You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(2) |
3
(7) |
|
4
(3) |
5
(17) |
6
(20) |
7
(11) |
8
(19) |
9
(3) |
10
(7) |
|
11
(4) |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
(2) |
16
(5) |
17
(1) |
|
18
(8) |
19
(8) |
20
(10) |
21
(6) |
22
(16) |
23
(4) |
24
(1) |
|
25
(4) |
26
(4) |
27
(6) |
28
(2) |
29
(3) |
30
(7) |
31
(2) |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2010-07-15 17:37:50
|
On 07/14/2010 11:46 PM, Ben North wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly, excellent to see matplotlib reach its 1.0 release!
>
> I came across an inconsistency in the way XAxis and YAxis behave in the
> set_ticks_position() method. If you remove the X-axis ticks with
>
> my_axes.xaxis.set_ticks_position('none')
>
> it leaves the labels alone, whereas if you do the same on the Y-axis:
>
> my_axes.yaxis.set_ticks_position('none')
>
> it removes both sets of labels. The docstring for the X-axis method
> says "'none' and 'both' affect only the ticks, not the labels", and
> although the Y-axis docstring doesn't have this phrase, I guess it's
> probably intended that the labels are left alone there too. The patch
> below does this.
Ben,
Thank you. Behavior and docstring are fixed in 8554, 8555.
Eric
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben.
>
>
>
> --- ORIG--axis.py 2010-07-15 10:37:08.000068000 +0100
> +++ axis.py 2010-07-15 10:43:14.000195000 +0100
> @@ -1906,8 +1906,8 @@
> self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=True,
> left=True)
> elif position == 'none':
> - self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=False, labelright=False,
> - left=False, labelleft=False)
> + self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=False,
> + left=False)
> elif position == 'default':
> self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=True, labelright=False,
> left=True, labelleft=True)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
|
|
From: Ben N. <be...@re...> - 2010-07-15 10:17:37
|
Hi,
Firstly, excellent to see matplotlib reach its 1.0 release!
I came across an inconsistency in the way XAxis and YAxis behave in the
set_ticks_position() method. If you remove the X-axis ticks with
my_axes.xaxis.set_ticks_position('none')
it leaves the labels alone, whereas if you do the same on the Y-axis:
my_axes.yaxis.set_ticks_position('none')
it removes both sets of labels. The docstring for the X-axis method
says "'none' and 'both' affect only the ticks, not the labels", and
although the Y-axis docstring doesn't have this phrase, I guess it's
probably intended that the labels are left alone there too. The patch
below does this.
Thanks,
Ben.
--- ORIG--axis.py 2010-07-15 10:37:08.000068000 +0100
+++ axis.py 2010-07-15 10:43:14.000195000 +0100
@@ -1906,8 +1906,8 @@
self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=True,
left=True)
elif position == 'none':
- self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=False, labelright=False,
- left=False, labelleft=False)
+ self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=False,
+ left=False)
elif position == 'default':
self.set_tick_params(which='both', right=True, labelright=False,
left=True, labelleft=True)
|