You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(4) |
2
(3) |
3
(3) |
4
(5) |
5
(1) |
6
|
7
(5) |
|
8
(1) |
9
(3) |
10
(3) |
11
(15) |
12
(10) |
13
(2) |
14
|
|
15
|
16
(2) |
17
(3) |
18
|
19
|
20
(3) |
21
(1) |
|
22
(5) |
23
(5) |
24
|
25
(3) |
26
|
27
(1) |
28
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2004-02-03 21:42:15
|
>>>>> "Kuzminski," == Kuzminski, Stefan R <SKu...@fa...> writes:
Kuzminski> Some notes on compiling GD backend for windows. 1)
Kuzminski> _gdmodule.c needs to be modified in 2 places to
Kuzminski> compile on windows
Hi Stephan,
I've been following your instructions on building gdmodule and I've
gotten pretty far. I have a couple of questions for you.
Did you use the prebuilt gd (not gdmodule) or the dll supplied at the
web site. I built it myself, and when I try to build gdmodule, I get
errors like
_gdmodule.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _gdFontGiantRep
_gdmodule.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _gdFontLargeRep
The export to these symbols are dependent on the following
preprocessor options (from gd.h)
#ifdef BGDWIN32
#define BGD_EXPORT_DATA_IMPL __declspec(dllexport)
#else
#ifdef WIN32
#define BGD_EXPORT_DATA_IMPL __declspec(dllimport)
#else
/* 2.0.20: should be nothing at all */
#define BGD_EXPORT_DATA_IMPL
#endif /* WIN32 */
#endif /* BGDWIN32 */
In gdfontl.c, there is some code
BGD_EXPORT_DATA_IMPL gdFontPtr gdFontLarge = &gdFontLargeRep;
I set BGDWIN32 option when building the gd DLL, but I still don't seem
to get _gdFontLargeRep exported to the gd.dll. For example, if I grep
the dll for gdFontLarge, I see that symbol but not gdFontLargeRep.
Ditto for the prebuilt bgd.dll.
Did you encounter this problem and do you have any insights here?
Thanks,
John Hunter
|
|
From: Jean-Baptiste C. <Jea...@de...> - 2004-02-03 11:46:57
|
Hi ! I am using with delight the new object_picker tools as of version 0.42b It works fine but I can not find out how to draw the legend, labels, title,= etc... Neither the ax (Subplot), nor the fig (ArtistPickerFigure) have those metho= ds. How could I access them ? Thanks Kve=F0ja Jean-Baptiste --=20 ----------------------------- Jea...@de... Department of Statistics deCODE genetics Sturlugata,8 570 2993 101 Reykjav=EDk |
|
From: matthew a. <ma...@ca...> - 2004-02-03 03:04:59
|
Hi again,
I'm having more trouble with matplotlib ticks today. I wrote a little demo
script that illustrates some of the problems:
...
#!/usr/bin/python
from matplotlib.matlab import *
xx = arange(0.002, 0.0101, 0.001)
print xx
# an instance of yy = rand(9), so all values are between 0 and 1
yy = [ 5.94692328e-04, 1.62328354e-01, 7.56822907e-01, 2.28180047e-02,
3.23820274e-01, 3.93120900e-01, 6.41332889e-01, 1.22474302e-02,
5.03485402e-01]
subplot(211)
plot(xx, yy)
subplot(212)
plot(xx, yy)
autoaxis = axis()
print autoaxis
axis(autoaxis)
show()
...
* the x axis includes *two* 0.004 and *two* 0.008; this really worried me
until I realised it was a cosmetic rounding / significant figures issue,
however it's bad enough to be seriously misleading. I think the actual
tick values are something like 0.0036 and 0.0044 but are both rounded to
0.004.
* the data points lie *between* the x axis ticks, this is a side-effect of
the above
* the poor choice of tick positions on the y axis -- they should be
in round numbers like 0.2, 0.4, etc. The most significant varying figure
should be a multiple of 1, 2, or 5.
* the tick labels should all have the same number of significant figures,
e.g. 0.00, 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 0.60, ... for the y axis
* after manually setting the axis (lower subplot), the last point is not
plotted
I hope you find this feedback useful. I had a go at fixing it in axis.py,
but it's a) fiddly and b) I don't quite understand which part has
precendence when the axis changes during a zoom or pan. Getting the ticks
right depends on the correct bounds for the axis and the choice of
numticks. I noticed you have logic to clean up the bounds (vmin and vmax)
but not the ticklocs.
Thanks for matplotlib.
Cheers,
Matthew.
|