You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(5) |
3
(1) |
4
(5) |
5
|
|
6
(2) |
7
(3) |
8
(1) |
9
|
10
(7) |
11
(13) |
12
|
|
13
|
14
(1) |
15
|
16
(2) |
17
|
18
(6) |
19
(2) |
|
20
(1) |
21
(14) |
22
(12) |
23
(15) |
24
(11) |
25
(15) |
26
|
|
27
|
28
(1) |
29
|
30
(1) |
31
(2) |
|
|
|
From: Chris B. <chr...@no...> - 2013-10-31 15:49:43
|
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Todd <tod...@gm...> wrote: > I think one thing that contributes a lot to the API issues is the > inconsistency between pyplot API and the OO API. There isn't any reason > the APIs need to be so different. > indeed. I hadn't even realized how different they were. > So the idea would be to have essentially all of the pyplot functions just > be wrappers for methods from other classes, using the same name and same > call signature (minus "self"). All of the actual functionality would be > implemented in the methods, the pyplot functions should not have any logic > or tests. > + inf However, doing this with full backward compatibility could be a real challenge... This will make it easy to transition between the two, learning to use the > OO interface would just involve learning what object the pyplot function is > targeting (this should be in the pyplot function docstring). > That would help, though a namespace without any non-OO stuff would be still be good, and, of course, docs and tutorials. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chr...@no... |
|
From: mark <ma...@me...> - 2013-10-31 14:17:56
|
Thank you all for the thoughts so far I have raised a pull request: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2554 To be clear, this is a 'structure only' pull request, I have made no documentation changes as yet. I see this as a part of the process. If we can agree structure we can work on aspects of the user guide, adding content into appropriate sections. all the best mark On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:19:59 +0000 mark <ma...@me...> wrote: > hi matplotlib developers > > I have been considering the matplotlib user guide structure and it > has occured to me that there are two user guides interleaved here: > 1. Introduction for new users > 2. Library tour for developers > > I think that this structure makes it challenging for new users to > benefit from the user guide as much as they could. > > I would like to see the user guide separated into two sections, with > the two different audiences in mind. I feel this would enable new > users of the library to have a more targeted introduction to some of > the neat features without getting bogged down in details they are > unlikely to need (or comprehend). > > I am very happy to have a go at this and put up a set of suggested > changes but I would value input from the community on this approach > and my category suggestions before I submit a pull request. > > many thanks > mark > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the > most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts > and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel > mailing list Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel |