You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
|
2
|
3
(6) |
4
(1) |
5
(5) |
6
|
7
(11) |
8
|
|
9
|
10
(2) |
11
(3) |
12
(1) |
13
|
14
|
15
(3) |
|
16
(4) |
17
(5) |
18
(10) |
19
(4) |
20
(2) |
21
(8) |
22
(12) |
|
23
(6) |
24
(7) |
25
|
26
(7) |
27
(5) |
28
(1) |
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2014-11-01 18:31:51
|
On 2014/11/01, 5:49 AM, Thomas Caswell wrote: > Does anyone protest to removing all of the branches from the main repo > except: > > - master > - v1.4.x > - v1.4.2-doc > > Having old branches around can lead to confusion (see > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/3748#issuecomment-61372162). > > Tom Seems to me like a good idea. Eric |
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2014-11-01 17:49:36
|
I think this is reasonable. If anything, I *might* want to keep N+1 branches, but that might be too much. On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Joel B. Mohler <jo...@ki...> wrote: > On 11/01/2014 11:49 AM, Thomas Caswell wrote: > > Does anyone protest to removing all of the branches from the main repo > > except: > > > > - master > > - v1.4.x > > - v1.4.2-doc > > > > As a person who was distracted by too many branches in that list, I > fully support this. > > Joel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > |
|
From: Joel B. M. <jo...@ki...> - 2014-11-01 16:31:49
|
On 11/01/2014 11:49 AM, Thomas Caswell wrote: > Does anyone protest to removing all of the branches from the main repo > except: > > - master > - v1.4.x > - v1.4.2-doc > As a person who was distracted by too many branches in that list, I fully support this. Joel |
|
From: Thomas C. <tca...@gm...> - 2014-11-01 16:23:42
|
Todd, The tags would not go anywhere, just the branches would be removed. The tags are for releases, branches are for active work and there should be no active work on anything but those three branches. Tom On Sat, Nov 1, 2014, 12:14 Todd <tod...@gm...> wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2014 4:49 PM, "Thomas Caswell" <tca...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Does anyone protest to removing all of the branches from the main repo > except: > > > > - master > > - v1.4.x > > - v1.4.2-doc > > > > Having old branches around can lead to confusion (see > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/3748#issuecomment-61372162). > > > > Tom > > What about having a "matplotlib/matplotlib-archive" fork where old > branches and tags can be kept? That way someone can always go back and > install an old version if they really need to. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > |
|
From: Todd <tod...@gm...> - 2014-11-01 16:14:08
|
On Nov 1, 2014 4:49 PM, "Thomas Caswell" <tca...@gm...> wrote: > > Does anyone protest to removing all of the branches from the main repo except: > > - master > - v1.4.x > - v1.4.2-doc > > Having old branches around can lead to confusion (see https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/3748#issuecomment-61372162). > > Tom What about having a "matplotlib/matplotlib-archive" fork where old branches and tags can be kept? That way someone can always go back and install an old version if they really need to. |
|
From: Thomas C. <tca...@gm...> - 2014-11-01 15:49:12
|
Does anyone protest to removing all of the branches from the main repo except: - master - v1.4.x - v1.4.2-doc Having old branches around can lead to confusion (see https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/3748#issuecomment-61372162). Tom |