You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(8) |
2
(3) |
3
(3) |
4
(11) |
5
(1) |
|
6
(10) |
7
(1) |
8
(24) |
9
(4) |
10
(2) |
11
(3) |
12
(1) |
|
13
(4) |
14
(2) |
15
(6) |
16
|
17
(9) |
18
(12) |
19
(4) |
|
20
(4) |
21
(6) |
22
(10) |
23
(17) |
24
(2) |
25
|
26
|
|
27
(1) |
28
(17) |
29
(4) |
30
(5) |
|
|
|
|
From: David Warde-F. <dw...@cs...> - 2009-09-18 23:34:10
|
On 18-Sep-09, at 6:42 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote: > File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/ > python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/Shell.py", line > 627, in __init__ > user_ns,user_global_ns,b2 = > self._matplotlib_config(name,user_ns,user_global_ns) > File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/ > python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/Shell.py", line > 556, in _matplotlib_config > import matplotlib.pylab as pylab > File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/ > python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/pylab.py", line 206, in <module> > from matplotlib import mpl # pulls in most modules > File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/ > python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl.py", line 1, in <module> > from matplotlib import artist > File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/ > python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/artist.py", line 5, in <module> > from transforms import Bbox, IdentityTransform, TransformedBbox, > TransformedPath > File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/ > python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/transforms.py", line 34, in > <module> > from matplotlib._path import affine_transform > ImportError: numpy.core.multiarray failed to import Looking a little harder at this (after downloading the source) I'm positively at a loss, since multiarray doesn't seem to be explicitly imported anywhere in matplotlib. Furthermore, importing numpy.core.multiarray from ipython works just fine. Moreover, I just built matplotlib-0.99.1rc1 from source and the problem doesn't manifest. _Weird_. Any idea what's going on? David |
|
From: David Warde-F. <dw...@cs...> - 2009-09-18 22:42:48
|
On 18-Sep-09, at 6:09 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> Could you try the 99.1rc release candidate linked to in the "news"
> box on the mpl homepage? I did fix some link problems in the osx
> binaries since 0.99.0.
Just tried, unfortunately it doesn't seem to like my setup either:
RuntimeError: FATAL: module compiled aslittle endian, but detected
different endianness at runtime
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/bin/
ipython", line 8, in <module>
load_entry_point('ipython==0.10', 'console_scripts', 'ipython')()
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/ipapi.py", line
556, in launch_new_instance
ses = make_session(user_ns,shellclass)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/ipapi.py", line
684, in make_session
return IPython.Shell.start(user_ns)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/Shell.py", line
1241, in start
return shell(user_ns = user_ns)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/Shell.py", line
1106, in __init__
shell_class=MatplotlibShell)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/Shell.py", line
73, in __init__
debug=debug,shell_class=shell_class)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/ipmaker.py",
line 100, in make_IPython
embedded=embedded,**kw)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/Shell.py", line
627, in __init__
user_ns,user_global_ns,b2 =
self._matplotlib_config(name,user_ns,user_global_ns)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/ipython-0.10-py2.6.egg/IPython/Shell.py", line
556, in _matplotlib_config
import matplotlib.pylab as pylab
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/pylab.py", line 206, in <module>
from matplotlib import mpl # pulls in most modules
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl.py", line 1, in <module>
from matplotlib import artist
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/artist.py", line 5, in <module>
from transforms import Bbox, IdentityTransform, TransformedBbox,
TransformedPath
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/transforms.py", line 34, in <module>
from matplotlib._path import affine_transform
ImportError: numpy.core.multiarray failed to import
|
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2009-09-18 22:10:19
|
Could you try the 99.1rc release candidate linked to in the "news" box on the mpl homepage? I did fix some link problems in the osx binaries since 0.99.0. On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:53 PM, David Warde-Farley <dw...@cs...> wrote: > Using the binaries at matplotlib.sf.net: > > > dwf@strafe:~$ ipython -pylab > Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Apr 16 2009, 09:17:39) > Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > > IPython 0.10 -- An enhanced Interactive Python. > ? -> Introduction and overview of IPython's features. > %quickref -> Quick reference. > help -> Python's own help system. > object? -> Details about 'object'. ?object also works, ?? prints > more. > > Welcome to pylab, a matplotlib-based Python environment. > For more information, type 'help(pylab)'. > > In [1]: matplotlib.__version__Out[1]: '0.99.0' > > In [2]: matplotlib.get_backend() > Out[2]: 'TkAgg' > > In [3]: plt.figure() > Bus error > > > GDB says this was the problem: > >>>> fig = plt.figure() > > Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. > Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000028 > 0x00e04d95 in PyArray_INCREF () > > I wonder if this is caused by me having my own freetype installed > under /usr/local (I was installing Chaco the other day from source, > and thus required it), and the dynamic linker getting confused about > which version to use? > > David > > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and > stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register > now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel |
|
From: David Warde-F. <dw...@cs...> - 2009-09-18 21:53:57
|
Using the binaries at matplotlib.sf.net: dwf@strafe:~$ ipython -pylab Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Apr 16 2009, 09:17:39) Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. IPython 0.10 -- An enhanced Interactive Python. ? -> Introduction and overview of IPython's features. %quickref -> Quick reference. help -> Python's own help system. object? -> Details about 'object'. ?object also works, ?? prints more. Welcome to pylab, a matplotlib-based Python environment. For more information, type 'help(pylab)'. In [1]: matplotlib.__version__Out[1]: '0.99.0' In [2]: matplotlib.get_backend() Out[2]: 'TkAgg' In [3]: plt.figure() Bus error GDB says this was the problem: >>> fig = plt.figure() Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000028 0x00e04d95 in PyArray_INCREF () I wonder if this is caused by me having my own freetype installed under /usr/local (I was installing Chaco the other day from source, and thus required it), and the dynamic linker getting confused about which version to use? David |
|
From: Sandro T. <mat...@gm...> - 2009-09-18 18:31:59
|
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:44, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > Thanks. The subslicing optimization added in 0.99 was truncating the polar > path. Subslicing has been made more "cautious" now and will only be applied > when the axes are rectilinear and non-logarithmic. > > Interestingly, there was already a test in the test framework for this bug, > but the baseline image was wrong :) Thanks for fixing this :) Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |
|
From: Sandro T. <mat...@gm...> - 2009-09-18 18:31:31
|
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:16, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > I filed a report at > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=80706&atid=560720. Ok, next time I'll file a bug on SF issue tracker instead of writing here. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |
|
From: Andrew S. <str...@as...> - 2009-09-18 16:53:05
|
Michael Droettboom wrote: > Thanks. The subslicing optimization added in 0.99 was truncating the > polar path. Subslicing has been made more "cautious" now and will only > be applied when the axes are rectilinear and non-logarithmic. > > Interestingly, there was already a test in the test framework for this > bug, but the baseline image was wrong :) I see you fixed that, too -- thanks. I can't remember the history of this one particular test -- I think maybe I inherited it without a test image or perhaps I just over-enthusiastically copied a broken image without realizing it as such. These unit tests have already shown their worth I think (fixing non-deterministic layout, getting a grip on freetype, etc.), and their value in preventing mistakes and regressions from creeping in is hard to perceive but I think is also very real. As more and more tests are added (and broken baseline images and test cases are fixed), the number of regressions will almost certainly drop. -Andrew |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2009-09-18 15:44:16
|
Thanks. The subslicing optimization added in 0.99 was truncating the
polar path. Subslicing has been made more "cautious" now and will only
be applied when the axes are rectilinear and non-logarithmic.
Interestingly, there was already a test in the test framework for this
bug, but the baseline image was wrong :)
Mike
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi all,
> with the simple code here below
>
> $ ipython -pylab
>
> In [1]: import numpy as np
>
> In [2]: theta = np.arange(0., 2., 1./180.)*np.pi
>
> In [3]: plt.polar(3*theta, theta/5)
>
> I obtain the attached images with 0.98.5.3 and 0.99.{0.1rc1} (didn't
> have time to test against SVN).
>
> AFAIUI, the 0.98.5.3 should be the correct behavior, so in 0.99.x
> there's a regression.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>
--
Michael Droettboom
Science Software Branch
Operations and Engineering Division
Space Telescope Science Institute
Operated by AURA for NASA
|
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2009-09-18 15:16:37
|
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Sandro Tosi <mat...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi all,
> with the simple code here below
>
> $ ipython -pylab
>
> In [1]: import numpy as np
>
> In [2]: theta = np.arange(0., 2., 1./180.)*np.pi
>
> In [3]: plt.polar(3*theta, theta/5)
>
> I obtain the attached images with 0.98.5.3 and 0.99.{0.1rc1} (didn't
> have time to test against SVN).
>
> AFAIUI, the 0.98.5.3 should be the correct behavior, so in 0.99.x
> there's a regression.
I filed a report at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=80706&atid=560720.
JDH
|
|
From: Sandro T. <mat...@gm...> - 2009-09-18 14:48:54
|
Hi all,
with the simple code here below
$ ipython -pylab
In [1]: import numpy as np
In [2]: theta = np.arange(0., 2., 1./180.)*np.pi
In [3]: plt.polar(3*theta, theta/5)
I obtain the attached images with 0.98.5.3 and 0.99.{0.1rc1} (didn't
have time to test against SVN).
AFAIUI, the 0.98.5.3 should be the correct behavior, so in 0.99.x
there's a regression.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
|
|
From: Gökhan S. <gok...@gm...> - 2009-09-18 04:14:31
|
Apparently usetex_demo.py and dannys_example.py are same (matplotlib/examples). The latter might be deleted if no reference exist for that file. -- Gökhan |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2009-09-18 02:51:57
|
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> I just happened to type getp(gca()) on matplotlib 0.99.0, and the output
> looks all garbled:
Fixed in r7780 (branch) and 7781 (trunk).
Eric
>
>>>> getp(gca())
> /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/axes.py:1269: DeprecationWarning: use ax.patch instead
> warnings.warn('use ax.patch instead', DeprecationWarning)
> stable = box
> a = 1.0
> or = C
> ated = False
> ct = auto
> scale_on = True
> scalex_on = True
> scaley_on = True
> = Axes(0.125,0.1;0.775x0.8)
> _locator = None
> _bgcolor = w
> [...]
>
> It's been a long time since I last tried this, but does anyone have an
> idea what changes could have caused this? Could it be related to the
> ReST formatting in the docstrings?
>
> Querying single attributes as in getp(gca(), 'yscale') seems to work
> fine, it's just this listing of all attributes that seems to be broken.
>
|