Re: [Php-java-bridge-users] drop C implementation and rpm ? Call for rpm packagers.

Hi,

[we're not going to remove the C implementation nor
the RedHat packages...]

> I'm a php-java-bridge user, in windows environment
> and the performance 
> penalty is very relevant for our needs and so

Do you have any numbers? Even if the pure PHP
implementation is 5 times slower than the C
implementation on some operating systems (which I
believe isn't the case), other technologies are even
more expensive.

Isn't it possible to optmize the particular code block
so that the bridge can send an XML image to the back
end and/or to receive the result in one call?


> alocated some time 
> (without priority mind) to build the module into a
> windows dll.

The main problem with compiling a windows dll is that
it needs a proprietary tool. The pecl4win people have
the necessary infrastructure.

After 4.0.8 is released in June, we can think about
changing the license of the C implementation back to
PHP3 and donate the C code to the pecl maintainers (if
they want it).


Regards,
Jost Boekemeier



		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de