You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(9) |
2
(1) |
3
(4) |
4
(4) |
|
5
(9) |
6
(5) |
7
(12) |
8
(5) |
9
(27) |
10
(10) |
11
(4) |
|
12
|
13
(6) |
14
(12) |
15
(16) |
16
(13) |
17
(9) |
18
(1) |
|
19
(2) |
20
(4) |
21
(9) |
22
(5) |
23
(2) |
24
(6) |
25
|
|
26
(1) |
27
(9) |
28
(7) |
29
(2) |
30
(9) |
|
|
|
From: Daniel M. <dan...@go...> - 2011-06-28 20:55:57
|
> Yes, it is a known problem, and it is by design. However, the OP has a good > point that the gallary should have nice-looking plots. Therefore, it would > make sense to modify those really bad examples with subplot_adjust() to > allow them to look better. Very much agreed :) |
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2011-06-28 20:27:22
|
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Mader < dan...@go...> wrote: > Hi, > > this is a known problem when working with subplots, reducing the > figure size or increasing the font size. It is like that by design but > there are workarounds. > > > http://old.nabble.com/Feature-request%3A-automatic-scaling-of-subplots,-margins,-etc-td31556961.html > > http://old.nabble.com/faq%3A-reducing-figure.figsize-cuts-off-labels-and-tick-marks-td30984092.html > > Hope this helps :) > > Yes, it is a known problem, and it is by design. However, the OP has a good point that the gallary should have nice-looking plots. Therefore, it would make sense to modify those really bad examples with subplot_adjust() to allow them to look better. Ben Root |
|
From: Nat E. <nat...@gm...> - 2011-06-28 19:58:44
|
We started using Python 2.7.2 a week or two ago, and I'm now running into
this problem when attempting to build matplotlib 1.0.1 on several of our
machines:
basedirlist is: []
============================================================================
BUILDING MATPLOTLIB
matplotlib: 1.0.1
python: 2.7.2 (default_cci, Jun 28 2011, 12:34:28) [GCC
4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)]
platform: darwin
REQUIRED DEPENDENCIES
numpy: 1.5.1
freetype2: found, but unknown version (no pkg-config)
* WARNING: Could not find 'freetype2' headers in any
* of '.', './freetype2'.
OPTIONAL BACKEND DEPENDENCIES
libpng: found, but unknown version (no pkg-config)
* Could not find 'libpng' headers in any of '.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 162, in <module>
if check_for_tk() or (options['build_tkagg'] is True):
File
"/Volumes/Scratch1/nat/phenix_installer/build-source/mac-intel-osx/patchnose/tmp/matplotl
ib-1.0.1/setupext.py", line 832, in check_for_tk
(Tkinter.__version__.split()[-2], Tkinter.TkVersion,
Tkinter.TclVersion))
IndexError: list index out of range
When I run the version of Python that I'm using to build matplotlib, this is
what I'm seeing:
>>> import Tkinter
>>> Tkinter.__version__
'$Revision$'
I don't need or want Tkinter support either in Python or in matplotlib, but
it appears to be impossible to disable Tkinter when compiling Python. Is
there a way around this problem without patching the Python build, or
matplotlib, or both?
thanks,
Nat
|
|
From: Daniel M. <dan...@go...> - 2011-06-28 15:09:20
|
Hi, this is a known problem when working with subplots, reducing the figure size or increasing the font size. It is like that by design but there are workarounds. http://old.nabble.com/Feature-request%3A-automatic-scaling-of-subplots,-margins,-etc-td31556961.html http://old.nabble.com/faq%3A-reducing-figure.figsize-cuts-off-labels-and-tick-marks-td30984092.html Hope this helps :) 2011/6/28 Randolf Ebelt <eb...@ie...>: > Hi, > > the margins of all examples at > > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/gallery.html > > for example: > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/examples/api/collections_demo.html > > seem to be way to small! For me as a potential user its bad advertising :) > > Regards, > Randolf > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users |
|
From: Alex F. <ale...@gm...> - 2011-06-28 14:49:25
|
I'm using 0.99.3, which is from the ubuntu maverick repos. This comes up mostly when I'm drawing plots interactively from ipython. Cheers, Alex On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Alex Flint <ale...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I'm wondering whether there is an easy way to append an additional subplot >> to an existing figure without losing the subplots already drawn. >> >> Currently if I do something like >> >>> subplot(211); plot(...); subplot(212); plot(...); >> >> Then I get inconsistent drawing results if I try something like: >> >>> subplot(313); plot(...); >> >> Cheers, >> Alex >> >> > Yes, it is "possible", but it can be messy to do so. Also, which version > of matplotlib are you using? Is there a particular reason why you don't > know the number of plots ahead of time? > > Ben Root > > |
|
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2011-06-28 14:44:59
|
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Alex Flint <ale...@gm...> wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm wondering whether there is an easy way to append an additional subplot > to an existing figure without losing the subplots already drawn. > > Currently if I do something like > >>> subplot(211); plot(...); subplot(212); plot(...); > > Then I get inconsistent drawing results if I try something like: > >>> subplot(313); plot(...); > > Cheers, > Alex > > Yes, it is "possible", but it can be messy to do so. Also, which version of matplotlib are you using? Is there a particular reason why you don't know the number of plots ahead of time? Ben Root |
|
From: Randolf E. <eb...@ie...> - 2011-06-28 14:36:00
|
Hi, the margins of all examples at http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/gallery.html for example: http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/examples/api/collections_demo.html seem to be way to small! For me as a potential user its bad advertising :) Regards, Randolf |