You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
(3) |
|
3
(5) |
4
(8) |
5
(1) |
6
(4) |
7
(8) |
8
(1) |
9
|
|
10
(9) |
11
(3) |
12
(5) |
13
(1) |
14
(13) |
15
|
16
(4) |
|
17
|
18
(1) |
19
(2) |
20
(4) |
21
(1) |
22
(6) |
23
(6) |
|
24
(4) |
25
(14) |
26
(2) |
27
|
28
(13) |
29
(1) |
30
(1) |
|
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Gökhan S. <gok...@gm...> - 2010-10-20 19:47:19
|
Hello, Please see the screenshot at http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1052/legendposition.png Although the visible difference is minor, I get slightly shifted legend positions on screen (and saving as png) and in pdf file. This required me to make manual adjustments (change axes vertical distance to position the legend) to look good on both screen and in the pdf. You can also see my ultra-fine precision legend positioning on these lines: f06leg = f06.legend((l1, l2), ("Air", "Dew Point"), loc='lower center', ncol=2, columnspacing=1.0,\ handletextpad=0.3, handlelength=2.3, bbox_to_anchor = (0.243, 0.785)) Using qt4agg and xpdf as pdfdistiller on rev8757. -- Gökhan |
|
From: Giovanni P. <g.p...@ru...> - 2010-10-20 14:44:24
|
I checked the data (I can't send it, sorry), and it seems that the problem is given by the presence of not-a-numbers in the array. In the workaraound version, the nan are at the end, and that solves the problem. Shouldn't fill_between get rid of the nans? ----- Start Original Message ----- Sent: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:03:36 -0500 From: John Hunter <jd...@gm...> To: g.p...@ru... Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] Bug (?) in fill_between > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Giovanni Plantageneto > <g.p...@ru...> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think I found a bug in the command fill_between(). > > If I try to make a fill_between plot on an x-axis that spans both negative and positive values (and only in that case), I have some funny results. > > I attach the code that gives the wrong result, the workaround I use, and their output. > > > Can you post a complete free-standing example that replicates the problem? ----- End Original Message ----- |
|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2010-10-20 14:04:03
|
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Giovanni Plantageneto <g.p...@ru...> wrote: > Hi, > > I think I found a bug in the command fill_between(). > If I try to make a fill_between plot on an x-axis that spans both negative and positive values (and only in that case), I have some funny results. > I attach the code that gives the wrong result, the workaround I use, and their output. Can you post a complete free-standing example that replicates the problem? |
|
From: Giovanni P. <g.p...@ru...> - 2010-10-20 13:44:01
|
Hi,
I think I found a bug in the command fill_between().
If I try to make a fill_between plot on an x-axis that spans both negative and positive values (and only in that case), I have some funny results.
I attach the code that gives the wrong result, the workaround I use, and their output.
Regards
figure()
fill_between(totime,vartotal-varstddv,vartotal+varstddv,color='blue',alpha=0.3)
savefig('wrong.png',format='png',dpi=150)
figure()
fill(np.concatenate((totime[::-1],totime)),np.concatenate((vartotal[::-1]-varstddv[::-1],vartotal+varstddv)),color='blue',alpha=0.25)
savefig('right.png',format='png',dpi=150)
|