You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(5) |
2
(2) |
3
(4) |
4
|
5
|
|
6
(4) |
7
(6) |
8
(7) |
9
(2) |
10
(8) |
11
(5) |
12
(3) |
|
13
(1) |
14
|
15
(11) |
16
(10) |
17
(3) |
18
(5) |
19
(6) |
|
20
(2) |
21
(2) |
22
(8) |
23
|
24
(2) |
25
(16) |
26
(37) |
|
27
(15) |
28
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Mike K. <mc...@gm...> - 2011-02-08 04:27:41
|
On 2/7/11 10:30 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > The behavior in gtk and other backends is the designed/intended > behavior. macosx backend is actually the odd-man out because it was > coded to only work in one of those modes. > > Maybe we should emit a warning when macosx backend is used when > interactive=False in order to dispel misunderstanding? possibly, but maybe adding a blurb about OSX, and maybe the blocking behavior to the documentation here: http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/shell.html and maybe to the dostrings of ion(), ioff() would be good. M |
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2011-02-08 03:30:44
|
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Mike Kaufman <mc...@gm...> wrote: > On 2/7/11 9:28 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > > >>> Which backend are you using and using which OS? > >> > >> Good question. Snow Leopard and the MacOSX backend. If I use the Gtk > > > > This is a known bug in the MacOSX backend. > > > >> backend this bug does _not_ occur (though I have to use the plt.show() > >> command to bring up the window --- which hangs the shell...) > > > > It should simply block until the window is closed; is this what you mean? > > Yes I do, although I'm not sure why it should block: I may want to add > additional plots to the window --- though I do notice that if > isinteractive=True, then the window doesn't block. It makes sense I > guess, but not really intuitive, especially not coming from the > behaviour of the OSX backend. > > M > > The behavior in gtk and other backends is the designed/intended behavior. macosx backend is actually the odd-man out because it was coded to only work in one of those modes. Maybe we should emit a warning when macosx backend is used when interactive=False in order to dispel misunderstanding? Ben Root |
|
From: Mike K. <mc...@gm...> - 2011-02-08 03:17:54
|
On 2/7/11 9:28 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >>> Which backend are you using and using which OS? >> >> Good question. Snow Leopard and the MacOSX backend. If I use the Gtk > > This is a known bug in the MacOSX backend. > >> backend this bug does _not_ occur (though I have to use the plt.show() >> command to bring up the window --- which hangs the shell...) > > It should simply block until the window is closed; is this what you mean? Yes I do, although I'm not sure why it should block: I may want to add additional plots to the window --- though I do notice that if isinteractive=True, then the window doesn't block. It makes sense I guess, but not really intuitive, especially not coming from the behaviour of the OSX backend. M |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2011-02-08 02:29:00
|
On 02/07/2011 04:13 PM, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> On 2/7/11 9:02 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Mike Kaufman<mc...@gm...
>> <mailto:mc...@gm...>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> using a recent svn (r8900), I've noticed that after starting from a
>> regular python shell:
>>
>> >>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>> >>> plt.isinteractive()
>> False
>> >>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,3,2])
>> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a090>]
>> >>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,2,3])
>> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a590>]
>> # plt.draw() is not required, the figure pops up
>> # and both plots are shown
>> >>> plt.xlim(1,2)
>> (1, 2)
>> # again this works immediately no draw() required
>> >>> plt.xlabel('aaa')
>> <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
>> # ditto, no draw() required
>>
>> but if the axes methods are used, then interactive status is honored:
>>
>> >>> plt.gca().set_xlabel('bbb')
>> <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
>> >>> plt.gca().plot([1,2,3],[3,2,1])
>> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7cf90>]
>> >>> plt.gca().set_xlim(1,3)
>> (1, 3)
>> # all these require a plt.draw() to show up...
>>
>> I think that this is a misfeature, but maybe this is desired behavior?
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>> Which backend are you using and using which OS?
>
> Good question. Snow Leopard and the MacOSX backend. If I use the Gtk
This is a known bug in the MacOSX backend.
> backend this bug does _not_ occur (though I have to use the plt.show()
> command to bring up the window --- which hangs the shell...)
It should simply block until the window is closed; is this what you mean?
Eric
>
> M
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
|
|
From: Mike K. <mc...@gm...> - 2011-02-08 02:14:07
|
On 2/7/11 9:02 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Mike Kaufman <mc...@gm...
> <mailto:mc...@gm...>> wrote:
>
>
> using a recent svn (r8900), I've noticed that after starting from a
> regular python shell:
>
> >>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
> >>> plt.isinteractive()
> False
> >>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,3,2])
> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a090>]
> >>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,2,3])
> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a590>]
> # plt.draw() is not required, the figure pops up
> # and both plots are shown
> >>> plt.xlim(1,2)
> (1, 2)
> # again this works immediately no draw() required
> >>> plt.xlabel('aaa')
> <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
> # ditto, no draw() required
>
> but if the axes methods are used, then interactive status is honored:
>
> >>> plt.gca().set_xlabel('bbb')
> <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
> >>> plt.gca().plot([1,2,3],[3,2,1])
> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7cf90>]
> >>> plt.gca().set_xlim(1,3)
> (1, 3)
> # all these require a plt.draw() to show up...
>
> I think that this is a misfeature, but maybe this is desired behavior?
>
> M
>
>
> Which backend are you using and using which OS?
Good question. Snow Leopard and the MacOSX backend. If I use the Gtk
backend this bug does _not_ occur (though I have to use the plt.show()
command to bring up the window --- which hangs the shell...)
M
|
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2011-02-08 02:02:58
|
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Mike Kaufman <mc...@gm...> wrote:
>
> using a recent svn (r8900), I've noticed that after starting from a
> regular python shell:
>
> >>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
> >>> plt.isinteractive()
> False
> >>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,3,2])
> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a090>]
> >>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,2,3])
> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a590>]
> # plt.draw() is not required, the figure pops up
> # and both plots are shown
> >>> plt.xlim(1,2)
> (1, 2)
> # again this works immediately no draw() required
> >>> plt.xlabel('aaa')
> <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
> # ditto, no draw() required
>
> but if the axes methods are used, then interactive status is honored:
>
> >>> plt.gca().set_xlabel('bbb')
> <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
> >>> plt.gca().plot([1,2,3],[3,2,1])
> [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7cf90>]
> >>> plt.gca().set_xlim(1,3)
> (1, 3)
> # all these require a plt.draw() to show up...
>
> I think that this is a misfeature, but maybe this is desired behavior?
>
> M
>
>
Which backend are you using and using which OS?
Ben Root
|
|
From: Mike K. <mc...@gm...> - 2011-02-08 01:20:32
|
using a recent svn (r8900), I've noticed that after starting from a
regular python shell:
>>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>>> plt.isinteractive()
False
>>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,3,2])
[<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a090>]
>>> plt.plot([1,2,3],[1,2,3])
[<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7a590>]
# plt.draw() is not required, the figure pops up
# and both plots are shown
>>> plt.xlim(1,2)
(1, 2)
# again this works immediately no draw() required
>>> plt.xlabel('aaa')
<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
# ditto, no draw() required
but if the axes methods are used, then interactive status is honored:
>>> plt.gca().set_xlabel('bbb')
<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x1033a2290>
>>> plt.gca().plot([1,2,3],[3,2,1])
[<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0x114e7cf90>]
>>> plt.gca().set_xlim(1,3)
(1, 3)
# all these require a plt.draw() to show up...
I think that this is a misfeature, but maybe this is desired behavior?
M
|