I have an object with several properties. I would like to remove any properties that have falsy values.
This can be achieved with compact on arrays, but what about objects?
I have an object with several properties. I would like to remove any properties that have falsy values.
This can be achieved with compact on arrays, but what about objects?
Since Underscore version 1.7.0, you can use _.pick:
_.pick(sourceObj, _.identity)
The second parameter to _.pick can be a predicate function for selecting values. Values for which the predicate returns truthy are picked, and values for which the predicate returns falsy are ignored.
pick _.pick(object, *keys)
Return a copy of the object, filtered to only have values for the allowed keys (or array of valid keys). Alternatively accepts a predicate indicating which keys to pick.
_.identity is a helper function that returns its first argument, which means it also works as a predicate function that selects truthy values and rejects falsy ones. The Underscore library also comes with a bunch of other predicates, for instance _.pick(sourceObj, _.isBoolean) would retain only boolean properties.
If you use this technique a lot, you might want to make it a bit more expressive:
var pickNonfalsy = _.partial(_.pick, _, _.identity); // Place this in a library module or something
pickNonfalsy(sourceObj);
Underscore version 1.6.0 provided _.pick as well, but it didn't accept a predicate function instead of a list of keys.
_.identity function, very handy._.omit(sourceObj, _.isUndefined) to remove only undefined values (allowing false, null, 0).pick(obj, Boolean) to eliminate falsey values that same approach can be used when arr.filter(Boolean) to clean an array from falsey values..._.pick(sourceObj, prop => prop)_.pick works with property names, for this functionality as mentioned in post use _.pickByYou could make your own underscore plugin (mixin) :
_.mixin({
compactObject: function(o) {
_.each(o, function(v, k) {
if(!v) {
delete o[k];
}
});
return o;
}
});
And then use it as a native underscore method :
var o = _.compactObject({
foo: 'bar',
a: 0,
b: false,
c: '',
d: null,
e: undefined
});
As @AndreiNeculau pointed out, this mixin affects the original object, while the original compact underscore method returns a copy of the array.
To solve this issue and make our compactObject behave more like it's cousin, here's a minor update:
_.mixin({
compactObject : function(o) {
var clone = _.clone(o);
_.each(clone, function(v, k) {
if(!v) {
delete clone[k];
}
});
return clone;
}
});
_.compact. It will delete properties, rather than create a shallow clone with truthy values only. See stackoverflow.com/a/19750822/465684 belowdelete is generally discouraged as it immediately exposes properties with the same name from the prototype chain and also hurts performance due to "hidden classes" (V8) - changing the object structure causes the engine to do extra work. The best and shortest solution would be _.pick(o, _.identity)._.omitBy( source, i => !i );This is stated in an inverse fashion to Emil's answer. This way imho reads clearer; it's more self explanatory.
Slightly less clean if you don't have the luxury of ES6: _.omitBy( source, function(i){return !i;});
_.omitBy( source, _.isEmpty)Using _.isEmpty, instead of _.identity for truthiness, will also conveniently remove empty arrays and objects from the collection and perhaps inconveniently remove numbers and dates. Thus the outcome is NOT an exact answer to the OP's question, however it could be useful when looking to remove empty collections.
omitBy. lodash.com/docs#omitBy_.pick(source, i => i); which avoids the negation_.pickBy(source) is all that's needed._.isEmpty(5) === true. Thus values that are numbers will be dropped.With lodash's transform,
_.transform(obj, function(res, v, k) {
if (v) res[k] = v;
});
var compactObject = _.partialRight(_.pick, _.identity);_.pickBy(object) is all you needObject.keys(o).forEach(function(k) {
if (!o[k]) {
delete o[k];
}
});
.keys and .forEach.forEach method of JSfor object use delete.
for(var k in obj){
if(obj.hasOwnProperty(k) && !obj[k]){
delete obj[k];
}
}
Suddenly I needed create a function to remove recursively falsies. I hope this helps. I'm using Lodash.
var removeFalsies = function (obj) {
return _.transform(obj, function (o, v, k) {
if (v && typeof v === 'object') {
o[k] = _.removeFalsies(v);
} else if (v) {
o[k] = v;
}
});
};
_.mixin({ 'removeFalsies': removeFalsies });
Then you can use it:
var o = _.removeFalsies({
foo: 'bar',
a: 0,
b: false,
c: '',
d: null,
e: undefined,
obj: {
foo: 'bar',
a: 0,
b: false,
c: '',
d: null,
e: undefined
}
});
// {
// foo: 'bar',
// obj: {
// foo: 'bar'
// }
// }
I do understand the question is asking specifically how to do this with underscore, but since I came here from google, I wanted to add how to do this using ES6, plus, I really like this method
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(obj).filter(([k,v],i)=>v))
The reason is because it creates a new Object (I want it to create a new object without modifying the previous one), uses no libraries, defines no variables, and it doesn't pollute the current scope.
To add to gion_13's answer:
_.mixin({
compactObject : function(o) {
var newObject = {};
_.each(o, function(v, k) {
if(v !== null && v !== undefined) {
newObject[k] = v
}
});
return newObject;
}
});
This one creates a new object and adds keys and values instead of cloning everything and deleting key-value pairs. Minor difference.
But more importantly, checks explicitly for null and undefined instead of falsey, which will delete key-value pairs that have false as a value.
Although _.compact is documented for use in arrays. It seems to work for objects too. I just ran the following in chrome, opera and firefox consoles:
var obj = {first: 1, second: null, third: 3, fourth: function(){return 5}}
undefined
_.compact(obj)
[1, 3, function()]
UPDATE: As the sample indicates calling _.compact on an object will drop the keys and return a compacted array.