You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(9) |
2
(11) |
3
(2) |
|
4
|
5
(6) |
6
(1) |
7
(6) |
8
(7) |
9
(16) |
10
(6) |
|
11
(2) |
12
(13) |
13
(3) |
14
(6) |
15
(6) |
16
(19) |
17
(2) |
|
18
(1) |
19
(1) |
20
(11) |
21
(5) |
22
(4) |
23
(7) |
24
(14) |
|
25
(15) |
26
(27) |
27
(26) |
28
(7) |
29
(2) |
30
(7) |
|
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2007-11-30 18:29:35
|
José Gómez-Dans wrote:
> Hi,
> I have written a quick'n'dirty image segmentation algorithm. It seems to work
> fine. However, I am interested in getting contours of the segments
> (essentially, (x,y) pairs of the edges of each segment). I can plot the
> contours with MPL (pylab.contour()), but I'd like to have the locations of
> the edges, so that I can actually do something with them.
>
> Does anyone have any hints on how to go on about this?
cs = contour(Z)
for lev, col in zip(cs.levels, cs.collections):
s = col._segments
s will be a list of numpy arrays, each containing the (x,y) vertices
defining a contour line at level lev.
This illustrates a shortcoming of the contour and/or LineCollection
code; to get what I think you want, you have to use a private attribute,
_segments. It should be part of the public API. After some other changes
and reorganizations in mpl have settled down, I will fix this. Feel
free to send me a reminder in a month.
Eric
|
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2007-11-30 17:25:28
|
Peter I. Hansen wrote: > On Nov 30, 2007 4:58 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: >> Peter I. Hansen wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I'm typestting some graphs including a few axvspan's with eg. a >>> facecolor='0.6' . This looks very nice if I output a PNG, but when I >>> inculde this in my TeX document the axis labels dosn't scale. Then I >>> try to go the postscript way, and the the labels scale nicely but the >>> colored fields of axvspan prints as a coarse raster color. >> I assume you mean that the axvspan prints as a solid color, rather than >> semi-transparent (alpha-blended). That is an unfortunate limitation of >> the Postscript format -- it can not handle transparency. > > Yes, I'm using a solid color. > >>> Is there a best way of optimizing print quality? >> Each of the output formats has a number of different limitations -- it >> depends a lot on what you're rendering and where you need it to go. >> >> You could try saving as a PDF, and then using pdftex to generate your >> document, if that's an option for you. > > Unfortunately, saving directly as PDF does not work on my (Debian) > system. It gives a "NotImplementedError". I'm using version 0.90.1, > and maybe this will change for 0.91 . Can you please send the full traceback that accompanies this error? PDF should be working is general, but perhaps you are running into a specific feature of the PDF backend that is not working, and there may be a workaround (or 0.91 may work)... Cheers, Mike -- Michael Droettboom Science Software Branch Operations and Engineering Division Space Telescope Science Institute Operated by AURA for NASA |
|
From: Peter I. H. <pe...@gm...> - 2007-11-30 16:05:30
|
On Nov 30, 2007 4:58 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > Peter I. Hansen wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm typestting some graphs including a few axvspan's with eg. a > > facecolor='0.6' . This looks very nice if I output a PNG, but when I > > inculde this in my TeX document the axis labels dosn't scale. Then I > > try to go the postscript way, and the the labels scale nicely but the > > colored fields of axvspan prints as a coarse raster color. > > I assume you mean that the axvspan prints as a solid color, rather than > semi-transparent (alpha-blended). That is an unfortunate limitation of > the Postscript format -- it can not handle transparency. Yes, I'm using a solid color. > > Is there a best way of optimizing print quality? > > Each of the output formats has a number of different limitations -- it > depends a lot on what you're rendering and where you need it to go. > > You could try saving as a PDF, and then using pdftex to generate your > document, if that's an option for you. Unfortunately, saving directly as PDF does not work on my (Debian) system. It gives a "NotImplementedError". I'm using version 0.90.1, and maybe this will change for 0.91 . |
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2007-11-30 15:59:28
|
Peter I. Hansen wrote: > Hi > > I'm typestting some graphs including a few axvspan's with eg. a > facecolor='0.6' . This looks very nice if I output a PNG, but when I > inculde this in my TeX document the axis labels dosn't scale. Then I > try to go the postscript way, and the the labels scale nicely but the > colored fields of axvspan prints as a coarse raster color. I assume you mean that the axvspan prints as a solid color, rather than semi-transparent (alpha-blended). That is an unfortunate limitation of the Postscript format -- it can not handle transparency. > Is there a best way of optimizing print quality? Each of the output formats has a number of different limitations -- it depends a lot on what you're rendering and where you need it to go. You could try saving as a PDF, and then using pdftex to generate your document, if that's an option for you. Cheers, Mike -- Michael Droettboom Science Software Branch Operations and Engineering Division Space Telescope Science Institute Operated by AURA for NASA |
|
From: Peter I. H. <pe...@gm...> - 2007-11-30 15:46:47
|
Hi I'm typestting some graphs including a few axvspan's with eg. a facecolor='0.6' . This looks very nice if I output a PNG, but when I inculde this in my TeX document the axis labels dosn't scale. Then I try to go the postscript way, and the the labels scale nicely but the colored fields of axvspan prints as a coarse raster color. Is there a best way of optimizing print quality? -Peter |
|
From: <jgo...@gm...> - 2007-11-30 12:47:41
|
Hi, I have written a quick'n'dirty image segmentation algorithm. It seems to work fine. However, I am interested in getting contours of the segments (essentially, (x,y) pairs of the edges of each segment). I can plot the contours with MPL (pylab.contour()), but I'd like to have the locations of the edges, so that I can actually do something with them. Does anyone have any hints on how to go on about this? Thanks! Jose |
|
From: Stephen G. <ste...@op...> - 2007-11-30 04:30:23
|
I don't know if I dreamed it or was real, but I recall seeing somewhere that it was possible to add a control to the navigation bar, but now cannot seem to find any reference to this. Is is possible to add a control to the navigation bar? (I want to add a drop down box) I am using pyGtk, can add to somewhere else in my form, .. but it makes logical sense if it is on the navigation bar. Any suggestions? Thanks Steve |