1

I have an async function that gets called that loops over an array an calls a function for each item.

In this example, the function is hitting an API endpoint and I need to wait for one item to finish before moving onto the next.

However, what currently happens is that each function gets called at roughly the same time, which is causing issues in the api response. So i need to wait 1 second between each request.

This is what I currently have

const delayedLoop = async () => {
  const delay = (ms) => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, ms));

  const myAsyncFunc = async (i) => {
    console.log(`item ${i}`);
    await delay(0);
    return true;
  };

  const arr = ['one', 'two', 'three'];

  const promises = arr.map(
    (_, i) =>
      new Promise((resolve) =>
        setTimeout(async () => {
          await myAsyncFunc(i);
          resolve(true);
        }, 1000),
      ),
  );
  return Promise.all(promises);
}

const myFunc = async () => {
  console.log('START');
  await delayedLoop();
  console.log('FINISH');
}

myFunc();

What happens is;

  • LogsSTART
  • waits 1 second
  • Logs all item ${i} together (without delay in between)
  • Immediately logs FINISH

What I want to happen is

  • LogsSTART
  • waits 1 second
  • Logs item 1
  • waits 1 second
  • Logs item 2
  • waits 1 second
  • Logs item 3
  • Immediately logs FINISH

See JSFiddle to see it in action

11
  • await delay(0); seems to be the problem. I think it should be await delay(1000); Commented Jul 19, 2022 at 12:41
  • 1
    That just extends the time between the last item ${i} log and the FINISH log, see here jsfiddle.net/a4pu6s7q Commented Jul 19, 2022 at 12:42
  • Oh. Then why does that function exist at all? Commented Jul 19, 2022 at 12:43
  • Just to emulate the api call, as it's an async function that performs some logic Commented Jul 19, 2022 at 12:44
  • 1
    @EmilKarlsson No, delay(0) is not the problem. The problem is arr.map() which creates and starts all promises at the same time ... Commented Jul 19, 2022 at 12:44

1 Answer 1

4

You can do, it like this, using a simple for-loop:

const delayedLoop = async () => {
  const delay = (ms) => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, ms));

  const myAsyncFunc = async (i) => {
    console.log(`item ${i}`);
    return true;
  };

  const arr = ['one', 'two', 'three'];
  for(let i=0; i < arr.length; i++) {
     await myAsyncFunc(i);
     await delay(1000);
  }
}

const myFunc = async () => {
  console.log('START');
  await delayedLoop();
  console.log('FINISH');
}

myFunc();

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Thanks, this works perfectly! I didn't relalise, as mentioned in another comment, that arr.map starts all promises at the same time and using a for loop is the preferred method for this!
@mcclosa arr.map doesn't start any promises, you do ->new Promise(, all map does is map, there is no wait logic built in. There are map versions you can use that are promise aware, bluebirds map is one, but even better is has a concurrency option, and that can come in very handy.. Or even this -> npmjs.com/package/promise.map

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.