aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/merge-recursive.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-06-28merge-recursive: convert struct merge_file_info to object_idbrian m. carlson1-19/+20
Convert struct merge_file_info to use struct object_id. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used to implement this, followed by the transformations in object_id.cocci: @@ struct merge_file_info o; @@ - o.sha + o.oid.hash @@ struct merge_file_info *p; @@ - p->sha + p->oid.hash Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-28merge-recursive: convert struct stage_data to use object_idbrian m. carlson1-20/+18
Convert the anonymous struct within struct stage_data to use struct object_id. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used to implement this, followed by the transformations in object_id.cocci: @@ struct stage_data o; expression E1; @@ - o.stages[E1].sha + o.stages[E1].oid.hash @@ struct stage_data *p; expression E1; @@ - p->stages[E1].sha + p->stages[E1].oid.hash Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-28diff: convert struct diff_filespec to struct object_idbrian m. carlson1-49/+58
Convert struct diff_filespec's sha1 member to use a struct object_id called "oid" instead. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used to implement this, followed by the transformations in object_id.cocci: @@ struct diff_filespec o; @@ - o.sha1 + o.oid.hash @@ struct diff_filespec *p; @@ - p->sha1 + p->oid.hash Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-06Merge branch 'bc/object-id'Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Move from unsigned char[20] to struct object_id continues. * bc/object-id: match-trees: convert several leaf functions to use struct object_id tree-walk: convert tree_entry_extract() to use struct object_id struct name_entry: use struct object_id instead of unsigned char sha1[20] match-trees: convert shift_tree() and shift_tree_by() to use object_id test-match-trees: convert to use struct object_id sha1-name: introduce a get_oid() function
2016-04-19match-trees: convert shift_tree() and shift_tree_by() to use object_idbrian m. carlson1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-12merge-recursive: do not check working copy when creating a virtual merge baseElijah Newren1-3/+3
There were a few cases in merge-recursive that could result in a check for the presence of files in the working copy while trying to create a virtual merge base. These were rare and innocuous, but somewhat illogical. The two cases were: * When there was naming conflicts (e.g. a D/F conflict) and we had to pick a new unique name for a file. Since the new name is somewhat arbitrary, it didn't matter that we consulted the working copy to avoid picking a filename it has, but since the virtual merge base is never checked out, it's a waste of time and slightly odd to do so. * When two different files get renamed to the same name (on opposite sides of the merge), we needed to delete the original filenames from the cache and possibly also the working directory. The caller's check for determining whether to delete from the working directory was a call to would_lose_untracked(). It turns out this didn't matter because remove_file() had logic to avoid modifying the working directory when creating a virtual merge base, but there is no reason for the caller to check the working directory in such circumstances. It's a waste of time, if not also a bit weird. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-12merge-recursive: remove duplicate codeElijah Newren1-2/+0
In commit 51931bf (merge-recursive: Improve handling of rename target vs. directory addition, 2011-08-11), I apparently added two lines of code that were immediately duplicated a few lines later. No idea why, other than it seems pretty clear this was a mistake: there is no need to remove the same file twice; removing it once is sufficient...especially since the intervening line was working with a different file entirely. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-24merge-recursive: find-renames resets thresholdFelipe Gonçalves Assis1-1/+3
Make the find-renames option follow the behaviour in git-diff, where it resets the threshold when none is given. So, for instance, "--find-renames=25 --find-renames" should result in the default threshold (50%) instead of 25%. Signed-off-by: Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipegassis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-17merge-recursive: more consistent interfaceFelipe Gonçalves Assis1-1/+4
Add strategy option find-renames, following git-diff interface. This makes the option rename-threshold redundant. Signed-off-by: Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipegassis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-17merge-recursive: option to disable renamesFelipe Gonçalves Assis1-0/+7
The recursive strategy turns on rename detection by default. Add a strategy option to disable rename detection even for exact renames. Signed-off-by: Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipegassis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-20Remove get_object_hash.brian m. carlson1-8/+8
Convert all instances of get_object_hash to use an appropriate reference to the hash member of the oid member of struct object. This provides no functional change, as it is essentially a macro substitution. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-11-20Convert struct object to object_idbrian m. carlson1-7/+7
struct object is one of the major data structures dealing with object IDs. Convert it to use struct object_id instead of an unsigned char array. Convert get_object_hash to refer to the new member as well. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-11-20Add several uses of get_object_hash.brian m. carlson1-8/+8
Convert most instances where the sha1 member of struct object is dereferenced to use get_object_hash. Most instances that are passed to functions that have versions taking struct object_id, such as get_sha1_hex/get_oid_hex, or instances that can be trivially converted to use struct object_id instead, are not converted. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-10-30Merge branch 'jk/delete-modechange-conflict'Junio C Hamano1-2/+6
Merging a branch that removes a path and another that changes the mode bits on the same path should have conflicted at the path, but it didn't and silently favoured the removal. * jk/delete-modechange-conflict: merge: detect delete/modechange conflict t6031: generalize for recursive and resolve strategies t6031: move triple-rename test to t3030
2015-10-26merge: detect delete/modechange conflictJeff King1-2/+6
If one side deletes a file and the other changes its content, we notice and report a conflict. However, if instead of changing the content, we change only the mode, the merge does not notice (and the mode change is silently dropped). The trivial index merge notices the problem and correctly leaves the conflict in the index, but both merge-recursive and merge-one-file will silently resolve this in favor of the deletion. In many cases that is a sane resolution, but we should be punting to the user whenever there is any question. So let's detect and treat this as a conflict (in both strategies). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-05merge-recursive: convert malloc / strcpy to strbufJeff King1-9/+8
This would be a fairly routine use of xstrfmt, except that we need to remember the length of the result to pass to cache_name_pos. So just use a strbuf, which makes this simple. As a bonus, this gets rid of confusing references to "pathlen+1". The "1" is for the trailing slash we added, but that is automatically accounted for in the strbuf's len parameter. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-20use file_exists() to check if a file exists in the worktreeRené Scharfe1-2/+1
Call file_exists() instead of open-coding it. That's shorter, simpler and the intent becomes clearer. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-23merge-recursive: fix memleaksStefan Beller1-0/+3
These string_list instances were allocated by get_renames() and get_unmerged for the sole use of this caller, and the function is responsible for freeing them, not just their contents. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-07Merge branch 'jc/merge-bases'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The get_merge_bases*() API was easy to misuse by careless copy&paste coders, leaving object flags tainted in the commits that needed to be traversed. * jc/merge-bases: get_merge_bases(): always clean-up object flags bisect: clean flags after checking merge bases
2014-12-01tree.c: update read_tree_recursive callback to pass strbuf as baseNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-9/+6
This allows the callback to use 'base' as a temporary buffer to quickly assemble full path "without" extra allocation. The callback has to restore it afterwards of course. Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-30get_merge_bases(): always clean-up object flagsJunio C Hamano1-1/+1
The callers of get_merge_bases() can choose to leave object flags used during the merge-base traversal by passing cleanup=0 as a parameter, but in practice a very few callers can afford to do so (namely, "git merge-base"), as they need to compute merge base in preparation for other processing of their own and they need to see the object without contaminate flags. Change the function signature of get_merge_bases_many() and get_merge_bases() to drop the cleanup parameter, so that the majority of the callers do not have to say ", 1" at the end. Give a new get_merge_bases_many_dirty() API to support only a few callers that know they do not need to spend cycles cleaning up the object flags. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-14Merge branch 'mh/lockfile'Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
The lockfile API and its users have been cleaned up. * mh/lockfile: (38 commits) lockfile.h: extract new header file for the functions in lockfile.c hold_locked_index(): move from lockfile.c to read-cache.c hold_lock_file_for_append(): restore errno before returning get_locked_file_path(): new function lockfile.c: rename static functions lockfile: rename LOCK_NODEREF to LOCK_NO_DEREF commit_lock_file_to(): refactor a helper out of commit_lock_file() trim_last_path_component(): replace last_path_elm() resolve_symlink(): take a strbuf parameter resolve_symlink(): use a strbuf for internal scratch space lockfile: change lock_file::filename into a strbuf commit_lock_file(): use a strbuf to manage temporary space try_merge_strategy(): use a statically-allocated lock_file object try_merge_strategy(): remove redundant lock_file allocation struct lock_file: declare some fields volatile lockfile: avoid transitory invalid states git_config_set_multivar_in_file(): avoid call to rollback_lock_file() dump_marks(): remove a redundant call to rollback_lock_file() api-lockfile: document edge cases commit_lock_file(): rollback lock file on failure to rename ...
2014-10-14Merge branch 'da/include-compat-util-first-in-c'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code clean-up. * da/include-compat-util-first-in-c: cleanups: ensure that git-compat-util.h is included first
2014-10-01lockfile.h: extract new header file for the functions in lockfile.cMichael Haggerty1-0/+1
Move the interface declaration for the functions in lockfile.c from cache.h to a new file, lockfile.h. Add #includes where necessary (and remove some redundant includes of cache.h by files that already include builtin.h). Move the documentation of the lock_file state diagram from lockfile.c to the new header file. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-29Merge branch 'sb/merge-recursive-copy-paste-fix'Junio C Hamano1-5/+1
"git merge-recursive" had a small bug that could have made it mishandle "one side deleted, the other side did not touch it" in a rare corner case, where the other side actually did touch to cause the blob object names to be different but both blobs before and after the change normalize to the same (e.g. correcting mistake to check in a blob with CRLF line endings by replacing it with another blob that records the same contents with LF line endings). * sb/merge-recursive-copy-paste-fix: merge-recursive: remove stale commented debugging code merge-recursive: fix copy-paste mistake
2014-09-23merge-recursive: remove stale commented debugging codeStefan Beller1-4/+0
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-23merge-recursive: fix copy-paste mistakeStefan Beller1-1/+1
The following issue was found by scan.coverity.com (ID: 1049510), and claimed to be likely a copy-paste mistake. Introduced in 331a1838b (2010-07-02, Try normalizing files to avoid delete/modify conflicts when merging), which is quite a long time ago, so I'm rather unsure if it's of any impact or just went unnoticed. The line after the changed line has a comparison of 'o.len' to 'a.len', so we should assume the lengths may be different. I'd be happy to have a test for this bug(?) attached to t6031-merge-recursive.sh, but I did not manage to come up with a test in a reasonable amount of time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-19Merge branch 'rs/export-strbuf-addchars'Junio C Hamano1-3/+1
Code clean-up. * rs/export-strbuf-addchars: strbuf: use strbuf_addchars() for adding a char multiple times strbuf: export strbuf_addchars()
2014-09-15cleanups: ensure that git-compat-util.h is included firstDavid Aguilar1-1/+1
CodingGuidelines states that the first #include in C files should be git-compat-util.h or another header file that includes it, such as cache.h or builtin.h. Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-08strbuf: use strbuf_addchars() for adding a char multiple timesRené Scharfe1-3/+1
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-08-13merge-recursive.c: replace `git_config()` with `git_config_get_int()`Tanay Abhra1-16/+6
Use `git_config_get_int()` instead of `git_config()` to take advantage of the config-set API which provides a cleaner control flow. Signed-off-by: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-23Merge branch 'ta/string-list-init'Junio C Hamano1-6/+3
* ta/string-list-init: replace memset with string-list initializers string-list: add string_list initializer helper function
2014-07-21replace memset with string-list initializersTanay Abhra1-6/+3
Using memset and then manually setting values of the string-list members is not future proof as the internal representation of string-list may change any time. Use `string_list_init()` or STRING_LIST_INIT_* macros instead of memset. Signed-off-by: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16Merge branch 'rs/code-cleaning'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* rs/code-cleaning: fsck: simplify fsck_commit_buffer() by using commit_list_count() commit: use commit_list_append() instead of duplicating its code merge: simplify merge_trivial() by using commit_list_append() use strbuf_addch for adding single characters use strbuf_addbuf for adding strbufs
2014-07-16Merge branch 'nd/split-index'Junio C Hamano1-7/+4
An experiment to use two files (the base file and incremental changes relative to it) to represent the index to reduce I/O cost of rewriting a large index when only small part of the working tree changes. * nd/split-index: (32 commits) t1700: new tests for split-index mode t2104: make sure split index mode is off for the version test read-cache: force split index mode with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX read-tree: note about dropping split-index mode or index version read-tree: force split-index mode off on --index-output rev-parse: add --shared-index-path to get shared index path update-index --split-index: do not split if $GIT_DIR is read only update-index: new options to enable/disable split index mode split-index: strip pathname of on-disk replaced entries split-index: do not invalidate cache-tree at read time split-index: the reading part split-index: the writing part read-cache: mark updated entries for split index read-cache: save deleted entries in split index read-cache: mark new entries for split index read-cache: split-index mode read-cache: save index SHA-1 after reading entry.c: update cache_changed if refresh_cache is set in checkout_entry() cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on prime_cache_tree() cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on cache tree update ...
2014-07-16Merge branch 'jk/commit-buffer-length' into maintJunio C Hamano1-2/+4
A handful of code paths had to read the commit object more than once when showing header fields that are usually not parsed. The internal data structure to keep track of the contents of the commit object has been updated to reduce the need for this double-reading, and to allow the caller find the length of the object. * jk/commit-buffer-length: reuse cached commit buffer when parsing signatures commit: record buffer length in cache commit: convert commit->buffer to a slab commit-slab: provide a static initializer use get_commit_buffer everywhere convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_buffer use get_commit_buffer to avoid duplicate code use get_cached_commit_buffer where appropriate provide helpers to access the commit buffer provide a helper to set the commit buffer provide a helper to free commit buffer sequencer: use logmsg_reencode in get_message logmsg_reencode: return const buffer do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc commit: push commit_index update into alloc_commit_node alloc: include any-object allocations in alloc_report replace dangerous uses of strbuf_attach commit_tree: take a pointer/len pair rather than a const strbuf
2014-07-10use strbuf_addch for adding single charactersRené Scharfe1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-09Merge branch 'jk/xstrfmt'Junio C Hamano1-23/+30
* jk/xstrfmt: setup_git_env(): introduce git_path_from_env() helper unique_path: fix unlikely heap overflow walker_fetch: fix minor memory leak merge: use argv_array when spawning merge strategy sequencer: use argv_array_pushf setup_git_env: use git_pathdup instead of xmalloc + sprintf use xstrfmt to replace xmalloc + strcpy/strcat use xstrfmt to replace xmalloc + sprintf use xstrdup instead of xmalloc + strcpy use xstrfmt in favor of manual size calculations strbuf: add xstrfmt helper
2014-07-09Merge branch 'jk/skip-prefix'Junio C Hamano1-7/+8
* jk/skip-prefix: http-push: refactor parsing of remote object names imap-send: use skip_prefix instead of using magic numbers use skip_prefix to avoid repeated calculations git: avoid magic number with skip_prefix fetch-pack: refactor parsing in get_ack fast-import: refactor parsing of spaces stat_opt: check extra strlen call daemon: use skip_prefix to avoid magic numbers fast-import: use skip_prefix for parsing input use skip_prefix to avoid repeating strings use skip_prefix to avoid magic numbers transport-helper: avoid reading past end-of-string fast-import: fix read of uninitialized argv memory apply: use skip_prefix instead of raw addition refactor skip_prefix to return a boolean avoid using skip_prefix as a boolean daemon: mark some strings as const parse_diff_color_slot: drop ofs parameter
2014-07-02Merge branch 'jk/commit-buffer-length'Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
Move "commit->buffer" out of the in-core commit object and keep track of their lengths. Use this to optimize the code paths to validate GPG signatures in commit objects. * jk/commit-buffer-length: reuse cached commit buffer when parsing signatures commit: record buffer length in cache commit: convert commit->buffer to a slab commit-slab: provide a static initializer use get_commit_buffer everywhere convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_buffer use get_commit_buffer to avoid duplicate code use get_cached_commit_buffer where appropriate provide helpers to access the commit buffer provide a helper to set the commit buffer provide a helper to free commit buffer sequencer: use logmsg_reencode in get_message logmsg_reencode: return const buffer do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc commit: push commit_index update into alloc_commit_node alloc: include any-object allocations in alloc_report replace dangerous uses of strbuf_attach commit_tree: take a pointer/len pair rather than a const strbuf
2014-06-20use skip_prefix to avoid repeating stringsJeff King1-7/+8
It's a common idiom to match a prefix and then skip past it with strlen, like: if (starts_with(foo, "bar")) foo += strlen("bar"); This avoids magic numbers, but means we have to repeat the string (and there is no compiler check that we didn't make a typo in one of the strings). We can use skip_prefix to handle this case without repeating ourselves. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-19unique_path: fix unlikely heap overflowJeff King1-15/+26
When merge-recursive creates a unique filename, it uses a template like: path~branch_%d where the final "_%d" is filled by an incrementing counter until we find a unique name. We allocate 8 characters for the counter, but there is no logic to limit the size of the integer. Of course, this is extremely unlikely, as you would need a hundred million collisions to trigger the problem. Even if an attacker constructed a specialized repo, it is unlikely that the victim would have the patience to run the merge. However, we can make it trivially correct (and hopefully more readable) by using a strbuf. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-19use xstrfmt to replace xmalloc + sprintfJeff King1-8/+4
This is one line shorter, and makes sure the length in the malloc and sprintf steps match. These conversions are very straightforward; we can drop the malloc entirely, and replace the sprintf with xstrfmt. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13commit: record buffer length in cacheJeff King1-1/+1
Most callsites which use the commit buffer try to use the cached version attached to the commit, rather than re-reading from disk. Unfortunately, that interface provides only a pointer to the NUL-terminated buffer, with no indication of the original length. For the most part, this doesn't matter. People do not put NULs in their commit messages, and the log code is happy to treat it all as a NUL-terminated string. However, some code paths do care. For example, when checking signatures, we want to be very careful that we verify all the bytes to avoid malicious trickery. This patch just adds an optional "size" out-pointer to get_commit_buffer and friends. The existing callers all pass NULL (there did not seem to be any obvious sites where we could avoid an immediate strlen() call, though perhaps with some further refactoring we could). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13use get_commit_buffer everywhereJeff King1-1/+3
Each of these sites assumes that commit->buffer is valid. Since they would segfault if this was not the case, they are likely to be correct in practice. However, we can future-proof them by using get_commit_buffer. And as a side effect, we abstract away the final bare uses of commit->buffer. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on cache tree updateNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-3/+1
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-13read-cache: new API write_locked_index instead of write_index/write_cacheNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-4/+3
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-12do not create "struct commit" with xcallocJeff King1-1/+1
In both blame and merge-recursive, we sometimes create a "fake" commit struct for convenience (e.g., to represent the HEAD state as if we would commit it). By allocating ourselves rather than using alloc_commit_node, we do not properly set the "index" field of the commit. This can produce subtle bugs if we then use commit-slab on the resulting commit, as we will share the "0" index with another commit. We can fix this by using alloc_commit_node() to allocate. Note that we cannot free the result, as it is part of our commit allocator. However, both cases were already leaking the allocated commit anyway, so there's nothing to fix up. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-07merge-recursive.c: fix case-changing merge bugDavid Turner1-0/+6
On a case-insensitive filesystem, when merging, a file would be wrongly deleted from the working tree if an incoming commit had renamed it changing only its case. When merging a rename, the file with the old name would be deleted -- but since the filesystem considers the old name to be the same as the new name, the new file would in fact be deleted. We avoid this by not deleting files that have a case-clone in the index at stage 0. Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twitter.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-18Merge branch 'bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive' into maintJunio C Hamano1-1/+3
"merge-recursive" was broken in 1.7.7 era and stopped working in an empty (temporary) working tree, when there are renames involved. This has been corrected. * bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive: merge-recursive.c: tolerate missing files while refreshing index read-cache.c: extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with options read-cache.c: refactor --ignore-missing implementation t3030-merge-recursive: test known breakage with empty work tree
2014-02-27Merge branch 'bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive'Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
Allow "merge-recursive" to work in an empty (temporary) working tree again when there are renames involved, correcting an old regression in 1.7.7 era. * bk/refresh-missing-ok-in-merge-recursive: merge-recursive.c: tolerate missing files while refreshing index read-cache.c: extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with options read-cache.c: refactor --ignore-missing implementation t3030-merge-recursive: test known breakage with empty work tree
2014-02-24merge-recursive.c: tolerate missing files while refreshing indexBrad King1-1/+2
Teach add_cacheinfo to tell make_cache_entry to skip refreshing stat information when a file is missing from the work tree. We do not want the index to be stat-dirty after the merge but also do not want to fail when a file happens to be missing. This fixes the 'merge-recursive w/ empty work tree - ours has rename' case in t3030-merge-recursive. Suggested-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-24read-cache.c: extend make_cache_entry refresh flag with optionsBrad King1-1/+2
Convert the make_cache_entry boolean 'refresh' argument to a more general 'refresh_options' argument. Pass the value through to the underlying refresh_cache_ent call. Add option CE_MATCH_REFRESH to enable stat refresh. Update call sites to use the new signature. Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-27Merge branch 'mh/safe-create-leading-directories'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code clean-up and protection against concurrent write access to the ref namespace. * mh/safe-create-leading-directories: rename_tmp_log(): on SCLD_VANISHED, retry rename_tmp_log(): limit the number of remote_empty_directories() attempts rename_tmp_log(): handle a possible mkdir/rmdir race rename_ref(): extract function rename_tmp_log() remove_dir_recurse(): handle disappearing files and directories remove_dir_recurse(): tighten condition for removing unreadable dir lock_ref_sha1_basic(): if locking fails with ENOENT, retry lock_ref_sha1_basic(): on SCLD_VANISHED, retry safe_create_leading_directories(): add new error value SCLD_VANISHED cmd_init_db(): when creating directories, handle errors conservatively safe_create_leading_directories(): introduce enum for return values safe_create_leading_directories(): always restore slash at end of loop safe_create_leading_directories(): split on first of multiple slashes safe_create_leading_directories(): rename local variable safe_create_leading_directories(): add explicit "slash" pointer safe_create_leading_directories(): reduce scope of local variable safe_create_leading_directories(): fix format of "if" chaining
2014-01-06safe_create_leading_directories(): introduce enum for return valuesMichael Haggerty1-1/+1
Instead of returning magic integer values (which a couple of callers go to the trouble of distinguishing), return values from an enum. Add a docstring. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-05replace {pre,suf}fixcmp() with {starts,ends}_with()Christian Couder1-3/+3
Leaving only the function definitions and declarations so that any new topic in flight can still make use of the old functions, replace existing uses of the prefixcmp() and suffixcmp() with new API functions. The change can be recreated by mechanically applying this: $ git grep -l -e prefixcmp -e suffixcmp -- \*.c | grep -v strbuf\\.c | xargs perl -pi -e ' s|!prefixcmp\(|starts_with\(|g; s|prefixcmp\(|!starts_with\(|g; s|!suffixcmp\(|ends_with\(|g; s|suffixcmp\(|!ends_with\(|g; ' on the result of preparatory changes in this series. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-28Merge branch 'jk/diff-algo' into maintJunio C Hamano1-2/+2
"git merge-recursive" did not parse its "--diff-algorithm=" command line option correctly. * jk/diff-algo: merge-recursive: fix parsing of "diff-algorithm" option
2013-10-14Merge branch 'jk/diff-algo'Jonathan Nieder1-2/+2
* jk/diff-algo: merge-recursive: fix parsing of "diff-algorithm" option
2013-09-26merge-recursive: fix parsing of "diff-algorithm" optionJohn Keeping1-2/+2
The "diff-algorithm" option to the recursive merge strategy takes the name of the algorithm as an option, but it uses strcmp on the option string to check if it starts with "diff-algorithm=", meaning that this options cannot actually be used. Fix this by switching to prefixcmp. At the same time, clarify the following line by using strlen instead of a hard-coded length, which also makes it consistent with nearby code. Reported-by: Luke Noel-Storr <luke.noel-storr@integrate.co.uk> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-09-09Merge branch 'jl/submodule-mv'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git mv A B" when moving a submodule A does "the right thing", inclusing relocating its working tree and adjusting the paths in the .gitmodules file. * jl/submodule-mv: (53 commits) rm: delete .gitmodules entry of submodules removed from the work tree mv: update the path entry in .gitmodules for moved submodules submodule.c: add .gitmodules staging helper functions mv: move submodules using a gitfile mv: move submodules together with their work trees rm: do not set a variable twice without intermediate reading. t6131 - skip tests if on case-insensitive file system parse_pathspec: accept :(icase)path syntax pathspec: support :(glob) syntax pathspec: make --literal-pathspecs disable pathspec magic pathspec: support :(literal) syntax for noglob pathspec kill limit_pathspec_to_literal() as it's only used by parse_pathspec() parse_pathspec: preserve prefix length via PATHSPEC_PREFIX_ORIGIN parse_pathspec: make sure the prefix part is wildcard-free rename field "raw" to "_raw" in struct pathspec tree-diff: remove the use of pathspec's raw[] in follow-rename codepath remove match_pathspec() in favor of match_pathspec_depth() remove init_pathspec() in favor of parse_pathspec() remove diff_tree_{setup,release}_paths convert common_prefix() to use struct pathspec ...
2013-07-15remove init_pathspec() in favor of parse_pathspec()Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+1
While at there, move free_pathspec() to pathspec.c Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-09Convert "struct cache_entry *" to "const ..." wherever possibleNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-3/+4
I attempted to make index_state->cache[] a "const struct cache_entry **" to find out how existing entries in index are modified and where. The question I have is what do we do if we really need to keep track of on-disk changes in the index. The result is - diff-lib.c: setting CE_UPTODATE - name-hash.c: setting CE_HASHED - preload-index.c, read-cache.c, unpack-trees.c and builtin/update-index: obvious - entry.c: write_entry() may refresh the checked out entry via fill_stat_cache_info(). This causes "non-const struct cache_entry *" in builtin/apply.c, builtin/checkout-index.c and builtin/checkout.c - builtin/ls-files.c: --with-tree changes stagemask and may set CE_UPDATE Of these, write_entry() and its call sites are probably most interesting because it modifies on-disk info. But this is stat info and can be retrieved via refresh, at least for porcelain commands. Other just uses ce_flags for local purposes. So, keeping track of "dirty" entries is just a matter of setting a flag in index modification functions exposed by read-cache.c. Except unpack-trees, the rest of the code base does not do anything funny behind read-cache's back. The actual patch is less valueable than the summary above. But if anyone wants to re-identify the above sites. Applying this patch, then this: diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h index 430d021..1692891 100644 --- a/cache.h +++ b/cache.h @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static inline unsigned int canon_mode(unsigned int mode) #define cache_entry_size(len) (offsetof(struct cache_entry,name) + (len) + 1) struct index_state { - struct cache_entry **cache; + const struct cache_entry **cache; unsigned int version; unsigned int cache_nr, cache_alloc, cache_changed; struct string_list *resolve_undo; will help quickly identify them without bogus warnings. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-16diff: Introduce --diff-algorithm command line optionMichal Privoznik1-0/+9
Since command line options have higher priority than config file variables and taking previous commit into account, we need a way how to specify myers algorithm on command line. However, inventing `--myers` is not the right answer. We need far more general option, and that is `--diff-algorithm`. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-09Which merge_file() function do you mean?Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
There are two different static functions and one global function, all of them called "merge_file()", with different signatures and purposes. Rename them all to reduce confusion in "git grep" output: * Rename the static one in merge-index to "merge_one_path(const char *path)" as that function is about asking an external command to resolve conflicts in one path. * Rename the global one in merge-file.c that is only used by merge-tree to "merge_blobs()", as the function takes three blobs and returns the merged result only in-core, without doing anything to the filesystem. * Rename the one in merge-recursive to "merge_one_file()", just to be fair. Also rename merge-file.[ch] to merge-blobs.[ch]. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-14Merge branch 'rj/path-cleanup'Junio C Hamano1-6/+7
* rj/path-cleanup: Call mkpathdup() rather than xstrdup(mkpath(...)) Call git_pathdup() rather than xstrdup(git_path("...")) path.c: Use vsnpath() in the implementation of git_path() path.c: Don't discard the return value of vsnpath() path.c: Remove the 'git_' prefix from a file scope function
2012-09-04Call mkpathdup() rather than xstrdup(mkpath(...))Ramsay Jones1-6/+7
In addition to updating the xstrdup(mkpath(...)) call sites with mkpathdup(), we also fix a memory leak (in merge_3way()) caused by neglecting to free the memory allocated to the 'base_name' variable. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-22Merge branch 'tr/void-diff-setup-done'Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
Remove unnecessary code. * tr/void-diff-setup-done: diff_setup_done(): return void
2012-08-22Merge branch 'tr/merge-recursive-flush'Junio C Hamano1-18/+1
Remove unnecessary code. * tr/merge-recursive-flush: merge-recursive: eliminate flush_buffer() in favor of write_in_full()
2012-08-05merge-recursive: separate message for common ancestorsRalf Thielow1-1/+4
The function "merge_recursive" prints the count of common ancestors as "found %u common ancestor(s):". We should use a singular and a plural form of this message to help translators. Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-03merge-recursive: eliminate flush_buffer() in favor of write_in_full()Thomas Rast1-18/+1
flush_buffer() is a thin wrapper around write_in_full() with two very confusing properties: * It runs a loop to handle short reads, ensuring that we write everything. But that is precisely what write_in_full() does! * It checks for a return value of 0 from write_in_full(), which cannot happen: it returns this value only if count=0, but flush_buffer() will never call write_in_full() in this case. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-03diff_setup_done(): return voidThomas Rast1-2/+1
diff_setup_done() has historically returned an error code, but lost the last nonzero return in 943d5b7 (allow diff.renamelimit to be set regardless of -M/-C, 2006-08-09). The callers were in a pretty confused state: some actually checked for the return code, and some did not. Let it return void, and patch all callers to take this into account. This conveniently also gets rid of a handful of different(!) error messages that could never be triggered anyway. Note that the function can still die(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-26i18n: merge-recursive: mark strings for translationJiang Xin1-69/+79
Mark strings in merge-recursive for translation. Some tests would start to fail with GETTEXT_POISON turned on after this update. Use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep where appropriate to mark strings that should only be checked in the C locale output to avoid such issues. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-16Merge branch 'jk/diff-no-rename-empty'Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
Forbids rename detection logic from matching two empty files as renames during merge-recursive to prevent mismerges. By Jeff King * jk/diff-no-rename-empty: merge-recursive: don't detect renames of empty files teach diffcore-rename to optionally ignore empty content make is_empty_blob_sha1 available everywhere drop casts from users EMPTY_TREE_SHA1_BIN
2012-04-15Merge branch 'jc/diff-algo-cleanup'Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Resurrects the preparatory clean-up patches from another topic that was discarded, as this would give a saner foundation to build on diff.algo configuration option series. * jc/diff-algo-cleanup: xdiff: PATIENCE/HISTOGRAM are not independent option bits xdiff: remove XDL_PATCH_* macros
2012-03-23merge-recursive: don't detect renames of empty filesJeff King1-0/+1
Merge-recursive detects renames so that if one side modifies "foo" and the other side moves it to "bar", the modification is applied to "bar". However, our rename detection is based on content analysis, it can be wrong (i.e., two files were not intended as a rename, but just happen to have the same or similar content). This is quite rare if the files actually contain content, since two unrelated files are unlikely to have exactly the same content. However, empty files present a problem, in that there is nothing to analyze. An uninteresting placeholder file with zero bytes may or may not be related to a placeholder file with another name. The result is that adding content to an empty file may cause confusion if the other side of a merge removed it; your content may end up in another random placeholder file that was added. Let's err on the side of caution and not consider empty files as renames. This will cause a modify/delete conflict on the merge, which will let the user sort it out themselves. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-23drop casts from users EMPTY_TREE_SHA1_BINJeff King1-1/+1
This macro already evaluates to the correct type, as it casts the string literal to "unsigned char *" itself (and callers who want the literal can use the _LITERAL form). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-19xdiff: PATIENCE/HISTOGRAM are not independent option bitsJunio C Hamano1-2/+2
Because the default Myers, patience and histogram algorithms cannot be in effect at the same time, XDL_PATIENCE_DIFF and XDL_HISTOGRAM_DIFF are not independent bits. Instead of wasting one bit per algorithm, define a few macros to access the few bits they occupy and update the code that access them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-07cache-tree: update API to take abitrary flagsNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-19Merge branch 'tr/cache-tree'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* tr/cache-tree: reset: update cache-tree data when appropriate commit: write cache-tree data when writing index anyway Refactor cache_tree_update idiom from commit Test the current state of the cache-tree optimization Add test-scrap-cache-tree
2011-12-06Refactor cache_tree_update idiom from commitThomas Rast1-1/+1
We'll need to safely create or update the cache-tree data of the_index from other places. While at it, give it an argument that lets us silence the messages produced by unmerged entries (which prevent it from working). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-08merge: make usage of commit->util more extensibleJunio C Hamano1-7/+6
The merge-recursive code uses the commit->util field directly to annotate the commit objects given from the command line, i.e. the remote heads to be merged, with a single string to be used to describe it in its trace messages and conflict markers. Correct this short-signtedness by redefining the field to be a pointer to a structure "struct merge_remote_desc" that later enhancements can add more information. Store the original objects we were told to merge in a field "obj" in this struct, so that we can recover the tag we were told to merge. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-13submodule: Search for merges only at end of recursive mergeBrad King1-2/+4
The submodule merge search is not useful during virtual merges because the results cannot be used automatically. Furthermore any suggestions made by the search may apply to commits different than HEAD:sub and MERGE_HEAD:sub, thus confusing the user. Skip searching for submodule merges during a virtual merge such as that between B and C while merging the heads of: B---BC / \ / A X \ / \ C---CB Run the search only when the recursion level is zero (!o->call_depth). This fixes known breakage tested in t7405-submodule-merge. Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-05Merge branch 'cn/eradicate-working-copy'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* cn/eradicate-working-copy: Remove 'working copy' from the documentation and C code
2011-09-23merge-recursive: Do not look at working tree during a virtual ancestor mergeJunio C Hamano1-1/+1
Fix another instance of a recursive merge incorrectly paying attention to the working tree file during a virtual ancestor merge, that resulted in spurious and useless "addinfo_cache failed" error message. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-21Remove 'working copy' from the documentation and C codeCarlos Martín Nieto1-1/+1
The git term is 'working tree', so replace the most public references to 'working copy'. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-02Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive-2'Junio C Hamano1-384/+695
* en/merge-recursive-2: (57 commits) merge-recursive: Don't re-sort a list whose order we depend upon merge-recursive: Fix virtual merge base for rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest + simple modify merge-recursive: Avoid unnecessary file rewrites t6022: Additional tests checking for unnecessary updates of files merge-recursive: Fix spurious 'refusing to lose untracked file...' messages t6022: Add testcase for spurious "refusing to lose untracked" messages t3030: fix accidental success in symlink rename merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2 merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case ...
2011-08-25Merge branch 'jn/plug-empty-tree-leak'Junio C Hamano1-5/+3
* jn/plug-empty-tree-leak: merge-recursive: take advantage of hardcoded empty tree revert: plug memory leak in "cherry-pick root commit" codepath
2011-08-16merge-recursive: take advantage of hardcoded empty treeJonathan Nieder1-5/+3
When this code was first written (v1.4.3-rc1~174^2~4, merge-recur: if there is no common ancestor, fake empty one, 2006-08-09), everyone needing a fake empty tree had to make her own, but ever since v1.5.5-rc0~180^2~1 (2008-02-13), the object lookup machinery provides a ready-made one. Use it. This is just a simplification, though it also fixes a small leak (since the tree in the virtual common ancestor commit is never freed). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Don't re-sort a list whose order we depend uponElijah Newren1-4/+12
In record_df_conflict_files() we would resort the entries list using df_name_compare to get a convenient ordering. Unfortunately, this broke assumptions of the get_renames() code (via string_list_lookup() calls) which needed the list to be in the standard ordering. When those lookups would fail, duplicate stage_data entries could be inserted, causing the process_renames and process_entry code to fail (in particular, a path that that process_renames had marked as processed would still be processed anyway in process_entry due to the duplicate entry). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix virtual merge base for rename/rename(1to2)/add-destElijah Newren1-2/+21
Earlier in this series, the patch "merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest" added code to handle the rename on each side of history also being involved in a rename/add conflict, but only did so in the non-recursive case. Add code for the recursive case, ensuring that the "added" files are not simply deleted. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Avoid unnecessary file rewritesElijah Newren1-6/+24
Often times, a potential conflict at a path is resolved by merge-recursive by using the content that was already present at that location. In such cases, we do not want to overwrite the content that is already present, as that could trigger unnecessary recompilations. One of the patches earlier in this series ("merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it") fixed the cases that involved content merges, but there were a few other cases as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix spurious 'refusing to lose untracked file...' messagesElijah Newren1-14/+20
Calling update_stages() before update_file() can sometimes result in git thinking the file being updated is untracked (whenever update_stages moves it to stage 3). Reverse the call order, and add a big comment to update_stages to hopefully prevent others from making the same mistake. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/addElijah Newren1-25/+48
If either side of a rename/rename(1to2) conflict is itself also involved in a rename/add-dest conflict, then we need to make sure both the rename and the added file appear in the working copy. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-destElijah Newren1-2/+19
Each side of the rename in rename/rename(1to2) could potentially also be involved in a rename/add conflict. Ensure stages for such conflicts are also recorded. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete codeElijah Newren1-16/+30
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusableElijah Newren1-34/+48
modify/delete and rename/delete share a lot of similarities; we'd like all the criss-cross and D/F conflict handling specializations to be shared between the two. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflictsElijah Newren1-9/+21
Our previous conflict resolution for renaming two different files to the same name ignored the fact that each of those files may have modifications from both sides of history to consider. We need to do a three-way merge for each of those files, and then handle the conflict of both sets of merged contents trying to be recorded with the same name. It is important to note that this changes our strategy in the recursive case. After doing a three-way content merge of each of the files involved, we still are faced with the fact that we are trying to put both of the results (including conflict markers) into the same path. We could do another two-way merge, but I think that becomes confusing. Also, taking a hint from the modify/delete and rename/delete cases we handled earlier, a more useful "common ground" would be to keep the three-way content merge but record it with the original filename. The renames can still be detected, we just allow it to be done in the o->call_depth=0 case. This seems to result in simpler & easier to understand merge conflicts as well, as evidenced by some of the changes needed in our testsuite in t6036. (However, it should be noted that this change will cause problems those renames also occur along with a file being added whose name matches the source of the rename. Since git currently cannot detect rename/add-source situations, though, this codepath is not currently used for those cases anyway. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markersElijah Newren1-9/+33
We want to be able to reuse the code to do a three-way file content merge and have the conflict markers use both branchname and filename. Split it out into a separate function. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renamesElijah Newren1-3/+39
When two different files are renamed to one, we need to be able to do three-way merges for both of those files. To do that, we need to record the sha1sum of the (possibly modified) file on the unrenamed side. Modify setup_rename_conflict_info() to take this extra information and record it when the rename_type is RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entryElijah Newren1-42/+62
This puts the code for the different types of double rename conflicts closer together (fewer lines of other code separating the two paths) and increases similarity between how they are handled. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2Elijah Newren1-33/+27
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge baseElijah Newren1-17/+13
When renaming one file to two files, we really should be doing a content merge. Also, in the recursive case, undoing the renames and recording the merged file in the index with the source of the rename (while deleting both destinations) allows the renames to be re-detected in the non-recursive merge and will result in fewer spurious conflicts. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience functionElijah Newren1-35/+37
merge_file previously required diff_filespec arguments, but all callers only had sha1s and modes. Rename merge_file to merge_file_1 and introduce a new merge_file convenience function which takes the sha1s and modes and creates the temporary diff_filespec variables needed to call merge_file_1. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive caseElijah Newren1-14/+24
When o->call_depth>0 and we have conflicts, we try to find "middle ground" when creating the virtual merge base. In the case of content conflicts, this can be done by doing a three-way content merge and using the result. In all parts where the three-way content merge is clean, it is the correct middle ground, and in parts where it conflicts there is no middle ground but the conflict markers provide a good compromise since they are unlikely to accidentally match any further changes. In the case of a modify/delete conflict, we cannot do the same thing. Accepting either endpoint as the resolution for the virtual merge base runs the risk that when handling the non-recursive case we will silently accept one person's resolution over another without flagging a conflict. In this case, the closest "middle ground" we have is actually the merge base of the candidate merge bases. (We could alternatively attempt a three way content merge using an empty file in place of the deleted file, but that seems to be more work than necessary.) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip itElijah Newren1-3/+16
In 882fd11 (merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames 2010-09-20), there was code that checked for whether we could skip updating a file in the working directory, based on whether the merged version matched the current working copy. Due to the desire to handle directory/file conflicts that were resolvable, that commit deferred content merging by first updating the index with the unmerged entries and then moving the actual merging (along with the skip-the-content-update check) to another function that ran later in the merge process. As part moving the content merging code, a bug was introduced such that although the message about skipping the update would be printed (whenever GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY was sufficiently high), the file would be unconditionally updated in the working copy anyway. When we detect that the file does not need to be updated in the working copy, update the index appropriately and then return early before updating the working copy. Note that there was a similar change in b2c8c0a (merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it 2011-02-28), but it was reverted by 6db4105 (Revert "Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive'" 2011-05-19) since it did not fix both of the relevant types of unnecessary update breakages and, worse, it made use of some band-aids that caused other problems. The reason this change works is due to the changes earlier in this series to (a) record_df_conflict_files instead of just unlinking them early, (b) allowing make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries, (c) the splitting of update_stages_and_entry() to have its functionality called at different points, and (d) making the pathnames of the files involved in the merge available to merge_content(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renamesElijah Newren1-3/+25
Whenever there are merge conflicts in file contents, we would mark the different sides of the conflict with the two branches being merged. However, when there is a rename involved as well, the branchname is not sufficient to specify where the conflicting content came from. In such cases, mark the two sides of the conflict with branchname:filename rather than just branchname. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Cleanup and consolidation of rename_conflict_infoElijah Newren1-68/+66
The consolidation of process_entry() and process_df_entry() allows us to consolidate more code paths concerning rename conflicts, and to do a few additional related cleanups. It also means we are using rename_df_conflict_info in some cases where there is no D/F conflict; rename it to rename_conflict_info. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Consolidate process_entry() and process_df_entry()Elijah Newren1-131/+57
The whole point of adding process_df_entry() was to ensure that files of D/F conflicts were processed after paths under the corresponding directory. However, given that the entries are in sorted order, all we need to do is iterate through them in reverse order to achieve the same effect. That lets us remove some duplicated code, and lets us keep track of one less thing as we read the code ("do we need to make sure this is processed before process_df_entry() or do we need to defer it until then?"). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Improve handling of rename target vs. directory additionElijah Newren1-5/+22
When dealing with file merging and renames and D/F conflicts and possible criss-cross merges (how's that for a corner case?), we did not do a thorough job ensuring the index and working directory had the correct contents. Fix the logic in merge_content() to handle this. Also, correct some erroneous tests in t6022 that were expecting the wrong number of unmerged index entries. These changes fix one of the tests in t6042 (and almost fix another one from t6042 as well). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Add comments about handling rename/add-source casesElijah Newren1-0/+11
There are a couple of places where changes are needed to for situations involving rename/add-source issues. Add comments about the needed changes (and existing bugs) until git has been enabled to detect such cases. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Make dead code for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts undeadElijah Newren1-22/+48
The code for rename_rename_2to1 conflicts (two files both being renamed to the same filename) was dead since the rename/add path was always being independently triggered for each of the renames instead. Further, reviving the dead code showed that it was inherently buggy and would always segfault -- among a few other bugs. Move the else-if branch for the rename/rename block before the rename/add block to make sure it is checked first, and fix up the rename/rename(2to1) code segments to make it handle most cases. Work is still needed to handle higher dimensional corner cases such as rename/rename/modify/modify issues. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix deletion of untracked file in rename/delete conflictsElijah Newren1-1/+2
In the recursive case (o->call_depth > 0), we do not modify the working directory. However, when o->call_depth==0, file renames can mean we need to delete the old filename from the working copy. Since there have been lots of changes and mistakes here, let's go through the details. Let's start with a simple explanation of what we are trying to achieve: Original goal: If a file is renamed on the side of history being merged into head, the filename serving as the source of that rename needs to be removed from the working directory. The path to getting the above statement implemented in merge-recursive took several steps. The relevant bits of code may be instructive to keep in mind for the explanation, especially since an English-only description involves double negatives that are hard to follow. These bits of code are: int remove_file(..., const char *path, int no_wd) { ... int update_working_directory = !o->call_depth && !no_wd; and remove_file(o, 1, ren1_src, <expression>); Where the choice for <expression> has morphed over time: 65ac6e9 (merge-recursive: adjust to loosened "working file clobbered" check 2006-10-27), introduced the "no_wd" parameter to remove_file() and used "1" for <expression>. This meant ren1_src was never deleted, leaving it around in the working copy. In 8371234 (Remove uncontested renamed files during merge. 2006-12-13), <expression> was changed to "index_only" (where index_only == !!o->call_depth; see b7fa51da). This was equivalent to using "0" for <expression> (due to the early logic in remove_file), and is orthogonal to the condition we actually want to check at this point; it resulted in the source file being removed except when index_only was false. This was problematic because the file could have been renamed on the side of history including head, in which case ren1_src could correspond to an untracked file that should not be deleted. In 183d797 (Keep untracked files not involved in a merge. 2007-02-04), <expression> was changed to "index_only || stage == 3". While this gives correct behavior, the "index_only ||" portion of <expression> is unnecessary and makes the code slightly harder to follow. There were also two further changes to this expression, though without any change in behavior. First in b7fa51d (merge-recursive: get rid of the index_only global variable 2008-09-02), it was changed to "o->call_depth || stage == 3". (index_only == !!o->call_depth). Later, in 41d70bd6 (merge-recursive: Small code clarification -- variable name and comments), this was changed to "o->call_depth || renamed_stage == 2" (where stage was renamed to other_stage and renamed_stage == other_stage ^ 1). So we ended with <expression> being "o->call_depth || renamed_stage == 2". But the "o->call_depth ||" piece was unnecessary. We can remove it, leaving us with <expression> being "renamed_stage == 2". This doesn't change behavior at all, but it makes the code clearer. Which is good, because it's about to get uglier. Corrected goal: If a file is renamed on the side of history being merged into head, the filename serving as the source of that rename needs to be removed from the working directory *IF* that file is tracked in head AND the file tracked in head is related to the original file. Note that the only difference between the original goal and the corrected goal is the two extra conditions added at the end. The first condition is relevant in a rename/delete conflict. If the file was deleted on the HEAD side of the merge and an untracked file of the same name was added to the working copy, then without that extra condition the untracked file will be erroneously deleted. This changes <expression> to "renamed_stage == 2 || !was_tracked(ren1_src)". The second additional condition is relevant in two cases. The first case the second condition can occur is when a file is deleted and a completely different file is added with the same name. To my knowledge, merge-recursive has no mechanism for detecting deleted-and- replaced-by-different-file cases, so I am simply punting on this possibility. The second case for the second condition to occur is when there is a rename/rename/add-source conflict. That is, when the original file was renamed on both sides of history AND the original filename is being re-used by some unrelated (but tracked) content. This case also presents some additional difficulties for us since we cannot currently detect these rename/rename/add-source conflicts; as long as the rename detection logic "optimizes" by ignoring filenames that are present at both ends of the diff, these conflicts will go unnoticed. However, rename/rename conflicts are handled by an entirely separate codepath not being discussed here, so this case is not relevant for the line of code under consideration. In summary: Change <expression> from "o->call_depth || renamed_stage == 2" to "renamed_stage == 2 || !was_tracked(ren1_src)", in order to remove unnecessary code and avoid deleting untracked files. 96 lines of explanation in the changelog to describe a one-line fix... Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Split update_stages_and_entry; only update stages at endElijah Newren1-18/+17
Instead of having the process_renames logic update the stages in the index for the rename destination, have the index updated after process_entry or process_df_entry. This will also allow us to have process_entry determine whether a file was tracked and existed in the working copy before the merge started. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Allow make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entriesElijah Newren1-4/+22
If there were several files conflicting below a directory corresponding to a D/F conflict, and the file of that D/F conflict is in the way, we want it to be removed. Since files of D/F conflicts are handled last, they can be reinstated later and possibly with a new unique name. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Split was_tracked() out of would_lose_untracked()Elijah Newren1-3/+8
Checking whether a filename was part of stage 0 or stage 2 is code that we would like to be able to call from a few other places without also lstat()-ing the file to see if it exists in the working copy. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Save D/F conflict filenames instead of unlinking themElijah Newren1-16/+24
Rename make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts() to record_df_conflict_files() to reflect the change in functionality. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix code checking for D/F conflicts still being presentElijah Newren1-15/+34
Previously, we were using lstat() to determine if a directory was still present after a merge (and thus in the way of adding a file). We should have been using lstat() only to determine if untracked directories were in the way (and then only when necessary to check for untracked directories); we should instead using the index to determine if there is a tracked directory in the way. Create a new function to do this and use it to replace the existing checks for directories being in the way. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix sorting order and directory change assumptionsElijah Newren1-5/+35
We cannot assume that directory/file conflicts will appear in sorted order; for example, 'letters.txt' comes between 'letters' and 'letters/file'. Thanks to Johannes for a pointer about qsort stability issues with Windows and suggested code change. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Fix recursive case with D/F conflict via add/add conflictElijah Newren1-0/+2
When a D/F conflict is introduced via an add/add conflict, when o->call_depth > 0 we need to ensure that the higher stage entry from the base stage is removed. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Avoid working directory changes during recursive caseElijah Newren1-0/+7
make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts() is about making sure necessary working directory changes can succeed. When o->call_depth > 0 (i.e. the recursive case), we do not want to make any working directory changes so this function should be skipped. Note that make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts() is broken as has been pointed out by Junio; it should NOT be unlinking files. What it should do is keep track of files that could be unlinked if a directory later needs to be written in their place. However, that work also is only relevant in the non-recursive case, so this change is helpful either way. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Remember to free generated unique path namesElijah Newren1-8/+12
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Consolidate different update_stages functionsElijah Newren1-18/+9
We are only calling update_stages_options() one way really, so we can consolidate the slightly different variants into one and remove some parameters whose values are always the same. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Mark some diff_filespec struct arguments constElijah Newren1-9/+10
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Correct a commentElijah Newren1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-14merge-recursive: Make BUG message more legible by adding a newlineElijah Newren1-1/+1
Hopefully no one ever hits this error except when making large changes to merge-recursive.c and debugging... Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-07-12teach --histogram to diffTay Ray Chuan1-0/+2
Port JGit's HistogramDiff algorithm over to C. Rough numbers (TODO) show that it is faster than its --patience cousin, as well as the default Meyers algorithm. The implementation has been reworked to use structs and pointers, instead of bitmasks, thus doing away with JGit's 2^28 line limit. We also use xdiff's default hash table implementation (xdl_hash_bits() with XDL_HASHLONG()) for convenience. Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-31Merge branch 'jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c' into maintJunio C Hamano1-7/+3
* jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c: diffcore-rename: fall back to -C when -C -C busts the rename limit diffcore-rename: record filepair for rename src diffcore-rename: refactor "too many candidates" logic builtin/diff.c: remove duplicated call to diff_result_code()
2011-05-19Revert "Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive'"Junio C Hamano1-18/+6
As the band-aid to merge-recursive seems to regress complex merges in an unpleasant way. The merge-recursive implementation needs to be rewritten in such a way that it resolves renames and D/F conflicts entirely in-core and not to touch working tree at all while doing so. But in the meantime, this reverts commit ac9666f84 that merged the topic in its entirety.
2011-05-14Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
* maint: add, merge, diff: do not use strcasecmp to compare config variable names
2011-05-14add, merge, diff: do not use strcasecmp to compare config variable namesJonathan Nieder1-3/+3
The config machinery already makes section and variable names lowercase when parsing them, so using strcasecmp for comparison just feels wasteful. No noticeable change intended. Noticed-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-06Merge branch 'nd/struct-pathspec'Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
* nd/struct-pathspec: pathspec: rename per-item field has_wildcard to use_wildcard Improve tree_entry_interesting() handling code Convert read_tree{,_recursive} to support struct pathspec Reimplement read_tree_recursive() using tree_entry_interesting()
2011-04-28Merge branch 'jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c'Junio C Hamano1-7/+3
* jc/rename-degrade-cc-to-c: diffcore-rename: fall back to -C when -C -C busts the rename limit diffcore-rename: record filepair for rename src diffcore-rename: refactor "too many candidates" logic builtin/diff.c: remove duplicated call to diff_result_code()
2011-04-28Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive'Junio C Hamano1-6/+18
* en/merge-recursive: merge-recursive: tweak magic band-aid merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it t6022: New test checking for unnecessary updates of files in D/F conflicts t6022: New test checking for unnecessary updates of renamed+modified files
2011-04-03Fix two unused variable warnings in gcc 4.6Dan McGee1-4/+0
Seen with -Wunused-but-set-variable. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-25Convert read_tree{,_recursive} to support struct pathspecNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+3
This patch changes behavior of the two functions. Previously it does prefix matching only. Now it can also do wildcard matching. All callers are updated. Some gain wildcard matching (archive, checkout), others reset pathspec_item.has_wildcard to retain old behavior (ls-files, ls-tree as they are plumbing). Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-22diffcore-rename: fall back to -C when -C -C busts the rename limitJunio C Hamano1-7/+3
When there are too many paths in the project, the number of rename source candidates "git diff -C -C" finds will exceed the rename detection limit, and no inexact rename detection is performed. We however could fall back to "git diff -C" if the number of modified paths is sufficiently small. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-19Merge branch 'jk/merge-rename-ux'Junio C Hamano1-2/+11
* jk/merge-rename-ux: pull: propagate --progress to merge merge: enable progress reporting for rename detection add inexact rename detection progress infrastructure commit: stop setting rename limit bump rename limit defaults (again) merge: improve inexact rename limit warning
2011-03-17merge-recursive: tweak magic band-aidJunio C Hamano1-1/+8
Running checks against working tree (e.g. lstat()) and causing changes to working tree (e.g. unlink()) while building a virtual ancestor merge does not make any sense. Avoid doing so. This is not a real fix; it is another magic band-aid on top of another band-aid we placed earlier. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-16Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano1-8/+4
* maint: Prepare draft release notes to 1.7.4.2 gitweb: highlight: replace tabs with spaces make_absolute_path: return the input path if it points to our buffer valgrind: ignore SSE-based strlen invalid reads diff --submodule: split into bite-sized pieces cherry: split off function to print output lines branch: split off function that writes tracking info and commit subject standardize brace placement in struct definitions compat: make gcc bswap an inline function enums: omit trailing comma for portability Conflicts: RelNotes
2011-03-16standardize brace placement in struct definitionsJonathan Nieder1-8/+4
In a struct definitions, unlike functions, the prevailing style is for the opening brace to go on the same line as the struct name, like so: struct foo { int bar; char *baz; }; Indeed, grepping for 'struct [a-z_]* {$' yields about 5 times as many matches as 'struct [a-z_]*$'. Linus sayeth: Heretic people all over the world have claimed that this inconsistency is ... well ... inconsistent, but all right-thinking people know that (a) K&R are _right_ and (b) K&R are right. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-02merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip itElijah Newren1-6/+11
In 882fd11 (merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames 2010-09-20), there was code that checked for whether we could skip updating a file in the working directory, based on whether the merged version matched the current working copy. Due to the desire to handle directory/file conflicts that were resolvable, that commit deferred content merging by first updating the index with the unmerged entries and then moving the actual merging (along with the skip-the-content-update check) to another function that ran later in the merge process. As part moving the content merging code, a bug was introduced such that although the message about skipping the update would be printed (whenever GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY was sufficiently high), the file would be unconditionally updated in the working copy anyway. When we detect that the file does not need to be updated in the working copy, update the index appropriately and then return early before updating the working copy. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-26strbuf: add strbuf_vaddfJeff King1-14/+1
In a variable-args function, the code for writing into a strbuf is non-trivial. We ended up cutting and pasting it in several places because there was no vprintf-style function for strbufs (which in turn was held up by a lack of va_copy). Now that we have a fallback va_copy, we can add strbuf_vaddf, the strbuf equivalent of vsprintf. And we can clean up the cut and paste mess. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Improved-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-21merge: enable progress reporting for rename detectionJeff King1-0/+1
The user can enable or disable it explicitly with the new --progress, but it defaults to checking isatty(2). This works only with merge-recursive and subtree. In theory we could pass a progress flag to other strategies, but none of them support progress at this point, so let's wait until they grow such a feature before worrying about propagating it. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-21bump rename limit defaults (again)Jeff King1-1/+1
We did this once before in 5070591 (bump rename limit defaults, 2008-04-30). Back then, we were shooting for about 1 second for a diff/log calculation, and 5 seconds for a merge. There are a few new things to consider, though: 1. Average processors are faster now. 2. We've seen on the mailing list some ugly merges where not using inexact rename detection leads to many more conflicts. Merges of this size take a long time anyway, so users are probably happy to spend a little bit of time computing the renames. Let's bump the diff/merge default limits from 200/500 to 400/1000. Those are 2 seconds and 10 seconds respectively on my modern hardware. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-21merge: improve inexact rename limit warningJeff King1-1/+9
The warning is generated deep in the diffcore code, which means that it will come first, followed possibly by a spew of conflicts, making it hard to see. Instead, let's have diffcore pass back the information about how big the rename limit would needed to have been, and then the caller can provide a more appropriate message (and at a more appropriate time). No refactoring of other non-merge callers is necessary, because nobody else was even using the warn_on_rename_limit feature. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-29Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive'Junio C Hamano1-223/+429
* en/merge-recursive: (41 commits) t6022: Use -eq not = to test output of wc -l merge-recursive:make_room_for_directories - work around dumb compilers merge-recursive: Remove redundant path clearing for D/F conflicts merge-recursive: Make room for directories in D/F conflicts handle_delete_modify(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present merge_content(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present conflict_rename_rename_1to2(): Fix checks for presence of D/F conflicts conflict_rename_delete(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present merge-recursive: Delay modify/delete conflicts if D/F conflict present merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames merge-recursive: Delay handling of rename/delete conflicts merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to other file merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to two merge-recursive: Avoid doubly merging rename/add conflict contents merge-recursive: Update merge_content() call signature merge-recursive: Update conflict_rename_rename_1to2() call signature merge-recursive: Structure process_df_entry() to handle more cases merge-recursive: Have process_entry() skip D/F or rename entries merge-recursive: New function to assist resolving renames in-core only merge-recursive: New data structures for deferring of D/F conflicts ... Conflicts: t/t6020-merge-df.sh t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
2010-10-26Merge branch 'kb/merge-recursive-rename-threshold'Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
* kb/merge-recursive-rename-threshold: diff: add synonyms for -M, -C, -B merge-recursive: option to specify rename threshold Conflicts: Documentation/diff-options.txt Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
2010-10-26Merge branch 'jf/merge-ignore-ws'Junio C Hamano1-11/+41
* jf/merge-ignore-ws: merge-recursive: options to ignore whitespace changes merge-recursive --patience ll-merge: replace flag argument with options struct merge-recursive: expose merge options for builtin merge
2010-10-21merge-recursive:make_room_for_directories - work around dumb compilersJunio C Hamano1-1/+1
Some vintage of gcc does not seem to notice last_len is only used when last_file is already set to non-NULL at which point last_len is also set. Noticed on FreeBSD 8 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Remove redundant path clearing for D/F conflictsElijah Newren1-15/+2
The code had several places where individual checks were done to remove files that could be in the way of directories in D/F conflicts. Not all D/F conflicts could have a path cleared for them in such a manner, however, leading to the need to create make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts() as done in the previous patch. That new function could not have been incorporated into the code sooner, since not all relevant code paths had been deferred to process_df_entry() yet, leading to the creation of even more of these now-redundant path removals. Clean out all of these extra D/F path clearing cases. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Make room for directories in D/F conflictsElijah Newren1-0/+58
When there are unmerged entries present, make sure to check for D/F conflicts first and remove any files present in HEAD that would be in the way of creating files below the correspondingly named directory. Such files will be processed again at the end of the merge in process_df_entry(); at that time we will be able to tell if we need to and can reinstate the file, whether we need to place its contents in a different file due to the directory still being present, etc. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29handle_delete_modify(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still presentElijah Newren1-9/+16
If all the paths below some directory involved in a D/F conflict were not removed during the rest of the merge, then the contents of the file whose path conflicted needs to be recorded in file with an alternative filename. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge_content(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still presentElijah Newren1-2/+20
If all the paths below some directory involved in a D/F conflict were not removed during the rest of the merge, then the contents of the file whose path conflicted needs to be recorded in file with an alternative filename. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29conflict_rename_rename_1to2(): Fix checks for presence of D/F conflictsElijah Newren1-4/+3
This function is called from process_df_entry(), near the end of the merge. Rather than just checking whether one of the sides of the merge had a directory at the same path as one of our files, check whether that directory is still present by this point of our merge. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29conflict_rename_delete(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still presentElijah Newren1-0/+8
If all the paths below some directory involved in a D/F conflict were not removed during the rest of the merge, then the contents of the file whose path conflicted needs to be recorded in file with an alternative filename. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Delay modify/delete conflicts if D/F conflict presentElijah Newren1-0/+9
When handling merges with modify/delete conflicts, if the modified path is involved in a D/F conflict, handle the issue in process_df_entry() rather than process_entry(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renamesElijah Newren1-36/+15
Move the handling of content merging for renames from process_renames() to process_df_entry(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Delay handling of rename/delete conflictsElijah Newren1-2/+20
Move the handling of rename/delete conflicts from process_renames() to process_df_entry(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to other fileElijah Newren1-26/+6
Move the handling of rename/rename conflicts where one file is renamed on both sides to the same file, from process_renames() to process_entry(). Here we avoid the three way merge logic by just using update_stages_and_entry() to move the higher stage entries in the index from the rename source to the rename destination, and then allow process_entry() to do its magic. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to twoElijah Newren1-16/+41
Move the handling of rename/rename conflicts where one file is renamed to two different files, from process_renames() to process_df_entry(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Avoid doubly merging rename/add conflict contentsElijah Newren1-0/+1
When a commit moves A to B while another commit created B (or moved C to B), and these two different commits serve as different merge-bases for a later merge, c94736a (merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling rename clashes 2009-07-30) added some special code to avoid segfaults. Since that commit, the two versions of B are merged in place (which could be potentially conflicting) and the intermediate result is used as the virtual ancestor. However, right before this special merge, try_merge was turned on, meaning that process_renames() would try an alternative merge that ignores the 'add' part of the conflict, and, if the merge is clean, store that as the new virtual ancestor. This could cause incorrect merging of criss-cross merges; it would typically result in just recording a slightly confusing merge base, but in some cases it could cause silent acceptance of one side of a merge as the final resolution when a conflict should have been flagged. When we do a special merge for such a rename/add conflict between merge-bases, turn try_merge off to avoid an inappropriate second merge. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Update merge_content() call signatureElijah Newren1-2/+4
Enable calling merge_content() and providing more information about renames and D/F conflicts (which we will want to do from process_df_entry()). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Update conflict_rename_rename_1to2() call signatureElijah Newren1-9/+9
To facilitate having this function called later using information stored in a rename_df_conflict_info struct, accept a diff_filepair instead of a rename. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Structure process_df_entry() to handle more casesElijah Newren1-36/+47
Modify process_df_entry() (mostly just indentation level changes) to get it ready for handling more D/F conflict type cases. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Have process_entry() skip D/F or rename entriesElijah Newren1-0/+3
If an entry has an associated rename_df_conflict_info, skip it and allow it to be processed by process_df_entry(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: New function to assist resolving renames in-core onlyElijah Newren1-3/+30
process_renames() and process_entry() have nearly identical code for doing three-way file merging to resolve content changes. Since we are already deferring some of the current rename handling in order to better handle D/F conflicts, it seems to make sense to defer content merging as well and remove the (nearly) duplicated code sections for handling this merging. To facilitate this process, add a new update_stages_and_entry() function which will map the higher stage index entries from two files involved in a rename into the resulting rename destination's index entries, and update the associated stage_data structure. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: New data structures for deferring of D/F conflictsElijah Newren1-0/+44
Since we need to resolve paths (including renames) in-core first and defer checking of D/F conflicts (namely waiting to see if directories are still in the way after all paths are resolved) before updating files involved in D/F conflicts, we will need to first process_renames, then record some information about the rename needed at D/F resolution time, and then make use of that information when resolving D/F conflicts at the end. This commit adds some relevant data structures for storing the necessary information. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Move process_entry's content merging into a functionElijah Newren1-28/+43
This move is in preparation for merge_content growing and being called from multiple places in order to handle D/F conflicts. I also snuck in a small change to the output in the case that the merged content for the file matches the current file contents, to make it better match (and thus more able to take over) how other merge_file() calls in process_renames() are handled. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Move delete/modify handling into dedicated functionElijah Newren1-13/+22
This move is in preparation for the function being called from multiple places in order to handle D/F conflicts. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Move rename/delete handling into dedicated functionElijah Newren1-11/+20
This move is in preparation for the function growing and being called from multiple places in order to handle D/F conflicts. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Nuke rename/directory conflict detectionElijah Newren1-18/+0
Since we want to resolve merges in-core and then detect at the end whether D/F conflicts remain in the way, we should just apply renames in-core and let logic elsewhere check for D/F conflicts. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Rename conflict_rename_rename*() for clarityElijah Newren1-12/+14
The names conflict_rename_rename and conflict_rename_rename_2 did not make it clear what they were handling. Since the first of these handles one file being renamed in both branches to different files, while the latter handles two different files being renamed to the same thing, add a little '1to2' and '2to1' suffix on these and an explanatory comment to make their intent clearer. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Small code clarification -- variable name and commentsElijah Newren1-6/+14
process_renames() had a variable named "stage" and derived variables src_other and dst_other whose purpose was not immediately obvious; also, I want to extend the scope of this variable and use it later, so it should have a more descriptive name. Do so, and add a brief comment explaining how it is used and what it relates to. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: Restructure showing how to chain more process_* functionsJunio C Hamano1-3/+8
In 3734893 (merge-recursive: Fix D/F conflicts 2010-07-09), process_df_entry() was added to process_renames() and process_entry() but in a somewhat restrictive manner. Modify the code slightly to make it clearer how we could chain more such functions if necessary, and alter process_df_entry() to handle such chaining. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29Merge branch 'en/rename-d-f' into en/merge-recursiveJunio C Hamano1-8/+8
* en/rename-d-f: merge-recursive: D/F conflicts where was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir t3509: Add rename + D/F conflict testcase that recursive strategy fails
2010-09-29merge-recursive: option to specify rename thresholdKevin Ballard1-0/+6
The recursive merge strategy turns on rename detection but leaves the rename threshold at the default. Add a strategy option to allow the user to specify a rename threshold to use. Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-15Merge branch 'ks/recursive-rename-add-identical'Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
* ks/recursive-rename-add-identical: RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical
2010-09-09merge-recursive: D/F conflicts where was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dirElijah Newren1-8/+8
In merge-recursive.c, whenever there was a rename where a file name on one side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge, then the very first check that string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst) would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict. However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work. This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files: COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE ) --------- --------------- ------- sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub) <NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>) then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead Adding newsub/newfile Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. After this patch, the error message will instead become: Removing newsub Adding newsub/newfile CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with git previously). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-03Merge branch 'dg/local-mod-error-messages'Junio C Hamano1-45/+1
* dg/local-mod-error-messages: t7609-merge-co-error-msgs: test non-fast forward case too. Move "show_all_errors = 1" to setup_unpack_trees_porcelain() setup_unpack_trees_porcelain: take the whole options struct as parameter Move set_porcelain_error_msgs to unpack-trees.c and rename it Conflicts: merge-recursive.c
2010-09-03RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identicalSchalk, Ken1-0/+6
>Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the >SYMLINKS prereq. Here's a third attempt with no use of symlinks in the test: Skip the entire rename/add conflict case if the file added on the other branch has the same contents as the file being renamed. This avoids giving the user an extra copy of the same file and presenting a conflict that is confusing and pointless. A simple test of this case has been added in t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh. Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-03Merge branch 'jn/merge-renormalize'Junio C Hamano1-3/+54
* jn/merge-renormalize: merge-recursive --renormalize rerere: never renormalize rerere: migrate to parse-options API t4200 (rerere): modernize style ll-merge: let caller decide whether to renormalize ll-merge: make flag easier to populate Documentation/technical: document ll_merge merge-trees: let caller decide whether to renormalize merge-trees: push choice to renormalize away from low level t6038 (merge.renormalize): check that it can be turned off t6038 (merge.renormalize): try checkout -m and cherry-pick t6038 (merge.renormalize): style nitpicks Don't expand CRLFs when normalizing text during merge Try normalizing files to avoid delete/modify conflicts when merging Avoid conflicts when merging branches with mixed normalization Conflicts: builtin/rerere.c t/t4200-rerere.sh
2010-09-03setup_unpack_trees_porcelain: take the whole options struct as parameterMatthieu Moy1-1/+1
This is a preparation patch to let setup_unpack_trees_porcelain set show_all_errors itself. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-03Move set_porcelain_error_msgs to unpack-trees.c and rename itMatthieu Moy1-45/+1
The function is currently dealing only with error messages, but the intent of calling it is really to notify the unpack-tree mechanics that it is running in porcelain mode. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-31Merge branch 'en/d-f-conflict-fix'Junio C Hamano1-19/+88
* en/d-f-conflict-fix: merge-recursive: Avoid excessive output for and reprocessing of renames merge-recursive: Fix multiple file rename across D/F conflict t6031: Add a testcase covering multiple renames across a D/F conflict merge-recursive: Fix typo Mark tests that use symlinks as needing SYMLINKS prerequisite t/t6035-merge-dir-to-symlink.sh: Remove TODO on passing test fast-import: Improve robustness when D->F changes provided in wrong order fast-export: Fix output order of D/F changes merge_recursive: Fix renames across paths below D/F conflicts merge-recursive: Fix D/F conflicts Add a rename + D/F conflict testcase Add additional testcases for D/F conflicts Conflicts: merge-recursive.c
2010-08-27merge-recursive: options to ignore whitespace changesJustin Frankel1-0/+6
Add support for merging with ignoring line endings (specifically --ignore-space-at-eol) when using recursive merging. This is as a strategy-option, so that you can do: git merge --strategy-option=ignore-space-at-eol <branch> and git rebase --strategy-option=ignore-space-at-eol <branch> This can be useful for coping with line-ending damage (Xcode 3.1 has a nasty habit of converting all CRLFs to LFs, and VC6 tends to just use CRLFs for inserted lines). The only option I need is ignore-space-at-eol, but while at it, include the other xdiff whitespace options (ignore-space-change, ignore-all-space), too. [jn: with documentation] Signed-off-by: Justin Frankel <justin@cockos.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-26merge-recursive --patienceJustin Frankel1-0/+3
Teach the merge-recursive strategy a --patience option to use the "patience diff" algorithm, which tends to improve results when cherry-picking a patch that reorders functions at the same time as refactoring them. To support this, struct merge_options and ll_merge_options gain an xdl_opts member, so programs can use arbitrary xdiff flags (think "XDF_IGNORE_WHITESPACE") in a git-aware merge. git merge and git rebase can be passed the -Xpatience option to use this. [jn: split from --ignore-space patch; with documentation] Signed-off-by: Justin Frankel <justin@cockos.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-26ll-merge: replace flag argument with options structJonathan Nieder1-11/+11
Keeping track of the flag bits is proving more trouble than it's worth. Instead, use a pointer to an options struct like most similar APIs do. Callers with no special requests can pass NULL to request the default options. Cc: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Cc: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Helped-by: Justin Frankel <justin@cockos.com> Helped-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-26merge-recursive: expose merge options for builtin mergeJonathan Nieder1-0/+21
There are two very similar blocks of code that recognize options for the "recursive" merge strategy. Unify them. No functional change intended. Cc: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21Merge branch 'hv/submodule-find-ff-merge'Junio C Hamano1-3/+6
* hv/submodule-find-ff-merge: Implement automatic fast-forward merge for submodules setup_revisions(): Allow walking history in a submodule Teach ref iteration module about submodules Conflicts: submodule.c
2010-08-21Merge branch 'dg/local-mod-error-messages'Junio C Hamano1-20/+42
* dg/local-mod-error-messages: t7609: test merge and checkout error messages unpack_trees: group error messages by type merge-recursive: distinguish "removed" and "overwritten" messages merge-recursive: porcelain messages for checkout Turn unpack_trees_options.msgs into an array + enum Conflicts: t/t3400-rebase.sh
2010-08-20merge-recursive: Avoid excessive output for and reprocessing of renamesElijah Newren1-6/+2
In 5a2580d (merge_recursive: Fix renames across paths below D/F conflicts 2010-07-09) and ae74548 (merge-recursive: Fix multiple file rename across D/F conflict 2010-08-17), renames across D/F conflicts were fixed by making process_renames() consider as unprocessed renames whose dst_entry "still" had higher stage entries. The assumption was that those higher stage entries would have been cleared out of dst_entry by that point in cases where the conflict could be resolved (normal renames with no D/F conflicts). That is not the case -- higher stage entries will remain in all cases. Fix this by checking for higher stage entries corresponding to D/F conflicts, namely that stages 2 and 3 have exactly one nonzero mode between them. The nonzero mode stage corresponds to a file at the path, while the stage with a zero mode will correspond to a directory at that path (since rename/delete conflicts will have already been handled before this codepath is reached.) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-18Merge branch 'tf/string-list-init'Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* tf/string-list-init: string_list: Add STRING_LIST_INIT macro and make use of it.
2010-08-18Merge branch 'cc/find-commit-subject'Junio C Hamano1-10/+4
* cc/find-commit-subject: blame: use find_commit_subject() instead of custom code merge-recursive: use find_commit_subject() instead of custom code bisect: use find_commit_subject() instead of custom code revert: rename variables related to subject in get_message() revert: refactor code to find commit subject in find_commit_subject() revert: fix off by one read when searching the end of a commit subject
2010-08-18merge-recursive: Fix multiple file rename across D/F conflictElijah Newren1-0/+1
In 5a2580d (merge_recursive: Fix renames across paths below D/F conflicts 2010-07-09), detection was added for renames across paths involved in a directory<->file conflict. However, the change accidentally involved reusing an outer loop index ('i') in an inner loop, changing its values and causing a slightly different type of breakage for cases where there are multiple renames across the D/F conflict. Fix by creating a new temporary variable 'i'. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-18merge-recursive: Fix typoElijah Newren1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-11unpack_trees: group error messages by typeMatthieu Moy1-6/+19
When an error is encountered, it calls add_rejected_file() which either - directly displays the error message and stops if in plumbing mode (i.e. if show_all_errors is not initialized at 1) - or stores it so that it will be displayed at the end with display_error_msgs(), Storing the files by error type permits to have a list of files for which there is the same error instead of having a serie of almost identical errors. As each bind_overlap error combines a file and an old file, a list cannot be done, therefore, theses errors are not stored but directly displayed. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-11merge-recursive: distinguish "removed" and "overwritten" messagesMatthieu Moy1-5/+8
To limit the number of possible error messages, the error messages for the case would_lose_untracked_file and would_lose_orphaned in unpack_trees_options.msgs were handled with a single string, parameterized by an action string ("overwritten" or "removed"). Instead, we consider them as two different cases, with unparameterized string. This will make it easier to make separate lists sorted by error types later. Only the bind_overlap case still takes two %s parameters, but that's unavoidable. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-11merge-recursive: porcelain messages for checkoutDiane Gasselin1-9/+22
A porcelain message was first added in checkout.c in the commit 8ccba008 (Junio C Hamano, Sat May 17 21:03:49 2008, unpack-trees: allow Porcelain to give different error messages) to give better feedback in the case of merge errors. This patch adapts the porcelain messages for the case of checkout instead. This way, when having a checkout error, "merge" no longer appears in the error message. While we're there, we add an advice in the case of would_lose_untracked_file. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-11Turn unpack_trees_options.msgs into an array + enumMatthieu Moy1-18/+11
The list of error messages was introduced as a structure, but an array indexed over an enum is more flexible, since it allows one to store a type of error message (index in the array) in a variable. This change needs to rename would_lose_untracked -> would_lose_untracked_file to avoid a clash with the function would_lose_untracked in merge-recursive.c. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-06merge-recursive --renormalizeJonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Teach "git merge-recursive" a --renormalize option to enable the merge.renormalize configuration. The --no-renormalize option can be used to override it in the negative. So in the future, you might be able to, e.g.: git checkout -m -Xrenormalize otherbranch or git revert -Xrenormalize otherpatch or git pull --rebase -Xrenormalize The bad part: merge.renormalize is still not honored for most commands. And it reveals lots of places that -X has not been plumbed in (so we get "git merge -Xrenormalize" but not much else). NEEDSWORK: tests Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>