22

I'm creating a mock data source that I want to be able to pass in a list of SortExpressions on.

public SortExpression(string name, SortDirection direction)
{
     this.name = name;
     this.direction = direction;
}

Update with Jon Skeet's code and also the entire class. GetData() is just populating the object with x number of records.

public class Data
{

public int Id { get; set; }
public Guid gId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Phone { get; set; }
public string Address { get; set; }
public DateTime Created { get; set; }
public string SortMe { get; set; }
public static List<Data> GetFakeData(int start, int numberToFetch, IList<SortExpression> sortExpressions, IList<FilterExpression> filterExpressions, out int totalRecords)
{
    DataCollection items = GetData();
    IEnumerable<Data> query = from item in items select item;

    bool sortExpressionsExist = sortExpressions != null;
    if (sortExpressionsExist)
    {
        // Won't be read in the first iteration; will be written to
        IOrderedEnumerable<Data> orderedQuery = null;
        for (int i = 0; i < sortExpressions.Count; i++)
        {
            // Avoid single variable being captured: capture one per iteration.
            // Evil bug which would be really hard to find :)
            int copyOfI = i;
            // Tailor "object" depending on what GetProperty returns.
            Func<Data, object> expression = item =>
                  item.GetType().GetProperty(sortExpressions[copyOfI].Name);

            if (sortExpressions[i].Direction == SortDirection.Ascending)
            {
                orderedQuery = (i == 0) ? query.OrderBy(expression)
                                        : orderedQuery.ThenBy(expression);
            }
            else
            {
                orderedQuery = (i == 0) ? query.OrderByDescending(expression)
                                        : orderedQuery.ThenByDescending(expression);
            }
        }
        query = orderedQuery;
    }

    bool filterExpressionsExist = filterExpressions != null;
    if (filterExpressionsExist)
    {
        foreach (var filterExpression in filterExpressions)
        {
            query.Where(item => item.GetType().GetProperty(filterExpression.ColumnName).GetValue(item, null).ToString().Contains(filterExpression.Text));
        }
    }
    totalRecords = query.Count();


       return query.Skip(start).Take(numberToFetch).ToList<Data>();
    }
}

Doesn't seem to be doing anything. Compiles, no errors, just no sort. Any ideas?

6 Answers 6

27

There are two problems. The first is the one others have alluded to - you need to use the value returned by OrderBy etc. The second is that each time you call OrderBy, that's adding a new "primary" ordering. You really want ThenBy after the first ordering has been applied. That makes it pretty ugly, unfortunately. It's still pretty ugly after a refactoring, but not too bad...

IEnumerable<Data> query = from item in items select item;
if (sortExpressionsExist)
{
    // Won't be read in the first iteration; will be written to
    IOrderedEnumerable<Data> orderedQuery = null;
    for (int i = 0; i < sortExpressions.Count; i++)
    {
        // Avoid single variable being captured: capture one per iteration.
        // Evil bug which would be really hard to find :)
        int copyOfI = i;
        // Tailor "object" depending on what GetProperty returns.
        Func<Data, object> expression = item => 
              item.GetType()
                  .GetProperty(sortExpressions[copyOfI].Name)
                  .GetValue(item, null);

        if (sortExpressions[i].Direction == SortDirection.Ascending)
        {
            orderedQuery = (i == 0) ? query.OrderBy(expression)
                                    : orderedQuery.ThenBy(expression);
        }
        else
        {
            orderedQuery = (i == 0) ? query.OrderByDescending(expression)
                                    : orderedQuery.ThenByDescending(expression);
        }
    }
    query = orderedQuery;
}
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

9 Comments

Yeah, that's why I'm doing the for loop instead of the foreach, because I was thinking that I needed a ThenBy in there someplace.
I've just fixed a bug, by the way - you need the copyOfI part as otherwise the wrong variable will be captured!
Yeah, got that part. I'll refresh to see if you did any further updates.
So what's it doing? Sorting at all? Sorting by just the first field? Just the last?
No sorting at all. Same as before.
|
5

OrderBy returns a new IEnumerable, so you need to do something like:

IEnumerable<Data> results 
    = query.OrderBy(item => item.GetType().GetProperty(sortExpressions[i].Name));

Comments

2

OrderBy on IEnumerable returns returns an IOrderedEnumerable. It does not sort them in line. So get the return value from your .OrderBy and you will be fine.

Comments

2

The OrderBy/OrderByDescending 'operators' work like String.ToUpper(), i.e., they take the thing you invoke it on, and yield a 'copy' that has what you asked for.

In other words, instead of saying:

query.Orderby(item->item.X)

you should do

query = query.Orderby(item->item.X)

or

sortedResult = query.Orderby(item->item.X)

[And as Jon Skeet points out, use ThenBy/ThenByDescending as in his answer]

Comments

2

The query is not mutable, so OrderBy returns a new object. You need to make the same call, but add "query =" to the beginning.

query = query.OrderBy(item => item.GetType().GetProperty(sortExpressions[i].Name));

Comments

2

This will work:

YourCollection.Orderby(item => item.Property1).ThenBy(item => item.Property2);

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.