You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(8) |
2
(4) |
3
(21) |
4
(23) |
5
(3) |
|
6
|
7
(8) |
8
(2) |
9
|
10
(6) |
11
(4) |
12
(6) |
|
13
(1) |
14
(9) |
15
(10) |
16
(11) |
17
(3) |
18
(10) |
19
(9) |
|
20
(2) |
21
(10) |
22
(16) |
23
(8) |
24
(6) |
25
(6) |
26
(3) |
|
27
(5) |
28
(1) |
29
(14) |
30
(5) |
31
(14) |
|
|
|
From: PGM <pgm...@gm...> - 2006-08-25 21:00:29
|
Hola, Use the SVN version, it works pretty OK with 1.0b2 |
|
From: Flavio C. <fcc...@gm...> - 2006-08-25 20:52:28
|
hi
which is the latest version of numpy supported by matplotlib?
I recently updated to numpy 1.0b2 and I cant import pylab anymore.
part of the problem is this code of numerix.__init__.py:
elif which[0] =3D=3D "numpy":
try:
import numpy.oldnumeric as numpy
from numpy.oldnumeric import *
except ImportError:
import numpy
from numpy import *
from _sp_imports import nx, infinity
from _sp_imports import UInt8, UInt16, UInt32
Matrix =3D matrix
matrix is no longer present on numpy.oldnumeric, so... it breaks....
any hints?
--=20
Fl=E1vio Code=E7o Coelho
registered Linux user # 386432
---------------------------
"Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made."
Otto von Bismark
|
|
From: Derek H. <dh...@cs...> - 2006-08-25 09:14:23
|
Jouni=20
Wow! A guru at work... this solves all my current problems;
your insights and comments are most appreciated!
To return to my first post - matplotlib aims to make simple things
simple - I would argue that the way tickmarks are currently dealt
with is NOT simple & it would be great to see some simplifications
or additions to the interface to deal with the issues raised in this
thread (for example, by aligning their behaviour and properties to=20
other, similar, chart properties).
Thanks again,
Derek
>>> Jouni K Sepp=E4nen <jk...@ik...> 2006/08/23 08:52 AM >>>
[Again copying to matplotlib-users; maybe the main developers can=20=20
comment on whether these shortcomings in the getp/setp interface=20=20
should be fixed.]
Hi Derek,
> It does seem as those these settings affect the top and bottom of=20=20
> the graph - I was wondering if it was possible to show tickmarks=20=20
> along the bottom edge but not the top edge?
I don't think that's directly supported. Here's a hacky way to do it:
lines =3D getp(gca(), 'xticklines')
toplines =3D [ l for l in lines if getp(l, 'ydata') =3D=3D (1,) ]
setp(toplines, visible=3DFalse)
How I came up with this: I knew that I wanted to make some of the=20=20
xticklines invisible, so I looked at the list of line objects for=20=20
clues as to what differs between them. They seem to have xdata and=20=20
ydata properties, and ydata is (0,) for half of the lines and (1,)=20=20
for the other half, so it looks like it is the vertical position in=20=20
axis coordinates. (xdata seems to be in data coordinates.)
> And the other property I do not see on the list is the one that=20=20
> shows whether a tick goes "into" the graph or just "out" - in the=20=20
> prc file, there is a line:
> xtick.direction : in # direction: in or out
> but there is no "direction' property?
You're right, there is no obvious property to control this. Here's an=20=20
even hackier way to do this (and one that doesn't look very future-=20
proof):
for l in getp(gca(), 'xticklines'):
setp(l, 'marker', 5-getp(l, 'marker'))
The line objects have a marker property, which is 2 for some markers=20=20
and 3 for the others... so I guessed that one of them means upwards=20=20
and the other downwards, and checked this guess by flipping the=20=20
xtick.direction parameter and looking again. So subtracting the=20=20
marker from 5 flips the direction.
I wonder how this is done in Matlab?
> label: any string
>
> which shows me that the Yaxis has a label - in this case a
> string - but I do not see how one can set the font properties
> for the Yaxis label as it is not Text object??
I think you cannot do this with setp alone. Use the ylabel command:
ylabel('foo bar', fontsize=3D18)
--=20
Jouni
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easi=
er
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D1=
21642=20
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Mat...@li...=20
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
--=20
This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright, terms and conditions and
e-mail legal notice. Views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the
views of the CSIR.
=20
CSIR E-mail Legal Notice
http://mail.csir.co.za/CSIR_eMail_Legal_Notice.html=20
=20
CSIR Copyright, Terms and Conditions
http://mail.csir.co.za/CSIR_Copyright.html=20
=20
For electronic copies of the CSIR Copyright, Terms and Conditions and the C=
SIR
Legal Notice send a blank message with REQUEST LEGAL in the subject line to
Cal...@cs....
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScan=
ner,=20
and is believed to be clean.
|
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2006-08-25 07:55:42
|
Jordan Dawe wrote: > So I have a contourf plot and I am resetting the ylims so as to only > display a subset of the full contourf plot. Is there anyway to set norm > and the colorbar so they take their colormapping settings using the data > currently on display? By which I mean: the full dataset has a range of > 260-320. The reset axes limits display a region that only has values > between 280-310. I'd like the colormap to extend over this range of > values automatically, without having to set vmin=280, vmax=310. Any way > to do that? Jordan, I don't think so; and although I have not thought hard about it, my impression is that adding this capability would take a lot of work and redesign. I expect that in most cases what you describe would not be the desired behavior, so it would have to be a non-default option. Eric |
|
From: Michael F. <mp...@be...> - 2006-08-25 02:16:37
|
Hi all,
Sometime in the past couple months, there's been a change in SVN that's
causing me problems when trying to hide tick labels. I think the problem is
related to the get_xticklabels()/get_yticklabels() methods of the Axes class,
in that they only return a list consisting of a single tick label no matter
how many there should be. I'm encountering this problem in SVN rev. 2706.
Here is some example code:
from pylab import *
# set up a plot
x = arange(5)
ax = subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, x)
# hide the first tick label on the x axis
xtl = ax.get_xticklabels()
xtl[0].set_visible(False)
print len(xtl)
ax.set_xlabel('foo')
show()
For me, no x tick labels are drawn, and the length of xtl is one instead of
the expected 9.
Can anyone reproduce this?
Mike
|
|
From: Jordan D. <jd...@eo...> - 2006-08-25 00:13:15
|
So I have a contourf plot and I am resetting the ylims so as to only display a subset of the full contourf plot. Is there anyway to set norm and the colorbar so they take their colormapping settings using the data currently on display? By which I mean: the full dataset has a range of 260-320. The reset axes limits display a region that only has values between 280-310. I'd like the colormap to extend over this range of values automatically, without having to set vmin=280, vmax=310. Any way to do that? Jordan |