Skip to main content
Corrected some style and grammar
Source Link
Omid
  • 103
  • 3

As a Linux (server side) developer, I don't know where and why should I use C++.

When I'm going tofor performance, the first and last choice is C.

When "performance" isn't the main issue, programming languages like Perl and Python would be good choices.

Almost all of open source applications I know in this area hashave been written in C, Perl and, Python, Bash script, AWK andor even PHP, but no one goes to useuses C++.

I'm not discussing about some other areas like GUI or web applicationapplications, I'm just talking about Linux and about, CLI and daemons.

Is there any satisfiablesatisfactory reason to use C++?

As a Linux (server side) developer, I don't know where and why should I use C++.

When I'm going to performance, the first and last choice is C.

When "performance" isn't the main issue, programming languages like Perl and Python would be good choices.

Almost all of open source applications I know in this area has been written in C, Perl and Python, Bash script, AWK and even PHP, but no one goes to use C++.

I'm not discussing about some other areas like GUI or web application, I'm just talking about Linux and about CLI and daemons.

Is there any satisfiable reason to use C++?

As a Linux (server side) developer, I don't know where and why should I use C++.

When I'm going for performance, the first and last choice is C.

When "performance" isn't the main issue, programming languages like Perl and Python would be good choices.

Almost all open source applications I know in this area have been written in C, Perl, Python, Bash script, AWK or even PHP, but no one uses C++.

I'm not discussing other areas like GUI or web applications, I'm just talking about Linux, CLI and daemons.

Is there any satisfactory reason to use C++?

Post Closed as "Opinion-based" by gnat, Robert Harvey, CommunityBot, Giorgio, Kilian Foth
added 40 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

Is there any reason to use C++ instead of C, Perl, Python, etc.?

As a linuxLinux (server side) developer, I don't know where and why should I use C++.

When I'm going to performance, the first and last choice is C.

When "performance" isn't the main issue, programming languages like perlPerl and pythonPython would be good choices.

Almost all of open source applications I know in this area has been written in C, perlPerl and pythonPython, bashBash script, awkAWK and even phpPHP, but no one goes to use C++.

I'm not discussing about some other areas like GUI or Webweb application, I'm just talking about Linux and about CLI and daemons.

Is there any satisfiable reason to use C++?

Thanks

Is there any reason to use C++ instead of C, Perl, Python, etc?

As a linux (server side) developer, I don't know where and why should I use C++.

When I'm going to performance, the first and last choice is C.

When "performance" isn't the main issue, programming languages like perl and python would be good choices.

Almost all of open source applications I know in this area has been written in C, perl and python, bash script, awk and even php, but no one goes to use C++.

I'm not discussing about some other areas like GUI or Web application, I'm just talking about Linux and about CLI and daemons.

Is there any satisfiable reason to use C++?

Thanks

Is there any reason to use C++ instead of C, Perl, Python, etc.?

As a Linux (server side) developer, I don't know where and why should I use C++.

When I'm going to performance, the first and last choice is C.

When "performance" isn't the main issue, programming languages like Perl and Python would be good choices.

Almost all of open source applications I know in this area has been written in C, Perl and Python, Bash script, AWK and even PHP, but no one goes to use C++.

I'm not discussing about some other areas like GUI or web application, I'm just talking about Linux and about CLI and daemons.

Is there any satisfiable reason to use C++?

Post Made Community Wiki by user32315
edited title
Link
Ehsan
  • 853
  • 3
  • 8
  • 9
corrected spelling in title
Link
ChrisF
  • 39k
  • 11
  • 129
  • 169
Loading
Source Link
Ehsan
  • 853
  • 3
  • 8
  • 9
Loading