Is "E.T. simply an initialism of "Extra-Terrestrial"
Yes, it is.
The novel "2001: A Space Odyssey", written by Arthur C. Clarke was based on the film screenplay written by Clarke and Stanley Kubrick. The novel was was published in 1968, and Chapter 32 is titled Concerning E.T.'s.
The chapter begins with a discussion of how scientists were debating faster-than-light travel, then continues with:
If there was disputation among the physicists, it was nothing compared with that among the biologists, when they discussed the hoary old problem: "What would intelligent extraterrestrials look like?"
[skipping a few paragraphs]
Of course, there would be minor differences like six fingers instead of five, oddly colored skin or hair, and peculiar facial arrangements; but most intelligent extraterrestrials -- usually abbreviated to E.T.'s -- would be so similar to Man that they might not be glanced at twice in poor lighting, or from a distance.
Clarke, who had good science credentials as well as writing credentials, explicitly said "E.T." == "extraterrestrial" almost 20 years before the release of Spielberg's film.
Added after a comment saying "that doesn't show a link to the names Spielberg used in his film":
Spielberg cites this film as highly influential, along with other Kubrick films and other directors (quoted here and here). Although the 2001 film doesn't use the term "extraterrestrial" or its abbreviation, the popularity of the film boosted the popularity of the novel as well.
I can't find a source where Spielberg says he read the novel, but he does talk about making up an extraterrestrial as an imaginary friend as a teenager, several years before the 2001 film and novel were released. For me it's very likely that between 1968 and 1982 Spielberg read the 2001 novel or other science literature that linked the technical word with its abbreviation.