Skip to main content

In my current organisation, we have several different build environments (like toolset etc.) which are needed for compiling the code of different modules within the same product. I found this a big mess where every engineer, in order to build his or hertheir codebase has to, first has to go through the mundane task of setting up histheir dev machine confining to that modulesmodule's requirements.

For eE.g. recently I had to jump to a different module to code their interface that interacts with mine. ForIn order to do this, I havehad to spend considerable time to actually create a dev environment where atleast the code can at least get compiled. I think this is pretty messy and often ledleads to wasting time doing stupid things.

Is this really a good practice that other companies follow as well? I was wondering if I should write scripts that can do this automatically or this. Is there any other way as well, like having a common build setup that acts as superset for all modules (though it might have some extra stuff in itself)?

In my current organisation, we have several different build environments (like toolset etc.) which are needed for compiling the code of different modules within same product. I found this a big mess where every engineer, in order to build his or her codebase has to first to go through the mundane task of setting up his dev machine confining to that modules requirements.

For e.g. recently I had to jump to a different module to code their interface that interacts with mine. For this I have to spend considerable time to actually create a dev environment where atleast the code can get compiled. I think this is pretty messy and often led to wasting time doing stupid things.

Is this really a good practice that other companies follow as well? I was wondering if I should write scripts that can do this automatically or this any other way as well, like having a common build setup that acts as superset for all modules (though it might have some extra stuff in itself)?

In my current organisation, we have several different build environments (like toolset etc.) which are needed for compiling the code of different modules within the same product. I found this a big mess where every engineer, in order to build their codebase, first has to go through the mundane task of setting up their dev machine confining to that module's requirements.

E.g. recently I had to jump to a different module to code their interface that interacts with mine. In order to do this, I had to spend considerable time to actually create a dev environment where the code can at least get compiled. I think this is pretty messy and often leads to wasting time doing stupid things.

Is this really a good practice that other companies follow as well? I was wondering if I should write scripts that can do this automatically. Is there any other way as well, like having a common build setup that acts as superset for all modules (though it might have some extra stuff in itself)?

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Robert Harvey, gnat, Doc Brown, Bart van Ingen Schenau, Jalayn
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Robert Harvey
  • 200.7k
  • 55
  • 470
  • 683

In my current organisation, we have several different build environments (like toolset etc.) which are needed for compiling the code of different modules within same product. I found this a big mess where every engineer, in order to build his or her codebase has to first to go through the mundane task of setting up his dev machine confining to that modules requirements. 

For e.g. recently I had to jump to a different module to code their interface that interacts with mine. For this I have to spend considerable time to actually create a dev environment where atleast the code can get compiled. I think this is pretty messy and often led to wasting time doing stupid things. 

Is this really a good practice that other companies follow as well? I was wondering if I should write scripts that can do this automatically or this any other way as well, like having a common build setup that acts as superset for all modules (though it might have some extra stuff in itself)?

In my current organisation, we have several different build environments (like toolset etc.) which are needed for compiling the code of different modules within same product. I found this a big mess where every engineer, in order to build his or her codebase has to first to go through the mundane task of setting up his dev machine confining to that modules requirements. For e.g. recently I had to jump to a different module to code their interface that interacts with mine. For this I have to spend considerable time to actually create a dev environment where atleast the code can get compiled. I think this is pretty messy and often led to wasting time doing stupid things. Is this really a good practice that other companies follow as well? I was wondering if I should write scripts that can do this automatically or this any other way as well, like having a common build setup that acts as superset for all modules (though it might have some extra stuff in itself)?

In my current organisation, we have several different build environments (like toolset etc.) which are needed for compiling the code of different modules within same product. I found this a big mess where every engineer, in order to build his or her codebase has to first to go through the mundane task of setting up his dev machine confining to that modules requirements. 

For e.g. recently I had to jump to a different module to code their interface that interacts with mine. For this I have to spend considerable time to actually create a dev environment where atleast the code can get compiled. I think this is pretty messy and often led to wasting time doing stupid things. 

Is this really a good practice that other companies follow as well? I was wondering if I should write scripts that can do this automatically or this any other way as well, like having a common build setup that acts as superset for all modules (though it might have some extra stuff in itself)?

Source Link

Build Environment

In my current organisation, we have several different build environments (like toolset etc.) which are needed for compiling the code of different modules within same product. I found this a big mess where every engineer, in order to build his or her codebase has to first to go through the mundane task of setting up his dev machine confining to that modules requirements. For e.g. recently I had to jump to a different module to code their interface that interacts with mine. For this I have to spend considerable time to actually create a dev environment where atleast the code can get compiled. I think this is pretty messy and often led to wasting time doing stupid things. Is this really a good practice that other companies follow as well? I was wondering if I should write scripts that can do this automatically or this any other way as well, like having a common build setup that acts as superset for all modules (though it might have some extra stuff in itself)?