3

EDIT: Issue has been solved(partially):It is a simulator bug. I've compiled and tested this on two devices with iOS 3.1.3 and 4.0. The exception was handled correctly. Be careful, the simulator is your enemy!

this is driving me crazy. I don't know how to enable exception handling in my project. Look at the code and debugger output below.

My Goal is to catch the exception, not correcting the code so the exception is handled and the app doesn't crash.

I'm using XCode 3.2.3, iPhone SDK 4 final. I have just created a simple view based iPhone App to test this.

I have looked in my project settings and yes the switch "Enable Objective-C Exceptions" is checked. I am using GCC 4.2.

When I look at the build process in detail the compiler flag -fno-objc-exceptions is not within the list of arguments!

What am I missing here?

Thanks in advance Nick

NSArray * foo = [[NSArray alloc] init];

@try {
   NSLog(@"trying...");  
   [foo objectForKey:@"yeah"];
}
@catch (NSException * e) {
   NSLog(@"catching %@ reason %@", [e name], [e reason]);
}
@finally {
   NSLog(@"finally");
}

leads to

trying...

-[__NSArrayI objectForKey:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x5d5f780

*** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '-[__NSArrayI objectForKey:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x5d5f780'

*** Call stack at first throw:
(
 0   CoreFoundation                      0x02393919 __exceptionPreprocess + 185
 1   libobjc.A.dylib                     0x024e15de objc_exception_throw + 47
 2   CoreFoundation                      0x0239542b -[NSObject(NSObject) doesNotRecognizeSelector:] + 187
 3   CoreFoundation                      0x02305116 ___forwarding___ + 966
 4   CoreFoundation                      0x02304cd2 _CF_forwarding_prep_0 + 50
...
)
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'NSException'

Whether the catch nor the finally block is ever reached.

3 Answers 3

3

Quote from How do I catch global exceptions? : "objc_exception_throw is not an exception. It is the function that throws Objective-C exceptions. Similarly, EXC_ARITHMETIC is not an Objective-C exception; it is a Mach (kernel) exception, meaning that your app tried to do something completely invalid. – Peter Hosey May 14 at 9:14"

That thread does have a link to a solution for your problem though, it appears. The link goes to http://www.restoroot.com/Blog/2008/10/20/crash-reporter-for-iphone-applications-part-2/ which looks a little risky, but if it works, it might be worth it for you.

There are bug reports related to this, e.g.: http://www.openradar.me/8081169 (posted earlier this month)

(Updated to summarize information from comments below.)

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

5 Comments

Thanks for the post I am looking into it.
What I do not understand is: there is an exception in this case: NSInvalidArgumentException which is stated as not caught and it is an instance of NSException. So it seems there are some kind of exception which cannot be caught. Sending an unknown message to an instance of an object is something which should be a common case in such a dynamic language like objective-c, so how to handle such an exception?
That's a good point. Have you looked into NSSetUncaughtExceptionHandler? E.g. stackoverflow.com/questions/1282364/iphone-exception-handling
Yes I did. Apple documentation says on this "Sets the top-level error-handling function where you can perform last-minute logging before the program terminates." The app should not terminate :)
Thanks Kalle, it does look like a bug. A bit sad actually.
1

If I understand your problem right.

Your Try/ catch block is working correctly.

It is trying to run your code, and catches an error. You need to decide what to do when it catches an error and code for it within the block. I normally do that in the CATCH part. As the finally bit will execute regardless of an exception or not being thrown.

9 Comments

The example code is just a simple scenario to force an exception which should be caught.
I THINK because your NSArray is empty, you will not see an error, because nil is always returned.
try This, NSArray * foo = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:@"yeah", @"yeah1", nil]; Instead of NSArray * foo = [[NSArray alloc] init];
You're getting it wrong. I want this exception as it is. It's not about handling NSArray. It's about handling exception which are thrown if you send a message to an object which it doesn't recognize.
Yes after I posted my answer, I realised you are trying to force an error, when I ran you code the first time, I did not get any error returned?. I do now, which means I did something odd!. I am admittedly confused by what you expect to happen.
|
1

Your example code is catching the NSException exception but not the one being thrown, NSInvalidArgumentException. You might have better luck if you look for that specific exception.

NSArray * foo = [[NSArray alloc] init];

@try {
   NSLog(@"trying...");  
   [foo objectForKey:@"yeah"];
}
@catch (NSInvalidArgumentException *e) {
   NSLog(@"Invalid argument called.");
}
@catch (NSException * e) {
   NSLog(@"catching %@ reason %@", [e name], [e reason]);
}
@finally {
   NSLog(@"finally");
}

I don't have any way of testing it myself right now, though.

See http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/ocExceptionHandling.html for more information.

2 Comments

This won't compile as NSInvalidArgumentException is defined as string constants which is no NSException class or a class inheriting fromNSException.
Looks like the reference to openradar.me/8081169 is accurate. I imagine this exception would be handled by NSException but it's currently bugged.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.