You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
|
2
(5) |
3
(1) |
4
|
5
|
6
(20) |
7
(1) |
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
(2) |
12
(1) |
13
(1) |
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
(1) |
18
(1) |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
(2) |
24
(4) |
25
(4) |
26
(3) |
27
(2) |
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Paul I. <pi...@be...> - 2014-03-26 22:11:06
|
Nelle Varoquaux, on 2014-03-26 21:27, wrote:
> > Does anyone know why we are seeing a huge number of PEP 8 failures now?
> > It looks to me like it is a change in which modules are subject to the
> > test, or in which tests are grounds for failure. I don't know how all
> > this is set up, though.
>
> If it started very recently, it could be linked to the new release. They
> have started to make "none backward" compatible version, in the sense that
> the stylechecker is increasingly strict. It is very annoying...
Can we not revisit (and possibly revert) the morally absolutist
PEP-8 or death position that matplotlib has taken?
Quoting GvR (emphasis mine):
All I want to say is, people lighten up. The style guide
can't solve all your problems. You are never going to have
all code compliant. Use the style guide when it helps, *ignore
it when it's in the way*
And from that same email:
Let's try to make new stdlib modules use the best style we
can think of, but limit the time spent fretting over code
that's already there.
The rest of the message is useful to read:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105681.html
Another reason for not being so rigid about PEP-8 is that its a
living document. Are we really doing massive search-and-replace
changes to the codebase just to comply with a moving target?
best,
--
_
/ \
A* \^ -
,./ _.`\\ / \
/ ,--.S \/ \
/ `"~,_ \ \
__o ?
_ \<,_ /:\
--(_)/-(_)----.../ | \
--------------.......J
Paul Ivanov
http://pirsquared.org
|
|
From: Nelle V. <nel...@gm...> - 2014-03-26 20:27:19
|
> Does anyone know why we are seeing a huge number of PEP 8 failures now? > It looks to me like it is a change in which modules are subject to the > test, or in which tests are grounds for failure. I don't know how all > this is set up, though. > If it started very recently, it could be linked to the new release. They have started to make "none backward" compatible version, in the sense that the stylechecker is increasingly strict. It is very annoying... > > Eric > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2014-03-26 20:09:57
|
Does anyone know why we are seeing a huge number of PEP 8 failures now? It looks to me like it is a change in which modules are subject to the test, or in which tests are grounds for failure. I don't know how all this is set up, though. Eric |