Skip to main content
added 9 characters in body
Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71

Is there maybe a more stripped down starting point I should use if the VS template is adding a lot of stuff I don't need?

These VS templates are good to trim down initial setup and learning curve in the beginning, however you would need to customize them for your real project needs.

For example, on this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of bothmix of both make your site veryslick and functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

Is there maybe a more stripped down starting point I should use if the VS template is adding a lot of stuff I don't need?

These VS templates are good to trim down initial setup and learning curve in the beginning, however you would need to customize them for your real project needs.

For example, on this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site very functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

Is there maybe a more stripped down starting point I should use if the VS template is adding a lot of stuff I don't need?

These VS templates are good to trim down initial setup and learning curve in the beginning, however you would need to customize them for your real project needs.

For example, on this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site slick and functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

added 360 characters in body
Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71

Is there maybe a more stripped down starting point I should use if the VS template is adding a lot of stuff I don't need?

OnThese VS templates are good to trim down initial setup and learning curve in the beginning, however you would need to customize them for your real project needs.

For example, on this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJSAngularJS along with ASP.NET MVCASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site very functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

On this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site very functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

Is there maybe a more stripped down starting point I should use if the VS template is adding a lot of stuff I don't need?

These VS templates are good to trim down initial setup and learning curve in the beginning, however you would need to customize them for your real project needs.

For example, on this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site very functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

more references
Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71

The main reason to Not Go all the way with AngularJS is that SEO is not easily achieved with AngularJS.

On this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site very functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

The main reason to Not Go all the way with AngularJS is that SEO is not easily achieved with AngularJS.

On this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site very functional.

Some good references to look:

On this site http://www.reviewstoshare.com, my friend using AngularJS along with ASP.NET MVC. Keep in mind that this site was already built using ASP.MVC + Jquery for in page interaction as needed.

On the other hand there is still some "Ajaxy" nature to the site like comments, voting, flagging etc. Not too different than Stackoverflow itself. Before AngularJS it was a mess of Jquery plugins and functions within $(document).ready() callback, not to mention the JS code was not testable much.

Overall, having a proper mix of both make your site very functional.

enter image description here

Some good references to look:

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71
Loading
Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71
Loading