You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
(3) |
|
3
(5) |
4
(8) |
5
(1) |
6
(4) |
7
(8) |
8
(1) |
9
|
|
10
(9) |
11
(3) |
12
(5) |
13
(1) |
14
(13) |
15
|
16
(4) |
|
17
|
18
(1) |
19
(2) |
20
(4) |
21
(1) |
22
(6) |
23
(6) |
|
24
(4) |
25
(14) |
26
(2) |
27
|
28
(13) |
29
(1) |
30
(1) |
|
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Jason G. <jas...@cr...> - 2010-10-26 17:52:56
|
On 10/23/10 10:35 PM, jas...@cr... wrote: > On 10/22/10 7:16 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> On 10/22/2010 05:45 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote: >>> I'm curious when the next release of matplotlib is due. >>> >>> My application is suffering badly from the issue that an incorrect font >>> cache will cause matplotlib to fail (the application mysteriously exits >>> partway through startup until the user deletes the font cache). >>> >>> That problem is allegedly fixed on the trunk and I'm trying to decide >>> how best to deal with it. Depending on the timing of 1.0.1 I can decide >>> whether it's worth putting in my own workaround, bundling a prerelease >>> version of matplotlib or just waiting for the official release. >> I'm not sure what the timeframe is on 1.0.1. >> >> What problem with the cache are you referring to? I'm aware of a >> problem where if some fonts are moved or removed after the cache is >> created matplotlib will crash (and this problem is fixed in the trunk), >> but is that really a problem in everyday practice? I'm just curious -- >> if there's another issue with the cache that I'm not aware of, I'd like >> to fix it. >> ' > > > We've been running into problems in Sage that seem to occur because font > caches from 1.0.0 make old versions of matplotlib die. I haven't seen > the problem myself, but several Sage developers have put in quite a bit > of time in diagnosing the problem. In the end, I think they wrote a > patch to do custom MPLCONFIGDIR for different versions of matplotlib in > different versions of Sage. > > I'm CCing sage-devel, in case one of the sage devs that ran into > problems wants to comment. > John Palmieri asked me to forward his response (below) about the problems Sage has been having with matplotlib and backward incompatibility: Thanks, Jason ========================================================== The Sage developers have found two issues with MPLCONFIGDIR: - First, when upgrading from version 0.99.3 to 1.0.0, the contents of that directory seem to cause compatibility problems. That is, once you upgrade to a version of Sage using 1.0.0, it overwrites whatever was in that directory, and then you get errors when using an older version of Sage which still uses 0.99.3. See <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9221#comment:82> for an example of the sort of error which arises, and see <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6235> for our fix: in Sage, we set MPLCONFIGDIR to different directories based on the version of matplotlib. - Second, the following code in matplotlib/texmanager.py can cause a race condition when creating MPLCONFIGDIR: if not os.path.exists(DIR): os.mkdir(DIR) In particular, when running doctests for Sage, if MPLCONFIGDIR doesn't exist, two different doctests can try to create it at the same time, causing a problem. (I've also heard people suggest that these sort of race conditions can be security issues, but I don't know about the validity of this.) See <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10159> for our fix: we replace those lines by try: os.mkdir(DIR) except OSError, e: if e.errno == errno.EEXIST: pass else: raise (and also add "import errno" at the beginning of the file). I'd be happy to hear any comments you might have about these. -- John Palmieri jhp...@gm... |
|
From: Jelmer C. <j.c...@su...> - 2010-10-26 10:31:10
|
Hello, recently I upgraded to matplotlib 1.0.0 which I mainly use for plotting in my (python 2.6 based) application with Qt4 GUI. Overall it works fine, but there are a few issues I experienced also with the previous version, especially with the toolbar. When building a standalone version using py2exe, images of the toolbar are missing. I had to manually modify the .svg extensions to .png in the _init_toolbar() function in backend_qt4.py. And for the new 'qt4_editor_options' option, no png existed yet. Since I wanted to get rid of some toolbar functions in my standalone app, I wanted to create my own backend. But following the instructions in the backend_template.py didn't help me much. In the comments at the beginning of this file it says: "...add 'xxx' to the switchyard in matplotlib/backends/__init__.py and 'xxx' to the backends list in the validate_backend methon in matplotlib/__init__.py and you're off." Unfortunately it doesn't work this way (anymore). Is it possible to update the instructions on doing your own backend? Updating the Qt4 backend would help as well. I know this is not the right place for feature requests, but anyway: it would be nice to have some flexibility in modifying the toolbar (which functions to add or not,etc). Now I do it the quick and dirty way: I comment out the toolbar items in the _init_toolbar() function in backend_qt4.py. However, depending on the app I'm working on, I have to comment/uncomment it... Kind regards, Jelmer --Disclaimer-- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and are intended solely for the use of the entity / individual to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error or If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by way of telephone or email and delete this message and any files transmitted from your system. Please note that any views presented in the email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the organization. While all care has been taken to avoid viruses the recipient is advised to check this email and attachments for presence of viruses. The organization accepts no liability on this account. |