Menu
▾
▴
matplotlib-devel — matplotlib developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
(10) |
3
(2) |
|
4
|
5
(2) |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
(3) |
10
|
|
11
(1) |
12
(2) |
13
(2) |
14
(5) |
15
(5) |
16
(5) |
17
(1) |
|
18
(1) |
19
(1) |
20
(5) |
21
(2) |
22
(4) |
23
(1) |
24
(3) |
|
25
(14) |
26
(6) |
27
(6) |
28
(7) |
29
(2) |
30
|
|
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2010-04-26 18:40:23
|
On 04/26/2010 02:37 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > Michael Droettboom wrote: >> I'm noticing that SVN r8269 is failing a great number of regression >> tests -- with pretty major things like the number of digits in the >> formatter being different. The buildbot seems to be getting the same >> failures I am, but I don't see any buildbot e-mails since Wednesday. >> Does anyone know the source of these errors? It seems to have to do >> with changes to the formatters. > > Mike, > > What is the easiest way to run a single test? I want to work on one > failure at at time. You can provide a dot-separated path to the module and function, eg. (this is assuming the test is installed): nosetests matplotlib.tests.test_simplification:test_clipping Mike > > Eric > > >> >> Mike >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Matplotlib-devel mailing list >> Mat...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2010-04-26 18:37:13
|
Michael Droettboom wrote: > I'm noticing that SVN r8269 is failing a great number of regression > tests -- with pretty major things like the number of digits in the > formatter being different. The buildbot seems to be getting the same > failures I am, but I don't see any buildbot e-mails since Wednesday. > Does anyone know the source of these errors? It seems to have to do > with changes to the formatters. Mike, What is the easiest way to run a single test? I want to work on one failure at at time. Eric > > Mike > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2010-04-26 17:10:53
|
Michael Droettboom wrote: > I'm noticing that SVN r8269 is failing a great number of regression > tests -- with pretty major things like the number of digits in the > formatter being different. The buildbot seems to be getting the same > failures I am, but I don't see any buildbot e-mails since Wednesday. > Does anyone know the source of these errors? It seems to have to do > with changes to the formatters. I suspect I'm the culprit. I will look into it. Eric > > Mike > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2010-04-26 16:59:29
|
I'm noticing that SVN r8269 is failing a great number of regression tests -- with pretty major things like the number of digits in the formatter being different. The buildbot seems to be getting the same failures I am, but I don't see any buildbot e-mails since Wednesday. Does anyone know the source of these errors? It seems to have to do with changes to the formatters. Mike |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2010-04-26 16:17:40
|
Thanks. I can confirm this with today's SVN. I'm looking into the cause.
Mike
On 04/25/2010 07:11 PM, Tom Aldcroft wrote:
> import numpy
> import matplotlib
> matplotlib.use('Agg')
> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>
> y = numpy.array([
> 4., 2., 2., 3., 3., 2., 2., 6., 6., 5., 5., 4., 4.,
> 7., 7., 2., 2., 4., 4., 2., 2., 2., 2., 4., 4., 4.,
> 4., 4., 4., 7., 7., 3., 3., 5., 5., 4., 4., 5., 5.,
> 4., 4., 7., 7., 6., 6., 2., 2., 2., 2., 5., 5., 4.,
> 4., 4., 4., 6., 6., 3., 3., 4., 4., 3., 3., 2., 2.,
> 3., 3., 4., 4., 4., 4., 4., 4., 6., 6., 5., 5., 4.,
> 4., 7., 7., 3., 3., 4., 4., 4., 4., 5., 5., 4., 4.,
> 7., 7., 3., 3., 4., 4., 4., 4., 6., 6., 4., 4., 4.,
> 4., 4., 4., 2., 2., 5., 5., 6., 6., 3., 3., 5., 5.,
> 4., 4., 0., 0., 5., 5., 1., 1., 4., 4., 5., 5., 4.])
>
> plt.figure(figsize=(7,4))
> plt.plot(y)
> plt.savefig('test.png')
>
> plt.xlim(-12000, 8274)
> plt.savefig('test_panned.png')
>
|
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2010-04-26 15:00:31
|
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Miguel de Val Borro <mig...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > The amplitude of sharp peaks is not shown correctly when several plots > are stitched together and the x scale becomes very large. I have > noticed this problem with the pdf and png backends in the attached > script. This is a known bug which is fixed in svn. You need to set path.simplify : False in your matplotlibrc http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/customizing.html |
