| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We have a bunch of different sites that want to iterate through all
packs of a given `struct packfile_store`. This pattern is somewhat
verbose and repetitive, which makes it somewhat cumbersome.
Introduce a new macro `repo_for_each_pack()` that removes some of the
boilerplate.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The `get_all_packs()` function prepares the packfile store and then
returns its packfiles. Refactor it to accept a packfile store instead of
a repository to clarify its scope.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In the preceding commits we have renamed the structures contained in
"object-store.h" to `struct object_database` and `struct odb_backend`.
As such, the code files "object-store.{c,h}" are confusingly named now.
Rename them to "odb.{c,h}" accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The main function we use to search a pack index for an object is
find_pack_entry_one(). That function still takes a bare pointer to the
hash, despite the fact that its underlying bsearch_pack() function needs
an object_id struct. And so we end up making an extra copy of the hash
into the struct just to do a lookup.
As it turns out, all callers but one already have such an object_id. So
we can just take a pointer to that struct and use it directly. This
avoids the extra copy and provides a more type-safe interface.
The one exception is get_delta_base() in packfile.c, when we are chasing
a REF_DELTA from inside the pack (and thus we have a pointer directly to
the mmap'd pack memory, not a struct). We can just bump the hashcpy()
from inside find_pack_entry_one() to this one caller that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
|
|
Use of the `the_repository` variable is deprecated nowadays, and we
slowly but steadily convert the codebase to not use it anymore. Instead,
callers should be passing down the repository to work on via parameters.
It is hard though to prove that a given code unit does not use this
variable anymore. The most trivial case, merely demonstrating that there
is no direct use of `the_repository`, is already a bit of a pain during
code reviews as the reviewer needs to manually verify claims made by the
patch author. The bigger problem though is that we have many interfaces
that implicitly rely on `the_repository`.
Introduce a new `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE` macro that allows code
units to opt into usage of `the_repository`. The intent of this macro is
to demonstrate that a certain code unit does not use this variable
anymore, and to keep it from new dependencies on it in future changes,
be it explicit or implicit
For now, the macro only guards `the_repository` itself as well as
`the_hash_algo`. There are many more known interfaces where we have an
implicit dependency on `the_repository`, but those are not guarded at
the current point in time. Over time though, we should start to add
guards as required (or even better, just remove them).
Define the macro as required in our code units. As expected, most of our
code still relies on the global variable. Nearly all of our builtins
rely on the variable as there is no way yet to pass `the_repository` to
their entry point. For now, declare the macro in "biultin.h" to keep the
required changes at least a little bit more contained.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In a following commit, we will make it possible to separate objects in
different packfiles depending on a filter.
To make sure that the right objects are in the right packs, let's add a
new test-tool that can display which packfile(s) a given object is in.
Let's also make it possible to check if a given object is in the
expected number of packfiles with a `--check-count <n>` option.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
