is correct. This is a breaking change relative to the current 'master' branch since 092b677 (Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates', 2020-08-13) but it is not breaking relative to any released version of Git. The test impact is relatively minor: the output of 'test-tool read-graph' lists the header information, so those instances of '1' need to be replaced with a variable determined by GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH. A more careful test is added that specifically creates a repository of each type then swaps the commit-graph files. The important value here is that the "git log" command succeeds while writing a message to stderr. Helped-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-30Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-bloom-updates' into masterJunio C Hamano1-38/+110
Updates to the changed-paths bloom filter. * ds/commit-graph-bloom-updates: commit-graph: check all leading directories in changed path Bloom filters revision: empty pathspecs should not use Bloom filters revision.c: fix whitespace commit-graph: check chunk sizes after writing commit-graph: simplify chunk writes into loop commit-graph: unify the signatures of all write_graph_chunk_*() functions commit-graph: persist existence of changed-paths bloom: fix logic in get_bloom_filter() commit-graph: change test to die on parse, not load commit-graph: place bloom_settings in context
2020-07-30Merge branch 'sg/commit-graph-cleanups' into masterJunio C Hamano1-64/+48
The changed-path Bloom filter is improved using ideas from an independent implementation. * sg/commit-graph-cleanups: commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #2 commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #1 commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #2 commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #1 commit-graph: clean up #includes diff.h: drop diff_tree_oid() & friends' return value commit-slab: add a function to deep free entries on the slab commit-graph-format.txt: all multi-byte numbers are in network byte order commit-graph: fix parsing the Chunk Lookup table tree-walk.c: don't match submodule entries for 'submod/anything'
2020-07-15Merge branch 'sg/commit-graph-progress-fix' into masterJunio C Hamano1-22/+5
The code to produce progress output from "git commit-graph --write" had a few breakages, which have been fixed. * sg/commit-graph-progress-fix: commit-graph: fix "Writing out commit graph" progress counter commit-graph: fix progress of reachable commits
2020-07-09Merge branch 'tb/fix-persistent-shallow' into masterJunio C Hamano1-1/+2
When "fetch.writeCommitGraph" configuration is set in a shallow repository and a fetch moves the shallow boundary, we wrote out broken commit-graph files that do not match the reality, which has been corrected. * tb/fix-persistent-shallow: commit.c: don't persist substituted parents when unshallowing
2020-07-09commit-graph: fix "Writing out commit graph" progress counterSZEDER Gábor1-20/+2
76ffbca71a (commit-graph: write Bloom filters to commit graph file, 2020-04-06) added two delayed progress lines to writing the Bloom filter index and data chunk. This is wrong, because a single common progress is used while writing all chunks, which is not updated while writing these two new chunks, resulting in incomplete-looking "done" lines: Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 888679, done. Computing commit changed paths Bloom filters: 100% (888678/888678), done. Writing out commit graph in 6 passes: 66% (3554712/5332068), done. Use the common 'struct progress' instance while writing the Bloom filter chunks as well. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-09commit-graph: fix progress of reachable commitsSZEDER Gábor1-2/+3
To display a progress line while iterating over all refs, d335ce8f24 (commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commits, 2020-05-13) should have added a pair of start_delayed_progress() and stop_progress() calls around a for_each_ref() invocation. Alas, the stop_progress() call ended up at the wrong place, after write_commit_graph(), which does all the commit-graph computation and writing, and has several progress lines of its own. Consequently, that new Collecting referenced commits: 123 progress line is overwritten by the first progress line shown by write_commit_graph(), and its final "done" line is shown last, after everything is finished: Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 344786, done. Computing commit changed paths Bloom filters: 100% (344786/344786), done. Collecting referenced commits: 154, done. Move that stop_progress() call to the right place. While at it, drop the unnecessary 'if (data.progress)' condition protecting the stop_progress() call, because that function is prepared to handle a NULL progress struct. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-08commit.c: don't persist substituted parents when unshallowingTaylor Blau1-1/+2
Since 37b9dcabfc (shallow.c: use '{commit,rollback}_shallow_file', 2020-04-22), Git knows how to reset stat-validity checks for the $GIT_DIR/shallow file, allowing it to change between a shallow and non-shallow state in the same process (e.g., in the case of 'git fetch --unshallow'). However, when $GIT_DIR/shallow changes, Git does not alter or remove any grafts (nor substituted parents) in memory. This comes up in a "git fetch --unshallow" with fetch.writeCommitGraph set to true. Ordinarily in a shallow repository (and before 37b9dcabfc, even in this case), commit_graph_compatible() would return false, indicating that the repository should not be used to write a commit-graphs (since commit-graph files cannot represent a shallow history). But since 37b9dcabfc, in an --unshallow operation that check succeeds. Thus even though the repository isn't shallow any longer (that is, we have all of the objects), the in-core representation of those objects still has munged parents at the shallow boundaries. When the commit-graph write proceeds, we use the incorrect parentage, producing wrong results. There are two ways for a user to work around this: either (1) set 'fetch.writeCommitGraph' to 'false', or (2) drop the commit-graph after unshallowing. One way to fix this would be to reset the parsed object pool entirely (flushing the cache and thus preventing subsequent reads from modifying their parents) after unshallowing. That would produce a problem when callers have a now-stale reference to the old pool, and so this patch implements a different approach. Instead, attach a new bit to the pool, 'substituted_parent', which indicates if the repository *ever* stored a commit which had its parents modified (i.e., the shallow boundary prior to unshallowing). This bit needs to be sticky because all reads subsequent to modifying a commit's parents are unreliable when unshallowing. Modify the check in 'commit_graph_compatible' to take this bit into account, and correctly avoid generating commit-graphs in this case, thus solving the bug. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Reported-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-01commit-graph: check chunk sizes after writingSZEDER Gábor1-0/+7
In my experience while experimenting with new commit-graph chunks, early versions of the corresponding new write_commit_graph_my_chunk() functions are, sadly but not surprisingly, often buggy, and write more or less data than they are supposed to, especially if the chunk size is not directly proportional to the number of commits. This then causes all kinds of issues when reading such a bogus commit-graph file, raising the question of whether the writing or the reading part happens to be buggy this time. Let's catch such issues early, already when writing the commit-graph file, and check that each write_graph_chunk_*() function wrote the amount of data that it was expected to, and what has been encoded in the Chunk Lookup table. Now that all commit-graph chunks are written in a loop we can do this check in a single place for all chunks, and any chunks added in the future will get checked as well. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-01commit-graph: simplify chunk writes into loopSZEDER Gábor1-12/+16
In write_commit_graph_file() we now have one block of code filling the array of 'struct chunk_info' with the IDs and sizes of chunks to be written, and an other block of code calling the functions responsible for writing individual chunks. In case of optional chunks like Extra Edge List an Base Graphs List there is also a condition checking whether that chunk is necessary/desired, and that same condition is repeated in both blocks of code. Other, newer chunks have similar optional conditions. Eliminate these repeated conditions by storing the function pointers responsible for writing individual chunks in the 'struct chunk_info' array as well, and calling them in a loop to write the commit-graph file. This will open up the possibility for a bit of foolproofing in the following patch. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-01commit-graph: unify the signatures of all write_graph_chunk_*() functionsSZEDER Gábor1-16/+26
Update the write_graph_chunk_*() helper functions to have the same signature: - Return an int error code from all these functions. write_graph_chunk_base() already has an int error code, now the others will have one, too, but since they don't indicate any error, they will always return 0. - Drop the hash size parameter of write_graph_chunk_oids() and write_graph_chunk_data(); its value can be read directly from 'the_hash_algo' inside these functions as well. This opens up the possibility for further cleanups and foolproofing in the following two patches. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-01commit-graph: persist existence of changed-pathsDerrick Stolee1-3/+42
The changed-path Bloom filters were released in v2.27.0, but have a significant drawback. A user can opt-in to writing the changed-path filters using the "--changed-paths" option to "git commit-graph write" but the next write will drop the filters unless that option is specified. This becomes even more important when considering the interaction with gc.writeCommitGraph (on by default) or fetch.writeCommitGraph (part of features.experimental). These config options trigger commit-graph writes that the user did not signal, and hence there is no --changed-paths option available. Allow a user that opts-in to the changed-path filters to persist the property of "my commit-graph has changed-path filters" automatically. A user can drop filters using the --no-changed-paths option. In the process, we need to be extremely careful to match the Bloom filter settings as specified by the commit-graph. This will allow future versions of Git to customize these settings, and the version with this change will persist those settings as commit-graphs are rewritten on top. Use the trace2 API to signal the settings used during the write, and check that output in a test after manually adjusting the correct bytes in the commit-graph file. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-01bloom: fix logic in get_bloom_filter()Derrick Stolee1-2/+6
The get_bloom_filter() method is a bit complicated in some parts where it does not need to be. In particular, it needs to return a NULL filter only when compute_if_not_present is zero AND the filter data cannot be loaded from a commit-graph file. This currently happens by accident because the commit-graph does not load changed-path Bloom filters from an existing commit-graph when writing a new one. This will change in a later patch. Also clean up some style issues while we are here. One side-effect of returning a NULL filter is that the filters that are reported as "too large" will now be reported as NULL insead of length zero. This case was not properly covered before, so add a test. Further, remote the counting of the zero-length filters from revision.c and the trace2 logs. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-23commit-graph: change test to die on parse, not loadDerrick Stolee1-4/+8
43d3561 (commit-graph write: don't die if the existing graph is corrupt, 2019-03-25) introduced the GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD environment variable. This was created to verify that commit-graph was not loaded when writing a new non-incremental commit-graph. An upcoming change wants to load a commit-graph in some valuable cases, but we want to maintain that we don't trust the commit-graph data when writing our new file. Instead of dying on load, instead die if we ever try to parse a commit from the commit-graph. This functionally verifies the same intended behavior, but allows a more advanced feature in the next change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-23commit-graph: place bloom_settings in contextDerrick Stolee1-6/+8
Place an instance of struct bloom_settings into the struct write_commit_graph_context. This allows simplifying the function prototype of write_graph_chunk_bloom_data(). This will allow us to combine the function prototypes and use function pointers to simplify write_commit_graph_file(). By using a pointer, we can later replace the settings to match those that exist in the current commit-graph, in case a future Git version allows customization of these parameters. Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17commit-graph: minimize commit_graph_data_slab accessAbhishek Kumar1-14/+26
In an earlier patch, multiple struct acccesses to `graph_pos` and `generation` were auto-converted to multiple method calls. Since the values are fixed and commit-slab access costly, we would be better off with storing the values as a local variable and reusing it. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17commit: move members graph_pos, generation to a slabAbhishek Kumar1-20/+20
We remove members `graph_pos` and `generation` from the struct commit. The default assignments in init_commit_node() are no longer valid, which is fine as the slab helpers return appropriate default values and the assignments are removed. We will replace existing use of commit->generation and commit->graph_pos by commit_graph_data_slab helpers using `contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci'. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17commit-graph: introduce commit_graph_data_slabAbhishek Kumar1-10/+68
The struct commit is used in many contexts. However, members `generation` and `graph_pos` are only used for commit-graph related operations and otherwise waste memory. This wastage would have been more pronounced as we transition to generation number v2, which uses 64-bit generation number instead of current 32-bits. As they are often accessed together, let's introduce struct commit_graph_data and move them to a commit_graph_data slab. While the overall test suite runs just as fast as master, (series: 26m48s, master: 27m34s, faster by 2.87%), certain commands like `git merge-base --is-ancestor` were slowed by 40% as discovered by Szeder Gábor [1]. After minimizing commit-slab access, the slow down persists but is closer to 20%. Derrick Stolee believes the slow down is attributable to the underlying algorithm rather than the slowness of commit-slab access [2] and we will follow-up in a later series. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200607195347.GA8232@szeder.dev/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/13db757a-9412-7f1e-805c-8a028c4ab2b1@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-no-check-oids'Junio C Hamano1-35/+27
Clean-up the commit-graph codepath. * tb/commit-graph-no-check-oids: commit-graph: drop COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHECK_OIDS flag t5318: reorder test below 'graph_read_expect' commit-graph.c: simplify 'fill_oids_from_commits' builtin/commit-graph.c: dereference tags in builtin builtin/commit-graph.c: extract 'read_one_commit()' commit-graph.c: peel refs in 'add_ref_to_set' commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commits commit-graph.c: extract 'refs_cb_data'
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #2SZEDER Gábor1-21/+24
Unify the 'chunk_ids' and 'chunk_sizes' arrays into an array of 'struct chunk_info'. This will allow more cleanups in the following patches. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #1SZEDER Gábor1-29/+17
In write_commit_graph_file() one block of code fills the array of chunk IDs, another block of code fills the array of chunk offsets, then the chunk IDs and offsets are written to the Chunk Lookup table, and finally a third block of code writes the actual chunks. In case of optional chunks like Extra Edge List and Base Graphs List there is also a condition checking whether that chunk is necessary/desired, and that same condition is repeated in all those three blocks of code. This patch series is about to add more optional chunks, so there would be even more repeated conditions. Those chunk offsets are relative to the beginning of the file, so they inherently depend on the size of the Chunk Lookup table, which in turn depends on the number of chunks that are to be written to the commit-graph file. IOW at the time we set the first chunk's ID we can't yet know its offset, because we don't yet know how many chunks there are. Simplify this by initially filling an array of chunk sizes, not offsets, and calculate the offsets based on the chunk sizes only later, while we are writing the Chunk Lookup table. This way we can fill the arrays of chunk IDs and sizes in one go, eliminating one set of repeated conditions. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #2SZEDER Gábor1-17/+9
The Chunk Lookup table stores the chunks' starting offset in the commit-graph file, not their sizes. Consequently, the size of a chunk can only be calculated by subtracting its offset from the offset of the subsequent chunk (or that of the terminating label). This is currenly implemented in a bit complicated way: as we iterate over the entries of the Chunk Lookup table, we check the id of each chunk and store its starting offset, then we check the id of the last seen chunk and calculate its size using its previously saved offset. At the moment there is only one chunk for which we calculate its size, but this patch series will add more, and the repeated chunk id checks are not that pretty. Instead let's read ahead the offset of the next chunk on each iteration, so we can calculate the size of each chunk right away, right where we store its starting offset. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #1SZEDER Gábor1-7/+9
While we iterate over all entries of the Chunk Lookup table we make sure that we don't attempt to read past the end of the mmap-ed commit-graph file, and check in each iteration that the chunk ID and offset we are about to read is still within the mmap-ed memory region. However, these checks in each iteration are not really necessary, because the number of chunks in the commit-graph file is already known before this loop from the just parsed commit-graph header. So let's check that the commit-graph file is large enough for all entries in the Chunk Lookup table before we start iterating over those entries, and drop those per-iteration checks. While at it, take into account the size of everything that is necessary to have a valid commit-graph file, i.e. the size of the header, the size of the mandatory OID Fanout chunk, and the size of the signature in the trailer as well. Note that this necessitates the change of the error message as well, and, consequently, have to update the 'detect incorrect chunk count' test in 't5318-commit-graph.sh' as well. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: clean up #includesSZEDER Gábor1-3/+1
Our CodingGuidelines says that it's sufficient to include one of 'git-compat-util.h' and 'cache.h', but both 'commit-graph.c' and 'commit-graph.h' include both. Let's include only 'git-compat-util.h' to loose a bunch of unnecessary dependencies; but include 'hash.h', because 'commit-graph.h' does require the definition of 'struct object_id'. 'commit-graph.h' explicitly includes 'repository.h' and 'string-list.h', but only needs the declaration of a few structs from them. Drop these includes and forward-declare the necessary structs instead. 'commit-graph.c' includes 'dir.h', but doesn't actually use anything from there, so let's drop that #include as well. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: fix parsing the Chunk Lookup tableSZEDER Gábor1-1/+1
The commit-graph file format specifies that the chunks may be in any order. However, if the OID Lookup chunk happens to be the last one in the file, then any command attempting to access the commit-graph data will fail with: fatal: invalid commit position. commit-graph is likely corrupt In this case the error is wrong, the commit-graph file does conform to the specification, but the parsing of the Chunk Lookup table is a bit buggy, and leaves the field holding the number of commits in the commit-graph zero-initialized. The number of commits in the commit-graph is determined while parsing the Chunk Lookup table, by dividing the size of the OID Lookup chunk with the hash size. However, the Chunk Lookup table doesn't actually store the size of the chunks, but it stores their starting offset. Consequently, the size of a chunk can only be calculated by subtracting the starting offsets of that chunk from the offset of the subsequent chunk, or in case of the last chunk from the offset recorded in the terminating label. This is currenly implemented in a bit complicated way: as we iterate over the entries of the Chunk Lookup table, we check the ID of each chunk and store its starting offset, then we check the ID of the last seen chunk and calculate its size using its previously saved offset if necessary (at the moment it's only necessary for the OID Lookup chunk). Alas, while parsing the Chunk Lookup table we only interate through the "real" chunks, but never look at the terminating label, thus don't even check whether it's necessary to calulate the size of the last chunk. Consequently, if the OID Lookup chunk is the last one, then we don't calculate its size and turn don't run the piece of code determining the number of commits in the commit graph, leaving the field holding that number unchanged (i.e. zero-initialized), eventually triggering the sanity check in load_oid_from_graph(). Fix this by iterating through all entries in the Chunk Lookup table, including the terminating label. Note that this is the minimal fix, suitable for the maintenance track. A better fix would be to simplify how the chunk sizes are calculated, but that is a more invasive change, less suitable for 'maint', so that will be done in later patches. This additional flexibility of scanning more chunks breaks a test for "git commit-graph verify" so alter that test to mutate the commit-graph to have an even lower chunk count. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-18commit-graph: drop COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHECK_OIDS flagTaylor Blau1-2/+0
Since 7c5c9b9c57 (commit-graph: error out on invalid commit oids in 'write --stdin-commits', 2019-08-05), the commit-graph builtin dies on receiving non-commit OIDs as input to '--stdin-commits'. This behavior can be cumbersome to work around in, say, the case of piping 'git for-each-ref' to 'git commit-graph write --stdin-commits' if the caller does not want to cull out non-commits themselves. In this situation, it would be ideal if 'git commit-graph write' wrote the graph containing the inputs that did pertain to commits, and silently ignored the remainder of the input. Some options have been proposed to the effect of '--[no-]check-oids' which would allow callers to have the commit-graph builtin do just that. After some discussion, it is difficult to imagine a caller who wouldn't want to pass '--no-check-oids', suggesting that we should get rid of the behavior of complaining about non-commit inputs altogether. If callers do wish to retain this behavior, they can easily work around this change by doing the following: git for-each-ref --format='%(objectname) %(objecttype) %(*objecttype)' | awk ' !/commit/ { print "not-a-commit:"$1 } /commit/ { print $1 } ' | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits To make it so that valid OIDs that refer to non-existent objects are indeed an error after loosening the error handling, perform an extra lookup to make sure that object indeed exists before sending it to the commit-graph internals. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-18commit-graph.c: simplify 'fill_oids_from_commits'Taylor Blau1-30/+3
In the previous handful of commits, both 'git commit-graph write --reachable' and '--stdin-commits' learned to peel tags down to the commits which they refer to before passing them into the commit-graph internals. This makes the call to 'lookup_commit_reference_gently()' inside of 'fill_oids_from_commits()' a noop, since all OIDs are commits by that point. As such, remove the call entirely, as well as the progress meter, which has been split and moved out to the callers in the aforementioned earlier commits. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-13commit-graph.c: peel refs in 'add_ref_to_set'Taylor Blau1-1/+5
While iterating references (to discover the set of commits to write to the commit-graph with 'git commit-graph write --reachable'), 'add_ref_to_set' can save 'fill_oids_from_commits()' some time by peeling the references beforehand. Move peeling out of 'fill_oids_from_commits()' and into 'add_ref_to_set()' to use 'peel_ref()' instead of 'deref_tag()'. Doing so allows the commit-graph machinery to use the peeled value from '$GIT_DIR/packed-refs' instead of having to load and parse tags. While we're at it, discard non-commit objects reachable from ref tips. This would be done automatically by 'fill_oids_from_commits()', but such functionality will be removed in a subsequent patch after the call to 'lookup_commit_reference_gently' is dropped (at which point a non-commit object in the commits oidset will become an error). Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-13commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commitsTaylor Blau1-0/+9
When 'git commit-graph write --reachable' is invoked, the commit-graph machinery calls 'for_each_ref()' to discover the set of reachable commits. Right now the 'add_ref_to_set' callback is not doing anything other than adding an OID to the set of known-reachable OIDs. In a subsequent commit, 'add_ref_to_set' will presumptively peel references. This operation should be fast for repositories with an up-to-date '$GIT_DIR/packed-refs', but may be slow in the general case. So that it doesn't appear that 'git commit-graph write' is idling with '--reachable' in the slow case, add a progress meter to provide some output in the meantime. In general, we don't expect a progress meter to appear at all, since peeling references with a 'packed-refs' file is quick. If it's slow and we do show a progress meter, the subsequent 'fill_oids_from_commits()' will be fast, since all of the calls to 'lookup_commit_reference_gently()' will be no-ops. Both progress meters are delayed, so it is unlikely that more than one will appear. In either case, this intermediate state will go away in a handful of patches, at which point there will be at most one progress meter. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-13Merge branch 'tb/shallow-cleanup'Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
Code cleanup. * tb/shallow-cleanup: shallow: use struct 'shallow_lock' for additional safety shallow.h: document '{commit,rollback}_shallow_file' shallow: extract a header file for shallow-related functions commit: make 'commit_graft_pos' non-static
2020-05-08Merge branch 'jt/commit-graph-plug-memleak'Junio C Hamano1-11/+11
Fix a leak noticed by fuzzer. * jt/commit-graph-plug-memleak: commit-graph: avoid memory leaks
2020-05-05Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-perm-bits'Junio C Hamano1-2/+10
Some of the files commit-graph subsystem keeps on disk did not correctly honor the core.sharedRepository settings and some were left read-write. * tb/commit-graph-perm-bits: commit-graph.c: make 'commit-graph-chain's read-only commit-graph.c: ensure graph layers respect core.sharedRepository commit-graph.c: write non-split graphs as read-only lockfile.c: introduce 'hold_lock_file_for_update_mode' tempfile.c: introduce 'create_tempfile_mode'
2020-05-04commit-graph.c: extract 'refs_cb_data'Taylor Blau1-3/+11
In subsequent patches, we are going to update a progress meter when 'add_ref_to_set()' is called, and need a convenient way to pass a 'struct progress *' in from the caller. Introduce 'refs_cb_data' as a catch-all for parameters that 'add_ref_to_set' may need, and wrap the existing single parameter in that struct. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-04commit-graph: avoid memory leaksJonathan Tan1-11/+11
A fuzzer running on the entry point provided by fuzz-commit-graph.c revealed a memory leak when parse_commit_graph() creates a struct bloom_filter_settings and then returns early due to error. Fix that error by always freeing that struct first (if it exists) before returning early due to error. While making that change, I also noticed another possible memory leak - when the BLOOMDATA chunk is provided but not BLOOMINDEXES. Also fix that error. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-01Merge branch 'ds/blame-on-bloom'Junio C Hamano1-0/+14
"git blame" learns to take advantage of the "changed-paths" Bloom filter stored in the commit-graph file. * ds/blame-on-bloom: test-bloom: check that we have expected arguments test-bloom: fix some whitespace issues blame: drop unused parameter from maybe_changed_path blame: use changed-path Bloom filters tests: write commit-graph with Bloom filters revision: complicated pathspecs disable filters
2020-05-01Merge branch 'gs/commit-graph-path-filter'Junio C Hamano1-6/+207
Introduce an extension to the commit-graph to make it efficient to check for the paths that were modified at each commit using Bloom filters. * gs/commit-graph-path-filter: bloom: ignore renames when computing changed paths commit-graph: add GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_CHANGED_PATHS test flag t4216: add end to end tests for git log with Bloom filters revision.c: add trace2 stats around Bloom filter usage revision.c: use Bloom filters to speed up path based revision walks commit-graph: add --changed-paths option to write subcommand commit-graph: reuse existing Bloom filters during write commit-graph: write Bloom filters to commit graph file commit-graph: examine commits by generation number commit-graph: examine changed-path objects in pack order commit-graph: compute Bloom filters for changed paths diff: halt tree-diff early after max_changes bloom.c: core Bloom filter implementation for changed paths. bloom.c: introduce core Bloom filter constructs bloom.c: add the murmur3 hash implementation commit-graph: define and use MAX_NUM_CHUNKS
2020-05-01Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-fd-exhaustion-fix'Junio C Hamano1-13/+8
The commit-graph code exhausted file descriptors easily when it does not have to. * tb/commit-graph-fd-exhaustion-fix: commit-graph: close descriptors after mmap commit-graph.c: gracefully handle file descriptor exhaustion t/test-lib.sh: make ULIMIT_FILE_DESCRIPTORS available to tests commit-graph.c: don't use discarded graph_name in error
2020-05-01Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-split-strategy'Junio C Hamano1-47/+84
"git commit-graph write" learned different ways to write out split files. * tb/commit-graph-split-strategy: Revert "commit-graph.c: introduce '--[no-]check-oids'" commit-graph.c: introduce '--[no-]check-oids' commit-graph.h: replace 'commit_hex' with 'commits' oidset: introduce 'oidset_size' builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce split strategy 'replace' builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce split strategy 'no-merge' builtin/commit-graph.c: support for '--split[=<strategy>]' t/helper/test-read-graph.c: support commit-graph chains
2020-04-30shallow: extract a header file for shallow-related functionsTaylor Blau1-0/+1
There are many functions in commit.h that are more related to shallow repositories than they are to any sort of generic commit machinery. Likely this began when there were only a few shallow-related functions, and commit.h seemed a reasonable enough place to put them. But, now there are a good number of shallow-related functions, and placing them all in 'commit.h' doesn't make sense. This patch extracts a 'shallow.h', which takes all of the declarations from 'commit.h' for functions which already exist in 'shallow.c'. We will bring the remaining shallow-related functions defined in 'commit.c' in a subsequent patch. For now, move only the ones that already are implemented in 'shallow.c', and update the necessary includes. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-29Revert "commit-graph.c: introduce '--[no-]check-oids'"Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This reverts commit 7a9ce0269bc0f4ef230f930b3910b70ac3142552, which has not yet gained consensus.
2020-04-29commit-graph.c: make 'commit-graph-chain's read-onlyTaylor Blau1-1/+2
In a previous commit, we made incremental graph layers read-only by using 'git_mkstemp_mode' with permissions '0444'. There is no reason that 'commit-graph-chain's should be modifiable by the user, since they are generated at a temporary location and then atomically renamed into place. To ensure that these files are read-only, too, use 'hold_lock_file_for_update_mode' with the same read-only permission bits, and let the umask and 'adjust_shared_perm' take care of the rest. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-29commit-graph.c: ensure graph layers respect core.sharedRepositoryTaylor Blau1-0/+6
Non-layered commit-graphs use 'adjust_shared_perm' to make the commit-graph file readable (or not) to a combination of the user, group, and others. Call 'adjust_shared_perm' for split-graph layers to make sure that these also respect 'core.sharedRepository'. The 'commit-graph-chain' file already respects this configuration since it uses 'hold_lock_file_for_update' (which calls 'adjust_shared_perm' eventually in 'create_tempfile_mode'). Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-29commit-graph.c: write non-split graphs as read-onlyTaylor Blau1-1/+2
In the previous commit, Git learned 'hold_lock_file_for_update_mode' to allow the caller to specify the permission bits (prior to further adjustment by the umask and shared repository permissions) used when acquiring a temporary file. Use this in the commit-graph machinery for writing a non-split graph to acquire an opened temporary file with permissions read-only permissions to match the split behavior. (In the split case, Git uses git_mkstemp_mode' for each of the commit-graph layers with permission bits '0444'). One can notice this discrepancy when moving a non-split graph to be part of a new chain. This causes a commit-graph chain where all layers have read-only permission bits, except for the base layer, which is writable for the current user. Resolve this discrepancy by using the new 'hold_lock_file_for_update_mode' and passing the desired permission bits. Doing so causes some test fallout in t5318 and t6600. In t5318, this occurs in tests that corrupt a commit-graph file by writing into it. For these, 'chmod u+w'-ing the file beforehand resolves the issue. The additional spot in 'corrupt_graph_verify' is necessary because of the extra 'git commit-graph write' beforehand (which *does* rewrite the commit-graph file). In t6600, this is caused by copying a read-only commit-graph file into place and then trying to replace it. For these, make these files writable. Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-28Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-expiry-fix'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git commit-graph write --expire-time=<timestamp>" did not use the given timestamp correctly, which has been corrected. * ds/commit-graph-expiry-fix: commit-graph: fix buggy --expire-time option
2020-04-24commit-graph: close descriptors after mmapJeff King1-10/+5
We don't ever refer to the descriptor after mmap-ing it. And keeping it open means we can run out of descriptors in degenerate cases (e.g., thousands of split chain files). Let's close it as soon as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-23commit-graph.c: gracefully handle file descriptor exhaustionTaylor Blau1-2/+2
When writing a layered commit-graph, the commit-graph machinery uses 'commit_graph_filenames_after' and 'commit_graph_hash_after' to keep track of the layers in the chain that we are in the process of writing. When the number of commit-graph layers shrinks, we initialize all entries in the aforementioned arrays, because we know the structure of the new commit-graph chain immediately (since there are no new layers, there are no unknown hash values). But when the number of commit-graph layers grows (i.e., that 'num_commit_graphs_after > num_commit_graphs_before'), then we leave some entries in the filenames and hashes arrays as uninitialized, because we will fill them in later as those values become available. For instance, we rely on 'write_commit_graph_file's to store the filename and hash of the last layer in the new chain, which is the one that it is responsible for writing. But, it's possible that 'write_commit_graph_file' may fail, e.g., from file descriptor exhaustion. In this case it is possible that 'git_mkstemp_mode' will fail, and that function will return early *before* setting the values for the last commit-graph layer's filename and hash. This causes a number of upleasant side-effects. For instance, trying to 'free()' each entry in 'ctx->commit_graph_filenames_after' (and similarly for the hashes array) causes us to 'free()' uninitialized memory, since the area is allocated with 'malloc()' and is therefore subject to contain garbage (which is left alone when 'write_commit_graph_file' returns early). This can manifest in other issues, like a general protection fault, and/or leaving a stray 'commit-graph-chain.lock' around after the process dies. (The reasoning for this is still a mystery to me, since we'd otherwise usually expect the kernel to run tempfile.c's 'atexit()' handlers in the case of a normal death...) To resolve this, initialize the memory with 'CALLOC_ARRAY' so that uninitialized entries are filled with zeros, and can thus be 'free()'d as a noop instead of causing a fault. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-23commit-graph.c: don't use discarded graph_name in errorTaylor Blau1-1/+1
When writing a commit-graph layer, we do so in a temporary file which is renamed into place. If we fail to create a temporary file, for e.g., because we have too many open files, then 'git_mkstemp_mode' sets the pattern to the empty string, in which case we get an error something along the lines of: error: unable to create '' It's not useful to show the pattern here at all, since we (1) know the pattern is well-formed, and (2) would have already shown the dirname when trying to create the leading directories. So, replace this error with something friendlier. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-16tests: write commit-graph with Bloom filtersDerrick Stolee1-0/+14
The GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH environment variable updates the commit- graph file whenever "git commit" is run, ensuring that we always have an updated commit-graph throughout the test suite. The GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_CHANGED_PATHS environment variable was introduced to write the changed-path Bloom filters whenever "git commit-graph write" is run. However, the GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH trick doesn't launch a separate process and instead writes it directly. To expand the number of tests that have commits in the commit-graph file, add a helper method that computes the commit-graph and place that helper inside "git commit" and "git merge". In the helper method, check GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_CHANGED_PATHS to ensure we are writing changed-path Bloom filters whenever possible. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-15commit-graph.c: introduce '--[no-]check-oids'Taylor Blau1-1/+1
When operating on a stream of commit OIDs on stdin, 'git commit-graph write' checks that each OID refers to an object that is indeed a commit. This is convenient to make sure that the given input is well-formed, but can sometimes be undesirable. For example, server operators may wish to feed the refnames that were updated during a push to 'git commit-graph write --input=stdin-commits', and silently discard refs that don't point at commits. This can be done by combing the output of 'git for-each-ref' with '--format %(*objecttype)', but this requires opening up a potentially large number of objects. Instead, it is more convenient to feed the updated refs to the commit-graph machinery, and let it throw out refs that don't point to commits. Introduce '--[no-]check-oids' to make such a behavior possible. With '--check-oids' (the default behavior to retain backwards compatibility), 'git commit-graph write' will barf on a non-commit line in its input. With 'no-check-oids', such lines will be silently ignored, making the above possible by specifying this option. No matter which is supplied, 'git commit-graph write' retains the behavior from the previous commit of rejecting non-OID inputs like "HEAD" and "refs/heads/foo" as before. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-15commit-graph.h: replace 'commit_hex' with 'commits'Taylor Blau1-26/+33
The 'write_commit_graph()' function takes in either a string list of pack indices, or a string list of hexadecimal commit OIDs. These correspond to the '--stdin-packs' and '--stdin-commits' mode(s) from 'git commit-graph write'. Using a string_list of hexadecimal commit IDs is not the most efficient use of memory, since we can instead use the 'struct oidset', which is more well-suited for this case. This has another benefit which will become apparent in the following commit. This is that we are about to disambiguate the kinds of errors we produce with '--stdin-commits' into "non-hex input" and "hex-input, but referring to a non-commit object". By having 'write_commit_graph' take in a 'struct oidset *' of commits, we place the burden on the caller (in this case, the builtin) to handle the first case, and the commit-graph machinery can handle the second case. Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-15builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce split strategy 'replace'Taylor Blau1-14/+39
When using split commit-graphs, it is sometimes useful to completely replace the commit-graph chain with a new base. For example, consider a scenario in which a repository builds a new commit-graph incremental for each push. Occasionally (say, after some fixed number of pushes), they may wish to rebuild the commit-graph chain with all reachable commits. They can do so with $ git commit-graph write --reachable but this removes the chain entirely and replaces it with a single commit-graph in 'objects/info/commit-graph'. Unfortunately, this means that the next push will have to move this commit-graph into the first layer of a new chain, and then write its new commits on top. Avoid such copying entirely by allowing the caller to specify that they wish to replace the entirety of their commit-graph chain, while also specifying that the new commit-graph should become the basis of a fresh, length-one chain. This addresses the above situation by making it possible for the caller to instead write: $ git commit-graph write --reachable --split=replace which writes a new length-one chain to 'objects/info/commit-graphs', making the commit-graph incremental generated by the subsequent push relatively cheap by avoiding the aforementioned copy. In order to do this, remove an assumption in 'write_commit_graph_file' that chains are always at least two incrementals long. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-15builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce split strategy 'no-merge'Taylor Blau1-7/+12
In the previous commit, we laid the groundwork for supporting different splitting strategies. In this commit, we introduce the first splitting strategy: 'no-merge'. Passing '--split=no-merge' is useful for callers which wish to write a new incremental commit-graph, but do not want to spend effort condensing the incremental chain [1]. Previously, this was possible by passing '--size-multiple=0', but this no longer the case following 63020f175f (commit-graph: prefer default size_mult when given zero, 2020-01-02). When '--split=no-merge' is given, the commit-graph machinery will never condense an existing chain, and it will always write a new incremental. [1]: This might occur when, for example, a server administrator running some program after each push may want to ensure that each job runs proportional in time to the size of the push, and does not "jump" when the commit-graph machinery decides to trigger a merge. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-06commit-graph: reuse existing Bloom filters during writeGarima Singh1-3/+3
Add logic to a) parse Bloom filter information from the commit graph file and, b) re-use existing Bloom filters. See Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format for the format in which the Bloom filter information is written to the commit graph file. To read Bloom filter for a given commit with lexicographic position 'i' we need to: 1. Read BIDX[i] which essentially gives us the starting index in BDAT for filter of commit i+1. It is essentially the index past the end of the filter of commit i. It is called end_index in the code. 2. For i>0, read BIDX[i-1] which will give us the starting index in BDAT for filter of commit i. It is called the start_index in the code. For the first commit, where i = 0, Bloom filter data starts at the beginning, just past the header in the BDAT chunk. Hence, start_index will be 0. 3. The length of the filter will be end_index - start_index, because BIDX[i] gives the cumulative 8-byte words including the ith commit's filter. We toggle whether Bloom filters should be recomputed based on the compute_if_not_present flag. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-06commit-graph: write Bloom filters to commit graph fileGarima Singh1-1/+112
Update the technical documentation for commit-graph-format with the formats for the Bloom filter index (BIDX) and Bloom filter data (BDAT) chunks. Write the computed Bloom filters information to the commit graph file using this format. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-01commit-graph: fix buggy --expire-time optionDerrick Stolee1-1/+1
The commit-graph builtin has an --expire-time option that takes a datetime using OPT_EXPIRY_DATE(). However, the implementation inside expire_commit_graphs() was treating a non-zero value as a number of seconds to subtract from "now". Update t5323-split-commit-graph.sh to demonstrate the correct value of the --expire-time option by actually creating a crud .graph file with mtime earlier than the expire time. Instead of using a super- early time (1980) we use an explicit, and recent, time. Using test-tool chmtime to create two files on either end of an exact second, we create a test that catches this failure no matter the current time. Using a fixed date is more portable than trying to format a relative date string into the --expiry-date input. I noticed this when inspecting some Scalar repos that had an excess number of commit-graph files. In Scalar, we were using this second interpretation by using "--expire-time=3600" to mean "delete graphs older than one hour ago" to avoid deleting a commit-graph that a foreground process may be trying to load. Also I noticed that the help text was copied from the --max-commits option. Fix that help text. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30commit-graph: examine commits by generation numberGarima Singh1-3/+30
When running 'git commit-graph write --changed-paths', we sort the commits by pack-order to save time when computing the changed-paths bloom filters. This does not help when finding the commits via the '--reachable' flag. If not using pack-order, then sort by generation number before examining the diff. Commits with similar generation are more likely to have many trees in common, making the diff faster. On the Linux kernel repository, this change reduced the computation time for 'git commit-graph write --reachable --changed-paths' from 3m00s to 1m37s. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30commit-graph: examine changed-path objects in pack orderJeff King1-3/+35
Looking at the diff of commit objects in pack order is much faster than in sha1 order, as it gives locality to the access of tree deltas (whereas sha1 order is effectively random). Unfortunately the commit-graph code sorts the commits (several times, sometimes as an oid and sometimes a pointer-to-commit), and we ultimately traverse in sha1 order. Instead, let's remember the position at which we see each commit, and traverse in that order when looking at bloom filters. This drops my time for "git commit-graph write --changed-paths" in linux.git from ~4 minutes to ~1.5 minutes. Probably the "--reachable" code path would want something similar. Or alternatively, we could use a different data structure (either a hash, or maybe even just a bit in "struct commit") to keep track of which oids we've seen, etc instead of sorting. And then we could keep the original order. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30commit-graph: compute Bloom filters for changed pathsGarima Singh1-1/+31
Add new COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHANGED_PATHS flag that makes Git compute Bloom filters for the paths that changed between a commit and it's first parent, for each commit in the commit-graph. This computation is done on a commit-by-commit basis. We will write these Bloom filters to the commit-graph file, to store this data on disk, in the next change in this series. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30commit-graph: define and use MAX_NUM_CHUNKSGarima Singh1-2/+3
This is a minor cleanup to make it easier to change the number of chunks being written to the commit graph. Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-05Merge branch 'rs/commit-graph-code-simplification'Junio C Hamano1-6/+2
Code simplfication. * rs/commit-graph-code-simplification: commit-graph: use progress title directly
2020-02-27commit-graph: use progress title directlyRené Scharfe1-6/+2
merge_commit_graphs() copies the (translated) progress message into a strbuf and passes the copy to start_delayed_progress() at each loop iteration. The latter function takes a string pointer, so let's avoid the detour and hand the string to it directly. That's shorter, simpler and slightly more efficient. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-04commit-graph.h: use odb in 'load_commit_graph_one_fd_st'Taylor Blau1-11/+10
Apply a similar treatment as in the previous patch to pass a 'struct object_directory *' through the 'load_commit_graph_one_fd_st' initializer, too. This prevents a potential bug where a pointer comparison is made to a NULL 'g->odb', which would cause the commit-graph machinery to think that a pair of commit-graphs belonged to different alternates when in fact they do not (i.e., in the case of no '--object-dir'). Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-04commit-graph.c: remove path normalization, comparisonTaylor Blau1-28/+19
As of the previous patch, all calls to 'commit-graph.c' functions which perform path normalization (for e.g., 'get_commit_graph_filename()') are of the form 'ctx->odb->path', which is always in normalized form. Now that there are no callers passing non-normalized paths to these functions, ensure that future callers are bound by the same restrictions by making these functions take a 'struct object_directory *' instead of a 'const char *'. To match, replace all calls with arguments of the form 'ctx->odb->path' with 'ctx->odb' To recover the path, functions that perform path manipulation simply use 'odb->path'. Further, avoid string comparisons with arguments of the form 'odb->path', and instead prefer raw pointer comparisons, which accomplish the same effect, but are far less brittle. This has a pleasant side-effect of making these functions much more robust to paths that cannot be normalized by 'normalize_path_copy()', i.e., because they are outside of the current working directory. For example, prior to this patch, Valgrind reports that the following uninitialized memory read [1]: $ ( cd t && GIT_DIR=../.git valgrind git rev-parse HEAD^ ) because 'normalize_path_copy()' can't normalize '../.git' (since it's relative to but above of the current working directory) [2]. By using a 'struct object_directory *' directly, 'get_commit_graph_filename()' does not need to normalize, because all paths are relative to the current working directory since they are always read from the '->path' of an object directory. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20191027042116.GA5801@sigill.intra.peff.net. [2]: The bug here is that 'get_commit_graph_filename()' returns the result of 'normalize_path_copy()' without checking the return value. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-04commit-graph.h: store object directory in 'struct commit_graph'Taylor Blau1-17/+21
In a previous patch, the 'char *object_dir' in 'struct commit_graph' was replaced with a 'struct object_directory'. This patch applies the same treatment to 'struct commit_graph', which is another intermediate step towards getting rid of all path normalization in 'commit-graph.c'. Instead of taking a 'char *object_dir', functions that construct a 'struct commit_graph' now take a 'struct object_directory *'. Any code that needs an object directory path use '->path' instead. This ensures that all calls to functions that perform path normalization are given arguments which do not themselves require normalization. This prepares those functions to drop their normalization entirely, which will occur in the subsequent patch. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-04commit-graph.h: store an odb in 'struct write_commit_graph_context'Taylor Blau1-25/+16
There are lots of places in 'commit-graph.h' where a function either has (or almost has) a full 'struct object_directory *', accesses '->path', and then throws away the rest of the struct. This can cause headaches when comparing the locations of object directories across alternates (e.g., in the case of deciding if two commit-graph layers can be merged). These paths are normalized with 'normalize_path_copy()' which mitigates some comparison issues, but not all [1]. Replace usage of 'char *object_dir' with 'odb->path' by storing a 'struct object_directory *' in the 'write_commit_graph_context' structure. This is an intermediate step towards getting rid of all path normalization in 'commit-graph.c'. Resolving a user-provided '--object-dir' argument now requires that we compare it to the known alternates for equality. Prior to this patch, an unknown '--object-dir' argument would silently exit with status zero. This can clearly lead to unintended behavior, such as verifying commit-graphs that aren't in a repository's own object store (or one of its alternates), or causing a typo to mask a legitimate commit-graph verification failure. Make this error non-silent by 'die()'-ing when the given '--object-dir' does not match any known alternate object store. [1]: In my testing, for example, I can get one side of the commit-graph code to fill object_dir with "./objects" and the other with just "objects". Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-06Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-set-size-mult'Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
The code to write split commit-graph file(s) upon fetching computed bogus value for the parameter used in splitting the resulting files, which has been corrected. * ds/commit-graph-set-size-mult: commit-graph: prefer default size_mult when given zero
2020-01-02commit-graph: prefer default size_mult when given zeroDerrick Stolee1-1/+3
In 50f26bd ("fetch: add fetch.writeCommitGraph config setting", 2019-09-02), the fetch builtin added the capability to write a commit-graph using the "--split" feature. This feature creates multiple commit-graph files, and those can merge based on a set of "split options" including a size multiple. The default size multiple is 2, which intends to provide a log_2 N depth of the commit-graph chain where N is the number of commits. However, I noticed during dogfooding that my commit-graph chains were becoming quite large when left only to builds by 'git fetch'. It turns out that in split_graph_merge_strategy(), we default the size_mult variable to 2 except we override it with the context's split_opts if they exist. In builtin/fetch.c, we create such a split_opts, but do not populate it with values. This problem is due to two failures: 1. It is unclear that we can add the flag COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_SPLIT with a NULL split_opts. 2. If we have a non-NULL split_opts, then we override the default values even if a zero value is given. Correct both of these issues. First, do not override size_mult when the options provide a zero value. Second, stop creating a split_opts in the fetch builtin. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-10Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-delay-gen-progress'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
One kind of progress messages were always given during commit-graph generation, instead of following the "if it takes more than two seconds, show progress" pattern, which has been corrected. * ds/commit-graph-delay-gen-progress: commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY
2019-12-01Merge branch 'en/doc-typofix'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Docfix. * en/doc-typofix: Fix spelling errors in no-longer-updated-from-upstream modules multimail: fix a few simple spelling errors sha1dc: fix trivial comment spelling error Fix spelling errors in test commands Fix spelling errors in messages shown to users Fix spelling errors in names of tests Fix spelling errors in comments of testcases Fix spelling errors in code comments Fix spelling errors in documentation outside of Documentation/ Documentation: fix a bunch of typos, both old and new
2019-12-01Merge branch 'jk/cleanup-object-parsing-and-fsck'Junio C Hamano1-3/+0
Crufty code and logic accumulated over time around the object parsing and low-level object access used in "git fsck" have been cleaned up. * jk/cleanup-object-parsing-and-fsck: (23 commits) fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tree" for fsck_tree() fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct commit" for fsck_commit() fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tag" for fsck_tag() fsck: rename vague "oid" local variables fsck: don't require an object struct in verify_headers() fsck: don't require an object struct for fsck_ident() fsck: drop blob struct from fsck_finish() fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct blob" for fsck_blob() fsck: don't require an object struct for report() fsck: only require an oid for skiplist functions fsck: only provide oid/type in fsck_error callback fsck: don't require object structs for display functions fsck: use oids rather than objects for object_name API fsck_describe_object(): build on our get_object_name() primitive fsck: unify object-name code fsck: require an actual buffer for non-blobs fsck: stop checking tag->tagged fsck: stop checking commit->parent counts fsck: stop checking commit->tree value commit, tag: don't set parsed bit for parse failures ...
2019-11-27commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress()Derrick Stolee1-1/+1
When writing a commit-graph, we show progress along several commit walks. When we use start_delayed_progress(), the progress line will only appear if that step takes a decent amount of time. However, one place was missed: computing generation numbers. This is normally a very fast operation as all commits have been parsed in a previous step. But, this is showing up for all users no matter how few commits are being added. The tests that check for the progress output have already been updated to use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 to force the expected output. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reported-by: ryenus <ryenus@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-10Fix spelling errors in code commentsElijah Newren1-1/+1
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-04Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-on-fetch'Junio C Hamano1-4/+7
Regression fix. * ds/commit-graph-on-fetch: commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetch t5510-fetch.sh: demonstrate fetch.writeCommitGraph bug
2019-10-28commit, tag: don't set parsed bit for parse failuresJeff King1-3/+0
If we can't parse a commit, then parse_commit() will return an error code. But it _also_ sets the "parsed" flag, which tells us not to bother trying to re-parse the object. That means that subsequent parses have no idea that the information in the struct may be bogus. I.e., doing this: parse_commit(commit); ... if (parse_commit(commit) < 0) die("commit is broken"); will never trigger the die(). The second parse_commit() will see the "parsed" flag and quietly return success. There are two obvious ways to fix this: 1. Stop setting "parsed" until we've successfully parsed. 2. Keep a second "corrupt" flag to indicate that we saw an error (and when the parsed flag is set, return 0/-1 depending on the corrupt flag). This patch does option 1. The obvious downside versus option 2 is that we might continually re-parse a broken object. But in practice, corruption like this is rare, and we typically die() or return an error in the caller. So it's OK not to worry about optimizing for corruption. And it's much simpler: we don't need to use an extra bit in the object struct, and callers which check the "parsed" flag don't need to learn about the corrupt bit, too. There's no new test here, because this case is already covered in t5318. Note that we do need to update the expected message there, because we now detect the problem in the return from "parse_commit()", and not with a separate check for a NULL tree. In fact, we can now ditch that explicit tree check entirely, as we're covered robustly by this change (and the previous recent change to treat a NULL tree as a parse error). We'll also give tags the same treatment. I don't know offhand of any cases where the problem can be triggered (it implies somebody ignoring a parse error earlier in the process), but consistently returning an error should cause the least surprise. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-25commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetchDerrick Stolee1-4/+7
The previous commit includes a failing test for an issue around fetch.writeCommitGraph and fetching in a repo with a submodule. Here, we fix that bug and set the test to "test_expect_success". The problem arises with this set of commands when the remote repo at <url> has a submodule. Note that --recurse-submodules is not needed to demonstrate the bug. $ git clone <url> test $ cd test $ git -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true fetch origin Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (12/12), done. BUG: commit-graph.c:886: missing parent <hash1> for commit <hash2> Aborted (core dumped) As an initial fix, I converted the code in builtin/fetch.c that calls write_commit_graph_reachable() to instead launch a "git commit-graph write --reachable --split" process. That code worked, but is not how we want the feature to work long-term. That test did demonstrate that the issue must be something to do with internal state of the 'git fetch' process. The write_commit_graph() method in commit-graph.c ensures the commits we plan to write are "closed under reachability" using close_reachable(). This method walks from the input commits, and uses the UNINTERESTING flag to mark which commits have already been visited. This allows the walk to take O(N) time, where N is the number of commits, instead of O(P) time, where P is the number of paths. (The number of paths can be exponential in the number of commits.) However, the UNINTERESTING flag is used in lots of places in the codebase. This flag usually means some barrier to stop a commit walk, such as in revision-walking to compare histories. It is not often cleared after the walk completes because the starting points of those walks do not have the UNINTERESTING flag, and clear_commit_marks() would stop immediately. This is happening during a 'git fetch' call with a remote. The fetch negotiation is comparing the remote refs with the local refs and marking some commits as UNINTERESTING. I tested running clear_commit_marks_many() to clear the UNINTERESTING flag inside close_reachable(), but the tips did not have the flag, so that did nothing. It turns out that the calculate_changed_submodule_paths() method is at fault. Thanks, Peff, for pointing out this detail! More specifically, for each submodule, the collect_changed_submodules() runs a revision walk to essentially do file-history on the list of submodules. That revision walk marks commits UNININTERESTING if they are simplified away by not changing the submodule. Instead, I finally arrived on the conclusion that I should use a flag that is not used in any other part of the code. In commit-reach.c, a number of flags were defined for commit walk algorithms. The REACHABLE flag seemed like it made the most sense, and it seems it was not actually used in the file. The REACHABLE flag was used in early versions of commit-reach.c, but was removed by 4fbcca4 (commit-reach: make can_all_from_reach... linear, 2018-07-20). Add the REACHABLE flag to commit-graph.c and use it instead of UNINTERESTING in close_reachable(). This fixes the bug in manual testing. Reported-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Szeder Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-09Merge branch 'ah/cleanups'Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
Miscellaneous code clean-ups. * ah/cleanups: git_mkstemps_mode(): replace magic numbers with computed value wrapper: use a loop instead of repetitive statements diffcore-break: use a goto instead of a redundant if statement commit-graph: remove a duplicate assignment
2019-10-07Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-harden'Junio C Hamano1-2/+9
The code to parse and use the commit-graph file has been made more robust against corrupted input. * tb/commit-graph-harden: commit-graph.c: handle corrupt/missing trees commit-graph.c: handle commit parsing errors t/t5318: introduce failing 'git commit-graph write' tests
2019-10-07Merge branch 'gs/commit-graph-progress'Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
* gs/commit-graph-progress: commit-graph: add --[no-]progress to write and verify
2019-10-07Merge branch 'rs/commit-graph-use-list-count'Junio C Hamano1-11/+6
Code cleanup. * rs/commit-graph-use-list-count: commit-graph: use commit_list_count()
2019-10-07Merge branch 'jk/disable-commit-graph-during-upload-pack'Junio C Hamano1-3/+15
The "upload-pack" (the counterpart of "git fetch") needs to disable commit-graph when responding to a shallow clone/fetch request, but the way this was done made Git panic, which has been corrected. * jk/disable-commit-graph-during-upload-pack: upload-pack: disable commit graph more gently for shallow traversal commit-graph: bump DIE_ON_LOAD check to actual load-time
2019-10-07Merge branch 'jk/commit-graph-cleanup'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
A pair of small fixups to "git commit-graph" have been applied. * jk/commit-graph-cleanup: commit-graph: turn off save_commit_buffer commit-graph: don't show progress percentages while expanding reachable commits
2019-10-02commit-graph: remove a duplicate assignmentAlex Henrie1-2/+3
Leave the variable 'g' uninitialized before it is set just before its first use in front of a loop, which is a much more appropriate place to indicate what it is used for. Also initialize the variable 'num_commits' just before the loop instead of at the beginning of the function for the same reason. Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-18commit-graph: add --[no-]progress to write and verifyGarima Singh1-2/+4
Add --[no-]progress to git commit-graph write and verify. The progress feature was introduced in 7b0f229 ("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17) but the ability to opt-out was overlooked. Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-16commit-graph: use commit_list_count()René Scharfe1-11/+6
Let commit_list_count() count the number of parents instead of duplicating it. Also store the result in an unsigned int, as that's what the function returns, and the count is never negative. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-12upload-pack: disable commit graph more gently for shallow traversalJeff King1-0/+12
When the client has asked for certain shallow options like "deepen-since", we do a custom rev-list walk that pretends to be shallow. Before doing so, we have to disable the commit-graph, since it is not compatible with the shallow view of the repository. That's handled by 829a321569 (commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow walk, 2018-08-20). That commit literally closes and frees our repo->objects->commit_graph struct. That creates an interesting problem for commits that have _already_ been parsed using the commit graph. Their commit->object.parsed flag is set, their commit->graph_pos is set, but their commit->maybe_tree may still be NULL. When somebody later calls repo_get_commit_tree(), we see that we haven't loaded the tree oid yet and try to get it from the commit graph. But since it has been freed, we segfault! So the root of the issue is a data dependency between the commit's lazy-load of the tree oid and the fact that the commit graph can go away mid-process. How can we resolve it? There are a couple of general approaches: 1. The obvious answer is to avoid loading the tree from the graph when we see that it's NULL. But then what do we return for the tree oid? If we return NULL, our caller in do_traverse() will rightly complain that we have no tree. We'd have to fallback to loading the actual commit object and re-parsing it. That requires teaching parse_commit_buffer() to understand re-parsing (i.e., not starting from a clean slate and not leaking any allocated bits like parent list pointers). 2. When we close the commit graph, walk through the set of in-memory objects and clear any graph_pos pointers. But this means we also have to "unparse" any such commits so that we know they still need to open the commit object to fill in their trees. So it's no less complicated than (1), and is more expensive (since we clear objects we might not later need). 3. Stop freeing the commit-graph struct. Continue to let it be used for lazy-loads of tree oids, but let upload-pack specify that it shouldn't be used for further commit parsing. 4. Push the whole shallow rev-list out to its own sub-process, with the commit-graph disabled from the start, giving it a clean memory space to work from. I've chosen (3) here. Options (1) and (2) would work, but are non-trivial to implement. Option (4) is more expensive, and I'm not sure how complicated it is (shelling out for the actual rev-list part is easy, but we do then parse the resulting commits internally, and I'm not clear which parts need to be handling shallow-ness). The new test in t5500 triggers this segfault, but see the comments there for how horribly intimate it has to be with how both upload-pack and commit graphs work. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-12commit-graph: bump DIE_ON_LOAD check to actual load-timeJeff King1-4/+4
Commit 43d3561805 (commit-graph write: don't die if the existing graph is corrupt, 2019-03-25) added an environment variable we use only in the test suite, $GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD. But it put the check for this variable at the very top of prepare_commit_graph(), which is called every time we want to use the commit graph. Most importantly, it comes _before_ we check the fast-path "did we already try to load?", meaning we end up calling getenv() for every single use of the commit graph, rather than just when we load. getenv() is allowed to have unexpected side effects, but that shouldn't be a problem here; we're lazy-loading the graph so it's clear that at least _one_ invocation of this function is going to call it. But it is inefficient. getenv() typically has to do a linear search through the environment space. We could memoize the call, but it's simpler still to just bump the check down to the actual loading step. That's fine for our sole user in t5318, and produces this minor real-world speedup: [before] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 1.460 s ± 0.017 s [User: 1.174 s, System: 0.285 s] Range (min … max): 1.440 s … 1.491 s 10 runs [after] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 1.391 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.118 s, System: 0.273 s] Range (min … max): 1.385 s … 1.399 s 10 runs Of course that actual speedup depends on how big your environment is. We can game it like this: for i in $(seq 10000); do export dummy$i=$i done in which case I get: [before] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 6.257 s ± 0.061 s [User: 6.005 s, System: 0.250 s] Range (min … max): 6.174 s … 6.337 s 10 runs [after] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 1.403 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.146 s, System: 0.256 s] Range (min … max): 1.396 s … 1.412 s 10 runs So this is really more about avoiding the pathological case than providing a big real-world speedup. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-09Merge branch 'ds/feature-macros'Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
A mechanism to affect the default setting for a (related) group of configuration variables is introduced. * ds/feature-macros: repo-settings: create feature.experimental setting repo-settings: create feature.manyFiles setting repo-settings: parse core.untrackedCache commit-graph: turn on commit-graph by default t6501: use 'git gc' in quiet mode repo-settings: consolidate some config settings
2019-09-09commit-graph: don't show progress percentages while expanding reachable commitsSZEDER Gábor1-1/+1
Commit 49bbc57a57 (commit-graph write: emit a percentage for all progress, 2019-01-19) was a bit overeager when it added progress percentages to the "Expanding reachable commits in commit graph" phase as well, because most of the time the number of commits that phase has to iterate over is not known in advance and grows significantly, and, consequently, we end up with nonsensical numbers: $ git commit-graph write --reachable Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 138606% (824706/595), done. [...] $ git rev-parse v5.0 | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 81264400% (812644/1), done. [...] Even worse, because the percentage grows so quickly, the progress code outputs much more often than it should (because it ticks every second, or every 1%), slowing the whole process down. My time for "git commit-graph write --reachable" on linux.git went from 13.463s to 12.521s with this patch, ~7% savings. Therefore, don't show progress percentages in the "Expanding reachable commits in commit graph" phase. Note that the current code does sometimes do the right thing, if we picked up all commits initially (e.g., omitting "--reachable" in a fully-packed repository would get the correct count without any parent traversal). So it may be possible to come up with a way to tell when we could use a percentage here. But in the meantime, let's make sure we robustly avoid printing nonsense. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-09commit-graph.c: handle corrupt/missing treesTaylor Blau1-1/+6
Apply similar treatment as in the previous commit to handle an unchecked call to 'get_commit_tree_oid()'. Previously, a NULL return value from this function would be immediately dereferenced with '->hash', and then cause a segfault. Before dereferencing to access the 'hash' member, check the return value of 'get_commit_tree_oid()' to make sure that it is not NULL. To make this check correct, a related change is also needed in 'commit.c', which is to check the return value of 'get_commit_tree' before taking its address. If 'get_commit_tree' returns NULL, we encounter an undefined behavior when taking the address of the return value of 'get_commit_tree' and then taking '->object.oid'. (On my system, this is memory address 0x8, which is obviously wrong). Fix this by making sure that 'get_commit_tree' returns something non-NULL before digging through a structure that is not there, thus preventing a segfault down the line in the commit graph code. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-09commit-graph.c: handle commit parsing errorsTaylor Blau1-1/+3
To write a commit graph chunk, 'write_graph_chunk_data()' takes a list of commits to write and parses each one before writing the necessary data, and continuing on to the next commit in the list. Since the majority of these commits are not parsed ahead of time (an exception is made for the *last* commit in the list, which is parsed early within 'copy_oids_to_commits'), it is possible that calling 'parse_commit_no_graph()' on them may return an error. Failing to catch these errors before de-referencing later calls can result in a undefined memory access and a SIGSEGV. One such example of this is 'get_commit_tree_oid()', which expects a parsed object as its input (in this case, the commit-graph code passes '*list'). If '*list' causes a parse error, the subsequent call will fail. Prevent such an issue by checking the return value of 'parse_commit_no_graph()' to avoid passing an unparsed object to a function which expects a parsed object, thus preventing a segfault. It is worth noting that this fix is really skirting around the issue in object.c's 'parse_object()', which makes it difficult to tell how corrupt an object is without digging into it. Presumably one could change the meaning of 'parse_object' returns, but this would require adjusting each callsite accordingly. Instead of that, add an additional check to the object parsed. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-22Merge branch 'sg/commit-graph-validate'Junio C Hamano1-17/+23
The code to write commit-graph over given commit object names has been made a bit more robust. * sg/commit-graph-validate: commit-graph: error out on invalid commit oids in 'write --stdin-commits' commit-graph: turn a group of write-related macro flags into an enum t5318-commit-graph: use 'test_expect_code'
2019-08-13repo-settings: consolidate some config settingsDerrick Stolee1-3/+3
There are a few important config settings that are not loaded during git_default_config. These are instead loaded on-demand. Centralize these config options to a single scan, and store all of the values in a repo_settings struct. The values for each setting are initialized as negative to indicate "unset". This centralization will be particularly important in a later change to introduce "meta" config settings that change the defaults for these config settings. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-09Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-incremental'Junio C Hamano1-5/+7
Leakfix. * ds/commit-graph-incremental: commit-graph: release strbufs after use
2019-08-07commit-graph: release strbufs after useRené Scharfe1-5/+7
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05commit-graph: fix bug around octopus mergesDerrick Stolee1-1/+1
In 1771be90 "commit-graph: merge commit-graph chains" (2019-06-18), the method sort_and_scan_merged_commits() was added to merge the commit lists of two commit-graph files in the incremental format. Unfortunately, there was an off-by-one error in that method around incrementing num_extra_edges, which leads to an incorrect offset for the base graph chunk. When we store an octopus merge in the commit-graph file, we store the first parent in the normal place, but use the second parent position to point into the "extra edges" chunk where the remaining parents exist. This means we should be adding "num_parents - 1" edges to this list, not "num_parents - 2". That is the basic error. The reason this was not caught in the test suite is more subtle. In 5324-split-commit-graph.sh, we test creating an octopus merge and adding it to the tip of a commit-graph chain, then verify the result. This _should_ have caught the problem, except that when we load the commit-graph files we were overly careful to not fail when the commit-graph chain does not match. This care was on purpose to avoid race conditions as one process reads the chain and another process modifies it. In such a case, the reading process outputs the following message to stderr: warning: commit-graph chain does not match These warnings are output in the test suite, but ignored. By checking the stderr of `git commit-graph verify` to include the expected progress output, it will now catch this error. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05commit-graph: error out on invalid commit oids in 'write --stdin-commits'SZEDER Gábor1-12/+17
While 'git commit-graph write --stdin-commits' expects commit object ids as input, it accepts and silently skips over any invalid commit object ids, and still exits with success: # nonsense $ echo not-a-commit-oid | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits $ echo $? 0 # sometimes I forgot that refs are not good... $ echo HEAD | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits $ echo $? 0 # valid tree OID, but not a commit OID $ git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits $ echo $? 0 $ ls -l .git/objects/info/commit-graph ls: cannot access '.git/objects/info/commit-graph': No such file or directory Check that all input records are indeed valid commit object ids and return with error otherwise, the same way '--stdin-packs' handles invalid input; see e103f7276f (commit-graph: return with errors during write, 2019-06-12). Note that it should only return with error when encountering an invalid commit object id coming from standard input. However, '--reachable' uses the same code path to process object ids pointed to by all refs, and that includes tag object ids as well, which should still be skipped over. Therefore add a new flag to 'enum commit_graph_write_flags' and a corresponding field to 'struct write_commit_graph_context', so we can differentiate between those two cases. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05commit-graph: turn a group of write-related macro flags into an enumSZEDER Gábor1-5/+6
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-19Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-incremental'Junio C Hamano1-49/+774
The commits in a repository can be described by multiple commit-graph files now, which allows the commit-graph files to be updated incrementally. * ds/commit-graph-incremental: commit-graph: test verify across alternates commit-graph: normalize commit-graph filenames commit-graph: test --split across alternate without --split commit-graph: test octopus merges with --split commit-graph: clean up chains after flattened write commit-graph: verify chains with --shallow mode commit-graph: create options for split files commit-graph: expire commit-graph files commit-graph: allow cross-alternate chains commit-graph: merge commit-graph chains commit-graph: add --split option to builtin commit-graph: write commit-graph chains commit-graph: rearrange chunk count logic commit-graph: add base graphs chunk commit-graph: load commit-graph chains commit-graph: rename commit_compare to oid_compare commit-graph: prepare for commit-graph chains commit-graph: document commit-graph chains
2019-07-09Merge branch 'jk/oidhash'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code clean-up to remove hardcoded SHA-1 hash from many places. * jk/oidhash: hashmap: convert sha1hash() to oidhash() hash.h: move object_id definition from cache.h khash: rename oid helper functions khash: drop sha1-specific map types pack-bitmap: convert khash_sha1 maps into kh_oid_map delta-islands: convert island_marks khash to use oids khash: rename kh_oid_t to kh_oid_set khash: drop broken oid_map typedef object: convert create_object() to use object_id object: convert internal hash_obj() to object_id object: convert lookup_object() to use object_id object: convert lookup_unknown_object() to use object_id pack-objects: convert locate_object_entry_hash() to object_id pack-objects: convert packlist_find() to use object_id pack-bitmap-write: convert some helpers to use object_id upload-pack: rename a "sha1" variable to "oid" describe: fix accidental oid/hash type-punning
2019-07-09Merge branch 'ds/close-object-store'Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
The commit-graph file is now part of the "files that the runtime may keep open file descriptors on, all of which would need to be closed when done with the object store", and the file descriptor to an existing commit-graph file now is closed before "gc" finalizes a new instance to replace it. * ds/close-object-store: packfile: rename close_all_packs to close_object_store packfile: close commit-graph in close_all_packs commit-graph: use raw_object_store when closing
2019-07-09Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-write-refactor'Junio C Hamano1-271/+336
Renamed from commit-graph-format-v2 and changed scope. * ds/commit-graph-write-refactor: commit-graph: extract write_commit_graph_file() commit-graph: extract copy_oids_to_commits() commit-graph: extract count_distinct_commits() commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_all_packs() commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_commit_hex() commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_packs() commit-graph: create write_commit_graph_context commit-graph: remove Future Work section commit-graph: collapse parameters into flags commit-graph: return with errors during write commit-graph: fix the_repository reference
2019-06-20object: convert create_object() to use object_idJeff King1-1/+1
There are no callers left of create_object() that aren't just passing us the "hash" member of a "struct object_id". Let's take the whole struct, which gets us closer to removing all raw sha1 variables. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: normalize commit-graph filenamesDerrick Stolee1-7/+23
When writing commit-graph files, we append path data to an object directory, which may be specified by the user via the '--object-dir' option. If the user supplies a trailing slash, or some other alternative path format, the resulting path may be usable for writing to the correct location. However, when expiring graph files from the <obj-dir>/info/commit-graphs directory during a write, we need to compare paths with exact string matches. Normalize the commit-graph filenames to avoid ambiguity. This creates extra allocations, but this is a constant multiple of the number of commit-graph files, which should be a number in the single digits. Further normalize the object directory in the context. Due to a comparison between g->obj_dir and ctx->obj_dir in split_graph_merge_strategy(), a trailing slash would prevent any merging of layers within the same object directory. The check is there to ensure we do not merge across alternates. Update the tests to include a case with this trailing slash problem. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: merge commit-graph chainsDerrick Stolee1-33/+147
When searching for a commit in a commit-graph chain of G graphs with N commits, the search takes O(G log N) time. If we always add a new tip graph with every write, the linear G term will start to dominate and slow the lookup process. To keep lookups fast, but also keep most incremental writes fast, create a strategy for merging levels of the commit-graph chain. The strategy is detailed in the commit-graph design document, but is summarized by these two conditions: 1. If the number of commits we are adding is more than half the number of commits in the graph below, then merge with that graph. 2. If we are writing more than 64,000 commits into a single graph, then merge with all lower graphs. The numeric values in the conditions above are currently constant, but can become config options in a future update. As we merge levels of the commit-graph chain, check that the commits still exist in the repository. A garbage-collection operation may have removed those commits from the object store and we do not want to persist them in the commit-graph chain. This is a non-issue if the 'git gc' process wrote a new, single-level commit-graph file. After we merge levels, the old graph-{hash}.graph files are no longer referenced by the commit-graph-chain file. We will expire these files in a future change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: add --split option to builtinDerrick Stolee1-5/+9
Add a new "--split" option to the 'git commit-graph write' subcommand. This option allows the optional behavior of writing a commit-graph chain. The current behavior will add a tip commit-graph containing any commits that are not in the existing commit-graph or commit-graph chain. Later changes will allow merging the chain and expiring out-dated files. Add a new test script (t5324-split-commit-graph.sh) that demonstrates this behavior. Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: write commit-graph chainsDerrick Stolee1-11/+275
Extend write_commit_graph() to write a commit-graph chain when given the COMMIT_GRAPH_SPLIT flag. This implementation is purposefully simplistic in how it creates a new chain. The commits not already in the chain are added to a new tip commit-graph file. Much of the logic around writing a graph-{hash}.graph file and updating the commit-graph-chain file is the same as the commit-graph file case. However, there are several places where we need to do some extra logic in the split case. Track the list of graph filenames before and after the planned write. This will be more important when we start merging graph files, but it also allows us to upgrade our commit-graph file to the appropriate graph-{hash}.graph file when we upgrade to a chain of commit-graphs. Note that we use the eighth byte of the commit-graph header to store the number of base graph files. This determines the length of the base graphs chunk. A subtle change of behavior with the new logic is that we do not write a commit-graph if we our commit list is empty. This extends to the typical case, which is reflected in t5318-commit-graph.sh. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: clean up chains after flattened writeDerrick Stolee1-3/+9
If we write a commit-graph file without the split option, then we write to $OBJDIR/info/commit-graph and start to ignore the chains in $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/. Unlink the commit-graph-chain file and expire the graph-{hash}.graph files in $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/ during every write. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: rearrange chunk count logicDerrick Stolee1-14/+21
The number of chunks in a commit-graph file can change depending on whether we need the Extra Edges Chunk. We are going to add more optional chunks, and it will be helpful to rearrange this logic around the chunk count before doing so. Specifically, we need to finalize the number of chunks before writing the commit-graph header. Further, we also need to fill out the chunk lookup table dynamically and using "num_chunks" as we add optional chunks is useful for adding optional chunks in the future. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: verify chains with --shallow modeDerrick Stolee1-3/+12
If we wrote a commit-graph chain, we only modified the tip file in the chain. It is valuable to verify what we wrote, but not waste time checking files we did not write. Add a '--shallow' option to the 'git commit-graph verify' subcommand and check that it does not read the base graph in a two-file chain. Making the verify subcommand read from a chain of commit-graphs takes some rearranging of the builtin code. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: add base graphs chunkDerrick Stolee1-0/+22
To quickly verify a commit-graph chain is valid on load, we will read from the new "Base Graphs Chunk" of each file in the chain. This will prevent accidentally loading incorrect data from manually editing the commit-graph-chain file or renaming graph-{hash}.graph files. The commit_graph struct already had an object_id struct "oid", but it was never initialized or used. Add a line to read the hash from the end of the commit-graph file and into the oid member. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: create options for split filesDerrick Stolee1-11/+24
The split commit-graph feature is now fully implemented, but needs some more run-time configurability. Allow direct callers to 'git commit-graph write --split' to specify the values used in the merge strategy and the expire time. Update the documentation to specify these values. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: load commit-graph chainsDerrick Stolee1-6/+106
Prepare the logic for reading a chain of commit-graphs. First, look for a file at $OBJDIR/info/commit-graph. If it exists, then use that file and stop. Next, look for the chain file at $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/commit-graph-chain. If this file exists, then load the hash values as line-separated values in that file and load $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/graph-{hash[i]}.graph for each hash[i] in that file. The file is given in order, so the first hash corresponds to the "base" file and the final hash corresponds to the "tip" file. This implementation assumes that all of the graph-{hash}.graph files are in the same object directory as the commit-graph-chain file. This will be updated in a future change. This change is purposefully simple so we can isolate the different concerns. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: expire commit-graph filesDerrick Stolee1-0/+69
As we merge commit-graph files in a commit-graph chain, we should clean up the files that are no longer used. This change introduces an 'expiry_window' value to the context, which is always zero (for now). We then check the modified time of each graph-{hash}.graph file in the $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs folder and unlink the files that are older than the expiry_window. Since this is always zero, this immediately clears all unused graph files. We will update the value to match a config setting in a future change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: rename commit_compare to oid_compareDerrick Stolee1-2/+2
The helper function commit_compare() actually compares object_id structs, not commits. A future change to commit-graph.c will need to sort commit structs, so rename this function in advance. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: allow cross-alternate chainsDerrick Stolee1-11/+45
In an environment like a fork network, it is helpful to have a commit-graph chain that spans both the base repo and the fork repo. The fork is usually a small set of data on top of the large repo, but sometimes the fork is much larger. For example, git-for-windows/git has almost double the number of commits as git/git because it rebases its commits on every major version update. To allow cross-alternate commit-graph chains, we need a few pieces: 1. When looking for a graph-{hash}.graph file, check all alternates. 2. When merging commit-graph chains, do not merge across alternates. 3. When writing a new commit-graph chain based on a commit-graph file in another object directory, do not allow success if the base file has of the name "commit-graph" instead of "commit-graphs/graph-{hash}.graph". Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: prepare for commit-graph chainsDerrick Stolee1-11/+78
To prepare for a chain of commit-graph files, augment the commit_graph struct to point to a base commit_graph. As we load commits from the graph, we may actually want to read from a base file according to the graph position. The "graph position" of a commit is given by concatenating the lexicographic commit orders from each of the commit-graph files in the chain. This means that we must distinguish two values: * lexicographic index : the position within the lexicographic order in a single commit-graph file. * graph position: the position within the concatenated order of multiple commit-graph files Given the lexicographic index of a commit in a graph, we can compute the graph position by adding the number of commits in the lower-level graphs. To find the lexicographic index of a commit, we subtract the number of commits in lower-level graphs. While here, change insert_parent_or_die() to take a uint32_t position, as that is the type used by its only caller and that makes more sense with the limits in the commit-graph format. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: use raw_object_store when closingDerrick Stolee1-4/+4
The close_commit_graph() method took a repository struct, but then only uses the raw_object_store within. Change the function prototype to make the method more flexible. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: extract write_commit_graph_file()Derrick Stolee1-75/+80
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are extracting helper functions one by one. Extract write_commit_graph_file() that takes all of the information in the context struct and writes the data to a commit-graph file. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: extract copy_oids_to_commits()Derrick Stolee1-25/+32
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are extracting helper functions one by one. Extract copy_oids_to_commits(), which fills the commits list with the distinct commits from the oids list. During this loop, it also counts the number of "extra" edges from octopus merges. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: extract count_distinct_commits()Derrick Stolee1-13/+22
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are extracting helper functions one by one. Extract count_distinct_commits(), which sorts the oids list, then iterates through to find duplicates. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_all_packs()Derrick Stolee1-11/+15
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are extracting helper functions one by one. Extract fill_oids_from_all_packs() that reads all pack-files for commits and fills the oid list in the context. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_commit_hex()Derrick Stolee1-32/+40
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are extracting helper functions one by one. Extract fill_oids_from_commit_hex() that reads the given commit id list and fille the oid list in the context. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_packs()Derrick Stolee1-36/+47
The write_commit_graph() method is too complex, so we are extracting helper functions one by one. This extracts fill_oids_from_packs() that reads the given pack-file list and fills the oid list in the context. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: create write_commit_graph_contextDerrick Stolee1-196/+194
The write_commit_graph() method is too large and complex. To simplify it, we should extract several helper functions. However, we will risk repeating a lot of declarations related to progress incidators and object id or commit lists. Create a new write_commit_graph_context struct that contains the core data structures used in this process. Replace the other local variables with the values inside the context object. Following this change, we will start to lift code segments wholesale out of the write_commit_graph() method and into helper functions. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: collapse parameters into flagsDerrick Stolee1-4/+5
The write_commit_graph() and write_commit_graph_reachable() methods currently take two boolean parameters: 'append' and 'report_progress'. As we update these methods, adding more parameters this way becomes cluttered and hard to maintain. Collapse these parameters into a 'flags' parameter, and adjust the callers to provide flags as necessary. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: return with errors during writeDerrick Stolee1-19/+41
The write_commit_graph() method uses die() to report failure and exit when confronted with an unexpected condition. This use of die() in a library function is incorrect and is now replaced by error() statements and an int return type. Return zero on success and a negative value on failure. Now that we use 'goto cleanup' to jump to the terminal condition on an error, we have new paths that could lead to uninitialized values. New initializers are added to correct for this. The builtins 'commit-graph', 'gc', and 'commit' call these methods, so update them to check the return value. Test that 'git commit-graph write' returns a proper error code when hitting a failure condition in write_commit_graph(). Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-19Merge branch 'js/commit-graph-parse-leakfix'Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
Leakfix. * js/commit-graph-parse-leakfix: commit-graph: fix memory leak
2019-05-09Merge branch 'nd/sha1-name-c-wo-the-repository'Junio C Hamano1-2/+7
Further code clean-up to allow the lowest level of name-to-object mapping layer to work with a passed-in repository other than the default one. * nd/sha1-name-c-wo-the-repository: (34 commits) sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_mb() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from other get_oid_* sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from maybe_die_on_misspelt_object_name submodule-config.c: use repo_get_oid for reading .gitmodules sha1-name.c: add repo_get_oid() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_with_context_1() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from resolve_relative_path() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from diagnose_invalid_index_path() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from handle_one_ref() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_1() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_basic() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_describe_name() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_oid_oneline() sha1-name.c: add repo_interpret_branch_name() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from interpret_branch_mark() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from interpret_nth_prior_checkout() sha1-name.c: remove the_repo from get_short_oid() sha1-name.c: add repo_for_each_abbrev() sha1-name.c: store and use repo in struct disambiguate_state sha1-name.c: add repo_find_unique_abbrev_r() ...
2019-05-07commit-graph: fix memory leakJosh Steadmon1-1/+3
Free the commit graph when verify_commit_graph_lite() reports an error. Credit to OSS-Fuzz for finding this leak. Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-16commit.cocci: refactor code, avoid double rewriteNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-2/+7
"maybe" pointer in 'struct commit' is tricky because it can be lazily initialized to take advantage of commit-graph if available. This makes it not safe to access directly. This leads to a rule in commit.cocci to rewrite 'x->maybe_tree' to 'get_commit_tree(x)'. But that rule alone could lead to incorrectly rewrite assignments, e.g. from x->maybe_tree = yes to get_commit_tree(x) = yes Because of this we have a second rule to revert this effect. Szeder found out that we could do better by performing the assignment rewrite rule first, then the remaining is read-only access and handled by the current first rule. For this to work, we need to transform "x->maybe_tree = y" to something that does NOT contain "x->maybe_tree" to avoid the original first rule. This is where set_commit_tree() comes in. Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01commit-graph: improve & i18n error messagesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-19/+19
Change the error emitted when a commit-graph file is corrupt so that we actually mention the commit-graph, e.g. change errors like: error: improper chunk offset 0000000000385e0c To: error: commit-graph improper chunk offset 0000000000385e0c As discussed in the commits leading up to this one the commit-graph machinery is now used by common commands like "status". If the graph was corrupt we'd often emit some error that gave no indication what was wrong. Now some of them are still cryptic, but they'll at least mention "commit-graph" to give the user a hint as to where to look. While I'm at it mark some of the strings that hadn't been marked for translation. It's clear from the commit history and the code that this was merely forgotten at the time, and wasn't intentional.p5 Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01commit-graph write: don't die if the existing graph is corruptÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-3/+7
When the commit-graph is written we end up calling parse_commit(). This will in turn invoke code that'll consult the existing commit-graph about the commit, if the graph is corrupted we die. We thus get into a state where a failing "commit-graph verify" can't be followed-up with a "commit-graph write" if core.commitGraph=true is set, the graph either needs to be manually removed to proceed, or core.commitGraph needs to be set to "false". Change the "commit-graph write" codepath to use a new parse_commit_no_graph() helper instead of parse_commit() to avoid this. The latter will call repo_parse_commit_internal() with use_commit_graph=1 as seen in 177722b344 ("commit: integrate commit graph with commit parsing", 2018-04-10). Not using the old graph at all slows down the writing of the new graph by some small amount, but is a sensible way to prevent an error in the existing commit-graph from spreading. Just fixing the current issue would be likely to result in code that's inadvertently broken in the future. New code might use the commit-graph at a distance. To detect such cases introduce a "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD" setting used when we do our corruption tests, and test that a "write/verify" combo works after every one of our current test cases where we now detect commit-graph corruption. Some of the code changes here might be strictly unnecessary, e.g. I was unable to find cases where the parse_commit() called from write_graph_chunk_data() didn't exit early due to "item->object.parsed" being true in repo_parse_commit_internal() (before the use_commit_graph=1 has any effect). But let's also convert those cases for good measure, we do not have exhaustive tests for all possible types of commit-graph corruption. This might need to be re-visited if we learn to write the commit-graph incrementally, but probably not. Hopefully we'll just start by finding out what commits we have in total, then read the old graph(s) to see what they cover, and finally write a new graph file with everything that's missing. In that case the new graph writing code just needs to continue to use e.g. a parse_commit() that doesn't consult the existing commit-graphs. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01commit-graph: don't pass filename to load_commit_graph_one_fd_st()Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-4/+3
An earlier change implemented load_commit_graph_one_fd_st() in a way that was bug-compatible with earlier code in terms of the "graph file %s is too small" error message printing out the path to the commit-graph (".git/objects/info/commit-graph"). But change that, because: * A function that takes an already-open file descriptor also needing the filename isn't very intuitive. * The vast majority of errors we might emit when loading the graph come from parse_commit_graph(), which doesn't report the filename. Let's not do that either in this case for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01commit-graph: don't early exit(1) on e.g. "git status"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-12/+30
Make the commit-graph loading code work as a library that returns an error code instead of calling exit(1) when the commit-graph is corrupt. This means that e.g. "status" will now report commit-graph corruption as an "error: [...]" at the top of its output, but then proceed to work normally. This required splitting up the load_commit_graph_one() function so that the code that deals with open()-ing and stat()-ing the graph can now be called independently as open_commit_graph(). This is needed because "commit-graph verify" where the graph doesn't exist isn't an error. See the third paragraph in 283e68c72f ("commit-graph: add 'verify' subcommand", 2018-06-27). There's a bug in that logic where we conflate the intended ENOENT with other errno values (e.g. EACCES), but this change doesn't address that. That'll be addressed in a follow-up change. I'm then splitting most of the logic out of load_commit_graph_one() into load_commit_graph_one_fd_st(), which allows for providing an existing file descriptor and stat information to the loading code. This isn't strictly needed, but it would be redundant and confusing to open() and stat() the file twice for some of the codepaths, this allows for calling open_commit_graph() followed by load_commit_graph_one_fd_st(). The "graph_file" still needs to be passed to that function for the the "graph file %s is too small" error message. This leaves load_commit_graph_one() unused by everything except the internal prepare_commit_graph_one() function, so let's mark it as "static". If someone needs it in the future we can remove the "static" attribute. I could also rewrite its sole remaining user ("prepare_commit_graph_one()") to use load_commit_graph_one_fd_st() instead, but let's leave it at this. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01commit-graph: fix segfault on e.g. "git status"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-9/+34
When core.commitGraph=true is set, various common commands now consult the commit graph. Because the commit-graph code is very trusting of its input data, it's possibly to construct a graph that'll cause an immediate segfault on e.g. "status" (and e.g. "log", "blame", ...). In some other cases where git immediately exits with a cryptic error about the graph being broken. The root cause of this is that while the "commit-graph verify" sub-command exhaustively verifies the graph, other users of the graph simply trust the graph, and will e.g. deference data found at certain offsets as pointers, causing segfaults. This change does the bare minimum to ensure that we don't segfault in the common fill_commit_in_graph() codepath called by e.g. setup_revisions(), to do this instrument the "commit-graph verify" tests to always check if "status" would subsequently segfault. This fixes the following tests which would previously segfault: not ok 50 - detect low chunk count not ok 51 - detect missing OID fanout chunk not ok 52 - detect missing OID lookup chunk not ok 53 - detect missing commit data chunk Those happened because with the commit-graph enabled setup_revisions() would eventually call fill_commit_in_graph(), where e.g. g->chunk_commit_data is used early as an offset (and will be 0x0). With this change we get far enough to detect that the graph is broken, and show an error instead. E.g.: $ git status; echo $? error: commit-graph is missing the Commit Data chunk 1 That also sucks, we should *warn* and not hard-fail "status" just because the commit-graph is corrupt, but fixing is left to a follow-up change. A side-effect of changing the reporting from graph_report() to error() is that we now have an "error: " prefix for these even for "commit-graph verify". Pseudo-diff before/after: $ git commit-graph verify -commit-graph is missing the Commit Data chunk +error: commit-graph is missing the Commit Data chunk Changing that is OK. Various errors it emits now early on are prefixed with "error: ", moving these over and changing the output doesn't break anything. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-02-05Merge branch 'ab/commit-graph-write-progress'Junio C Hamano1-36/+94
The codepath to show progress meter while writing out commit-graph file has been improved. * ab/commit-graph-write-progress: commit-graph write: emit a percentage for all progress commit-graph write: add itermediate progress commit-graph write: remove empty line for readability commit-graph write: add more descriptive progress output commit-graph write: show progress for object search commit-graph write: more descriptive "writing out" output commit-graph write: add "Writing out" progress output commit-graph: don't call write_graph_chunk_extra_edges() unnecessarily commit-graph: rename "large edges" to "extra edges"
2019-02-05Merge branch 'ab/commit-graph-write-optim'Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
The codepath to write out commit-graph has been optimized by following the usual pattern of visiting objects in in-pack order. * ab/commit-graph-write-optim: commit-graph write: use pack order when finding commits
2019-02-05Merge branch 'js/commit-graph-chunk-table-fix'Junio C Hamano1-19/+48
The codepath to read from the commit-graph file attempted to read past the end of it when the file's table-of-contents was corrupt. * js/commit-graph-chunk-table-fix: Makefile: correct example fuzz build commit-graph: fix buffer read-overflow commit-graph, fuzz: add fuzzer for commit-graph
2019-02-05Merge branch 'sb/more-repo-in-api'Junio C Hamano1-16/+24
The in-core repository instances are passed through more codepaths. * sb/more-repo-in-api: (23 commits) t/helper/test-repository: celebrate independence from the_repository path.h: make REPO_GIT_PATH_FUNC repository agnostic commit: prepare free_commit_buffer and release_commit_memory for any repo commit-graph: convert remaining functions to handle any repo submodule: don't add submodule as odb for push submodule: use submodule repos for object lookup pretty: prepare format_commit_message to handle arbitrary repositories commit: prepare logmsg_reencode to handle arbitrary repositories commit: prepare repo_unuse_commit_buffer to handle any repo commit: prepare get_commit_buffer to handle any repo commit-reach: prepare in_merge_bases[_many] to handle any repo commit-reach: prepare get_merge_bases to handle any repo commit-reach.c: allow get_merge_bases_many_0 to handle any repo commit-reach.c: allow remove_redundant to handle any repo commit-reach.c: allow merge_bases_many to handle any repo commit-reach.c: allow paint_down_to_common to handle any repo commit: allow parse_commit* to handle any repo object: parse_object to honor its repository argument object-store: prepare has_{sha1, object}_file to handle any repo object-store: prepare read_object_file to deal with any repo ...
2019-01-29Merge branch 'bc/sha-256'Junio C Hamano1-16/+17
Add sha-256 hash and plug it through the code to allow building Git with the "NewHash". * bc/sha-256: hash: add an SHA-256 implementation using OpenSSL sha256: add an SHA-256 implementation using libgcrypt Add a base implementation of SHA-256 support commit-graph: convert to using the_hash_algo t/helper: add a test helper to compute hash speed sha1-file: add a constant for hash block size t: make the sha1 test-tool helper generic t: add basic tests for our SHA-1 implementation cache: make hashcmp and hasheq work with larger hashes hex: introduce functions to print arbitrary hashes sha1-file: provide functions to look up hash algorithms sha1-file: rename algorithm to "sha1"
2019-01-23commit-graph write: emit a percentage for all progressÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-7/+7
Follow-up 01ca387774 ("commit-graph: split up close_reachable() progress output", 2018-11-19) by making the progress bars in close_reachable() report a completion percentage. This fixes the last occurrence where in the commit graph writing where we didn't report that. The change in 01ca387774 split up the 1x progress bar in close_reachable() into 3x, but left them as dumb counters without a percentage completion. Fixing that is easy, and the only reason it wasn't done already is because that commit was rushed in during the v2.20.0 RC period to fix the unrelated issue of over-reporting commit numbers. See [1] and follow-ups for ML activity at the time and [2] for an alternative approach where the progress bars weren't split up. Now for e.g. linux.git we'll emit: $ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git commit-graph write Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (6529159/6529159), done. Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 100% (815990/815980), done. Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (815983/815983), done. Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (3263932/3263932), done. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181119202300.18670-1-avarab@gmail.com/ 2. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181122153922.16912-11-avarab@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-23commit-graph write: add itermediate progressÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+13
Add progress output to sections of code between "Annotating[...]" and "Computing[...]generation numbers". This can collectively take 5-10 seconds on a large enough repository. On a test repository with I have with ~7 million commits and ~50 million objects we'll now emit: $ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git commit-graph write Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (124763727/124763727), done. Loading known commits in commit graph: 100% (18989461/18989461), done. Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989461), done. Clearing commit marks in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989507), done. Counting distinct commits in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989507), done. Finding extra edges in commit graph: 100% (18989507/18989507), done. Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (7250302/7250302), done. Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (29001208/29001208), done. Whereas on a medium-sized repository such as linux.git these new progress bars won't have time to kick in and as before and we'll still emit output like: $ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git commit-graph write Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (6529159/6529159), done. Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 815990, done. Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (815983/815983), done. Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (3263932/3263932), done. The "Counting distinct commits in commit graph" phase will spend most of its time paused at "0/*" as we QSORT(...) the list. That's not optimal, but at least we don't seem to be stalling anymore most of the time. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-23commit-graph write: remove empty line for readabilityÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+0
Remove the empty line between a QSORT(...) and the subsequent oideq() for-loop. This makes it clearer that the QSORT(...) is being done so that we can run the oideq() loop on adjacent OIDs. Amends code added in 08fd81c9b6 ("commit-graph: implement write_commit_graph()", 2018-04-02). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-23commit-graph write: add more descriptive progress outputÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-7/+18
Make the progress output shown when we're searching for commits to include in the graph more descriptive. This amends code I added in 7b0f229222 ("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17). Now, on linux.git, we'll emit this sort of output in the various modes we support: $ git commit-graph write Finding commits for commit graph among packed objects: 100% (6529159/6529159), done. [...] # Actually we don't emit this since this takes almost no time at # all. But if we did (s/_delayed//) we'd show: $ git for-each-ref --format='%(objectname)' | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits Finding commits for commit graph from 630 refs: 100% (630/630), done. [...] $ (cd .git/objects/pack/ && ls *idx) | git commit-graph write --stdin-pack Finding commits for commit graph in 3 packs: 6529159, done. [...] The middle on of those is going to be the output users might see in practice, since it'll be emitted when they get the commit graph via gc.writeCommitGraph=true. But as noted above you need a really large number of refs for this message to show. It'll show up on a test repository I have with ~165k refs: Finding commits for commit graph from 165203 refs: 100% (165203/165203), done. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-23commit-graph write: show progress for object searchÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+7
Show the percentage progress for the "Finding commits for commit graph" phase for the common case where we're operating on all packs in the repository, as "commit-graph write" or "gc" will do. Before we'd emit on e.g. linux.git with "commit-graph write": Finding commits for commit graph: 6529159, done. [...] And now: Finding commits for commit graph: 100% (6529159/6529159), done. [...] Since the commit graph only includes those commits that are packed (via for_each_packed_object(...)) the approximate_object_count() returns the actual number of objects we're going to process. Still, it is possible due to a race with "gc" or another process maintaining packs that the number of objects we're going to process is lower than what approximate_object_count() reported. In that case we don't want to stop the progress bar short of 100%. So let's make sure it snaps to 100% at the end. The inverse case is also possible and more likely. I.e. that a new pack has been added between approximate_object_count() and for_each_packed_object(). In that case the percentage will go beyond 100%, and we'll do nothing to snap it back to 100% at the end. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-23commit-graph write: more descriptive "writing out" outputÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+10
Make the "Writing out" part of the progress output more descriptive. Depending on the shape of the graph we either make 3 or 4 passes over it. Let's present this information to the user in case they're wondering what this number, which is much larger than their number of commits, has to do with writing out the commit graph. Now e.g. on linux.git we emit: $ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git -C ~/g/linux commit-graph write Finding commits for commit graph: 6529159, done. Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 815990, done. Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (815983/815983), done. Writing out commit graph in 4 passes: 100% (3263932/3263932), done. A note on i18n: Why are we using the Q_() function and passing a number & English text for a singular which'll never be used? Because the plural rules of translated languages may not match those of English, and to use the plural function we need to use this format. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-23commit-graph write: add "Writing out" progress outputÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-9/+30
Add progress output to be shown when we're writing out the commit-graph, this adds to the output already added in 7b0f229222 ("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17). As noted in that commit most of the progress output isn't displayed on small repositories, but before this change we'd noticeably hang for 2-3 seconds at the end on medium sized repositories such as linux.git. Now we'll instead show output like this, and reduce the human-observable times at which we're not producing progress output: $ ~/g/git/git --exec-path=$HOME/g/git -C ~/g/2015-04-03-1M-git commit-graph write Finding commits for commit graph: 13064614, done. Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 1000447, done. Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (1000447/1000447), done. Writing out commit graph: 100% (3001341/3001341), done. This "Writing out" number is 3x or 4x the number of commits, depending on the graph we're processing. A later change will make this explicit to the user. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-23commit-graph: don't call write_graph_chunk_extra_edges() unnecessarilySZEDER Gábor1-1/+2
The optional 'Extra Edge List' chunk of the commit graph file stores parent information for commits with more than two parents. Since the chunk is optional, write_commit_graph() looks through all commits to find those with more than two parents, and then writes the commit graph file header accordingly, i.e. if there are no such commits, then there won't be a 'Extra Edge List' chunk written, only the three mandatory chunks. However, when it later comes to writing actual chunk data, write_commit_graph() unconditionally invokes write_graph_chunk_extra_edges(), even when it was decided earlier that that chunk won't be written. Strictly speaking there is no bug here, because write_graph_chunk_extra_edges() won't write anything if it doesn't find any commits with more than two parents, but then it unnecessarily and in vain looks through all commits once again in search for such commits. Don't call write_graph_chunk_extra_edges() when that chunk won't be written to spare an unnecessary iteration over all commits. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-22commit-graph: rename "large edges" to "extra edges"SZEDER Gábor1-12/+12
The optional 'Large Edge List' chunk of the commit graph file stores parent information for commits with more than two parents, and the names of most of the macros, variables, struct fields, and functions related to this chunk contain the term "large edges", e.g. write_graph_chunk_large_edges(). However, it's not a really great term, as the edges to the second and subsequent parents stored in this chunk are not any larger than the edges to the first and second parents stored in the "main" 'Commit Data' chunk. It's the number of edges, IOW number of parents, that is larger compared to non-merge and "regular" two-parent merge commits. And indeed, two functions in 'commit-graph.c' have a local variable called 'num_extra_edges' that refer to the same thing, and this "extra edges" term is much better at describing these edges. So let's rename all these references to "large edges" in macro, variable, function, etc. names to "extra edges". There is a GRAPH_OCTOPUS_EDGES_NEEDED macro as well; for the sake of consistency rename it to GRAPH_EXTRA_EDGES_NEEDED. We can do so safely without causing any incompatibility issues, because the term "large edges" doesn't come up in the file format itself in any form (the chunk's magic is {'E', 'D', 'G', 'E'}, there is no 'L' in there), but only in the specification text. The string "large edges", however, does come up in the output of 'git commit-graph read' and in tests looking at its input, but that command is explicitly documented as debugging aid, so we can change its output and the affected tests safely. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-22commit-graph write: use pack order when finding commitsÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+4
Slightly optimize the "commit-graph write" step by using FOR_EACH_OBJECT_PACK_ORDER with for_each_object_in_pack(). See commit [1] and [2] for the facility and a similar optimization for "cat-file". On Linux it is around 5% slower to run: echo 1 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches && cat .git/objects/pack/* >/dev/null && git cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch-check --unordered Than the same thing with the "cat" omitted. This is as expected, since we're iterating in pack order and the "cat" is extra work. Before this change the opposite was true of "commit-graph write". We were 6% faster if we first ran "cat" to efficiently populate the FS cache for our sole big pack on linux.git, than if we had populated it via for_each_object_in_pack(). Now we're 3% faster without the "cat" instead. My tests were done on an unloaded Linux 3.10 system with 10 runs for each. Derrick Stolee did his own tests on Windows[3] showing a 2% improvement with a high degree of accuracy. 1. 736eb88fdc ("for_each_packed_object: support iterating in pack-order", 2018-08-10) 2. 0750bb5b51 ("cat-file: support "unordered" output for --batch-all-objects", 2018-08-10) 3. https://public-inbox.org/git/f71fa868-25e8-a9c9-46a6-611b987f1a8f@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-18Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-assert-missing-parents'Junio C Hamano1-6/+11
Tightening error checking in commit-graph writer. * ds/commit-graph-assert-missing-parents: commit-graph: writing missing parents is a BUG
2019-01-15commit-graph: fix buffer read-overflowJosh Steadmon1-2/+12
fuzz-commit-graph identified a case where Git will read past the end of a buffer containing a commit graph if the graph's header has an incorrect chunk count. A simple bounds check in parse_commit_graph() prevents this. Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-15commit-graph, fuzz: add fuzzer for commit-graphJosh Steadmon1-17/+36
Break load_commit_graph_one() into a new function, parse_commit_graph(). The latter function operates on arbitrary buffers, which makes it suitable as a fuzzing target. Since parse_commit_graph() is only called by load_commit_graph_one() (and the fuzzer described below), we omit error messages that would be duplicated by the caller. Adds fuzz-commit-graph.c, which provides a fuzzing entry point compatible with libFuzzer (and possibly other fuzzing engines). Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-14Merge branch 'ab/commit-graph-progress-fix'Junio C Hamano1-3/+10
* ab/commit-graph-progress-fix: commit-graph: split up close_reachable() progress output
2019-01-02commit-graph: writing missing parents is a BUGDerrick Stolee1-6/+11
When writing a commit-graph, we write GRAPH_MISSING_PARENT if the parent's object id does not appear in the list of commits to be written into the commit-graph. This was done as the initial design allowed commits to have missing parents, but the final version requires the commit-graph to be closed under reachability. Thus, this GRAPH_MISSING_PARENT value should never be written. However, there are reasons why it could be written! These range from a bug in the reachable-closure code to a memory error causing the binary search into the list of object ids to fail. In either case, we should fail fast and avoid writing the commit-graph file with bad data. Remove the GRAPH_MISSING_PARENT constant in favor of the constant GRAPH_EDGE_LAST_MASK, which has the same value. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-12-28commit-graph: convert remaining functions to handle any repoStefan Beller1-16/+24
Convert all functions to handle arbitrary repositories in commit-graph.c that are used by functions taking a repository argument already. Notable exclusion is write_commit_graph and its local functions as that only works on the_repository. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-20commit-graph: split up close_reachable() progress outputÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-3/+10
Amend the progress output added in 7b0f229222 ("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17) so that the total numbers it reports aren't higher than the total number of commits anymore. See [1] for a bug report pointing that out. When I added this I wasn't intending to provide an accurate count, but just have some progress output to show the user the command wasn't hanging[2]. But since we are showing numbers, let's make them accurate. The progress descriptions were suggested by Derrick Stolee in [3]. As noted in [2] we are unlikely to show anything except the "Expanding reachable..." message even on fairly large repositories such as linux.git. On a test repository I have with north of 7 million commits all of these are displayed. Two of them don't show up for long, but as noted in [5] future-proofing this for if the loops become more expensive in the future makes sense. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181010203738.GE23446@szeder.dev/ 2. https://public-inbox.org/git/87pnwhea8y.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ 3. https://public-inbox.org/git/f7a0cbee-863c-61d3-4959-5cec8b43c705@gmail.com/ 4. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181015160545.GG19800@szeder.dev/ 5. https://public-inbox.org/git/87murle8da.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-14commit-graph: convert to using the_hash_algobrian m. carlson1-16/+17
Instead of using hard-coded constants for object sizes, use the_hash_algo to look them up. In addition, use a function call to look up the object ID version and produce the correct value. For now, we use version 1, which means to use the default algorithm used in the rest of the repository. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-13sha1-file: use an object_directory for the main object dirJeff King1-4/+1
Our handling of alternate object directories is needlessly different from the main object directory. As a result, many places in the code basically look like this: do_something(r->objects->objdir); for (odb = r->objects->alt_odb_list; odb; odb = odb->next) do_something(odb->path); That gets annoying when do_something() is non-trivial, and we've resorted to gross hacks like creating fake alternates (see find_short_object_filename()). Instead, let's give each raw_object_store a unified list of object_directory structs. The first will be the main store, and everything after is an alternate. Very few callers even care about the distinction, and can just loop over the whole list (and those who care can just treat the first element differently). A few observations: - we don't need r->objects->objectdir anymore, and can just mechanically convert that to r->objects->odb->path - object_directory's path field needs to become a real pointer rather than a FLEX_ARRAY, in order to fill it with expand_base_dir() - we'll call prepare_alt_odb() earlier in many functions (i.e., outside of the loop). This may result in us calling it even when our function would be satisfied looking only at the main odb. But this doesn't matter in practice. It's not a very expensive operation in the first place, and in the majority of cases it will be a noop. We call it already (and cache its results) in prepare_packed_git(), and we'll generally check packs before loose objects. So essentially every program is going to call it immediately once per program. Arguably we should just prepare_alt_odb() immediately upon setting up the repository's object directory, which would save us sprinkling calls throughout the code base (and forgetting to do so has been a source of subtle bugs in the past). But I've stopped short of that here, since there are already a lot of other moving parts in this patch. - Most call sites just get shorter. The check_and_freshen() functions are an exception, because they have entry points to handle local and nonlocal directories separately. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-13rename "alternate_object_database" to "object_directory"Jeff King1-5/+5
In preparation for unifying the handling of alt odb's and the normal repo object directory, let's use a more neutral name. This patch is purely mechanical, swapping the type name, and converting any variables named "alt" to "odb". There should be no functional change, but it will reduce the noise in subsequent diffs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-leakfix'Junio C Hamano1-6/+10
Code clean-up. * ds/commit-graph-leakfix: commit-graph: reduce initial oid allocation builtin/commit-graph.c: UNLEAK variables commit-graph: clean up leaked memory during write
2018-10-16Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-with-grafts'Junio C Hamano1-4/+34
The recently introduced commit-graph auxiliary data is incompatible with mechanisms such as replace & grafts that "breaks" immutable nature of the object reference relationship. Disable optimizations based on its use (and updating existing commit-graph) when these incompatible features are in use in the repository. * ds/commit-graph-with-grafts: commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow walk commit-graph: not compatible with uninitialized repo commit-graph: not compatible with grafts commit-graph: not compatible with replace objects test-repository: properly init repo commit-graph: update design document refs.c: upgrade for_each_replace_ref to be a each_repo_ref_fn callback refs.c: migrate internal ref iteration to pass thru repository argument
2018-10-16Merge branch 'ab/commit-graph-progress'Junio C Hamano1-8/+57
Generation of (experimental) commit-graph files have so far been fairly silent, even though it takes noticeable amount of time in a meaningfully large repository. The users will now see progress output. * ab/commit-graph-progress: gc: fix regression in 7b0f229222 impacting --quiet commit-graph verify: add progress output commit-graph write: add progress output
2018-10-07commit-graph: reduce initial oid allocationDerrick Stolee1-1/+1
While writing a commit-graph file, we store the full list of commits in a flat list. We use this list for sorting and ensuring we are closed under reachability. The initial allocation assumed that (at most) one in four objects is a commit. This is a dramatic over-count for many repos, especially large ones. Since we grow the repo dynamically, reduce this count by a factor of eight. We still set it to a minimum of 1024 before allocating. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-07commit-graph: clean up leaked memory during writeDerrick Stolee1-5/+9
The write_commit_graph() method in commit-graph.c leaks some lits and strings during execution. In addition, a list of strings is leaked in write_commit_graph_reachable(). Clean these up so our memory checking is cleaner. Further, if we use a list of pack-files to find the commits, we can leak the packed_git structs after scanning them for commits. Running the following commands demonstrates the leak before and the fix after: * valgrind --leak-check=full ./git commit-graph write --reachable * valgrind --leak-check=full ./git commit-graph write --stdin-packs Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-17Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-tests'Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
We can now optionally run tests with commit-graph enabled. * ds/commit-graph-tests: commit-graph: define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH
2018-09-17Merge branch 'jk/cocci'Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
spatch transformation to replace boolean uses of !hashcmp() to newly introduced oideq() is added, and applied, to regain performance lost due to support of multiple hash algorithms. * jk/cocci: show_dirstat: simplify same-content check read-cache: use oideq() in ce_compare functions convert hashmap comparison functions to oideq() convert "hashcmp() != 0" to "!hasheq()" convert "oidcmp() != 0" to "!oideq()" convert "hashcmp() == 0" to hasheq() convert "oidcmp() == 0" to oideq() introduce hasheq() and oideq() coccinelle: use <...> for function exclusion
2018-09-17Merge branch 'ds/reachable'Junio C Hamano1-0/+18
The code for computing history reachability has been shuffled, obtained a bunch of new tests to cover them, and then being improved. * ds/reachable: commit-reach: correct accidental #include of C file commit-reach: use can_all_from_reach commit-reach: make can_all_from_reach... linear commit-reach: replace ref_newer logic test-reach: test commit_contains test-reach: test can_all_from_reach_with_flags test-reach: test reduce_heads test-reach: test get_merge_bases_many test-reach: test is_descendant_of test-reach: test in_merge_bases test-reach: create new test tool for ref_newer commit-reach: move can_all_from_reach_with_flags upload-pack: generalize commit date cutoff upload-pack: refactor ok_to_give_up() upload-pack: make reachable() more generic commit-reach: move commit_contains from ref-filter commit-reach: move ref_newer from remote.c commit.h: remove method declarations commit-reach: move walk methods from commit.c
2018-09-17commit-graph verify: add progress outputÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+5
For the reasons explained in the "commit-graph write: add progress output" commit leading up to this one, emit progress on "commit-graph verify". Since e0fd51e1d7 ("fsck: verify commit-graph", 2018-06-27) "git fsck" has called this command if core.commitGraph=true, but there's been no progress output to indicate that anything was different. Now there is (on my tiny dotfiles.git repository): $ git -c core.commitGraph=true -C ~/ fsck Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done. Checking objects: 100% (2821/2821), done. dangling blob 5b8bbdb9b788ed90459f505b0934619c17cc605b Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (867/867), done. And on a larger repository, such as the 2015-04-03-1M-git.git test repository: $ time git -c core.commitGraph=true -C ~/g/2015-04-03-1M-git/ commit-graph verify Verifying commits in commit graph: 100% (1000447/1000447), done. real 0m7.813s [...] Since the "commit-graph verify" subcommand is never called from "git gc", we don't have to worry about passing some some "report_progress" progress variable around for this codepath. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>