php-java-bridge-users Mailing List for PHP/Java Bridge

JAVA_SERVLET false is a new feature in Java.inc 5.5.2.

In earlier Java.inc versions you had to write a callback function
"java_get_default_channel()", please see the NEWS file for details.

On Sep 17, 2009 3:06 PM, <php...@li...>
wrote:

Ok cool, thanks I'll try the INET_LOCAL as well!

I think last time I tried INET_LOCAL I didn't also do
JAVA_SERVLET=false which probably is why it didn't work. I'd imagine
it affects the way the client tries to communicate with the back-end.

Alan

On Sep 17, 2009, at 8:56 AM, php-java-bridge-

us...@li... wrote: > [Please excuse the delay] > >> Easier
to handle is relative, n...
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart
> your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and
> stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register
> now&#33;
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf

> _______________________________________________ > php-java-bridge-users
mailing list

> php...@li...

> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/php-java-bridge-users-----------------------------...
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf

_______________________________________________ php-java-bridge-users
mailing list

php...@li...

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/php-java-bridge-users

Ok cool, thanks I'll try the INET_LOCAL as well!

I think last time I tried INET_LOCAL I didn't also do  
JAVA_SERVLET=false which probably is why it didn't work. I'd imagine  
it affects the way the client tries to communicate with the back-end.

Alan

On Sep 17, 2009, at 8:56 AM, php-java-bridge- 
us...@li... wrote:

> [Please excuse the delay]
>
>> Easier to handle is relative, no?
>
> May be. On Windows and Linux all you need to do is to start the  
> graphical
> software installer and install tomcat. After that it runs as a  
> standard
> system service.
>
>> Is it *bad* to run it standalone?
>
> Not at all. But it may not be as fast as a servlet back end with
> JAVA_PERSISTENT_SERVLET_CONNECTIONS set to true.
>
> The simple servlet engine built into JavaBridge.jar cannot handle  
> persistent
> connections (it uses http/1.0, not http/1.1). But the standalone  
> socket
> listener can use persistent connections:
>
> java -jar JavaBridge.jar INET_LOCAL:9267
>
> And in your php script or in java.inc set JAVA_HOSTS to  
> "127.0.0.1:9267" and
> JAVA_SERVLET to false.
>
> Regards,
> Jost Boekemeier
>
> On Sep 14, 2009 12:26 AM, <php-java-bridge- 
> us...@li...>
> wrote:
>
> Easier to handle is relative, no? I have -0- experience running Java
> App Servers. This is why I run it standalone; it is plenty fast, has
> been very reliable for me, and it's only 1 process to manage, so it's
> simple for me to understand. If a java app server has problems, I have
> no idea how to easily deal with it...
>
> Is it *bad* to run it standalone? What would I gain by switching?
>
> Alan
>
> On Sep 13, 2009, at 6:19 PM, php-java-bridge-
>
> us...@li... wrote: > There is one in the CVS attic.  
> > >
> However, Tomcat or JEE serv...
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart  
> your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and  
> stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register  
> now&#33;
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________
> php-java-bridge-users mailing list
> php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/php-java-bridge-users

[Please excuse the delay]

> Easier to handle is relative, no?

May be. On Windows and Linux all you need to do is to start the graphical
software installer and install tomcat. After that it runs as a standard
system service.

> Is it *bad* to run it standalone?

Not at all. But it may not be as fast as a servlet back end with
JAVA_PERSISTENT_SERVLET_CONNECTIONS set to true.

The simple servlet engine built into JavaBridge.jar cannot handle persistent
connections (it uses http/1.0, not http/1.1). But the standalone socket
listener can use persistent connections:

java -jar JavaBridge.jar INET_LOCAL:9267

And in your php script or in java.inc set JAVA_HOSTS to "127.0.0.1:9267" and
JAVA_SERVLET to false.

Regards,
Jost Boekemeier

On Sep 14, 2009 12:26 AM, <php...@li...>
wrote:

Easier to handle is relative, no? I have -0- experience running Java
App Servers. This is why I run it standalone; it is plenty fast, has
been very reliable for me, and it's only 1 process to manage, so it's
simple for me to understand. If a java app server has problems, I have
no idea how to easily deal with it...

Is it *bad* to run it standalone? What would I gain by switching?

Alan

On Sep 13, 2009, at 6:19 PM, php-java-bridge-

us...@li... wrote: > There is one in the CVS attic. > >
However, Tomcat or JEE serv...