You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(111) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(71) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(71) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(56) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(104) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(93) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(135) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(71) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(20) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(84) |
Jul
(38) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(18) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(10) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(3) |
3
|
4
|
5
(2) |
6
|
|
7
|
8
(6) |
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
(1) |
13
(3) |
|
14
|
15
(1) |
16
(1) |
17
(1) |
18
|
19
(5) |
20
(1) |
|
21
|
22
(1) |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
From: <php...@li...> - 2009-06-19 23:21:14
|
>> So then the "standalone" use is no longer >recommended or supported? > > It is still supported, of course. Please see our online docs for > details. Where, in the FAQ? > Example for the standalone container: > > java -Dphp.java.bridge.default_log_level=5 -jar JavaBridge.jar > SERVLET:8080 This looks different from the previous docs, which were like: > $JAVA -server -Xmx1200m -jar $JAVA_BRIDGE_PATH INET_LOCAL:9676 3 What is the final "3" for? And INET_LOCAL vs SERVLET? Are those java parameters, or arguments interpreted by the JavaBridge.jar executable? In any case is this form acceptable? > $JAVA -server -Xmx1200m -jar $JAVA_BRIDGE_PATH INET_LOCAL:9676 3 If so, this is the form we're having trouble with. The bridge seems to be hanging... the first few calls will work, then communication with the bridge becomes interrupted and hangs the web server and subsequent requests. Any idea where to look first for errors? Nothing in the output from the Jar... Thanks, Alan |
|
From: <php...@li...> - 2009-06-19 19:19:13
|
>So then the "standalone" use is no longer >recommended or supported? It is still supported, of course. Please see our online docs for details. > Ubuntu uses apt/dpkg as well. It installed fine.. May be. The question remains if it works, though. Please see the previous thread from our mailing list. Regards, Jost Boekemeier 19. Jun 2009 8:53 nachm. schrieb am < php...@li...>: > "Installation" is trivial, just download/install a servlet engine, > e.g. > http://tomcat.apache... So then the "standalone" use is no longer recommended or supported? java -jar JavaBridge.jar INET_LOCAL:9676 3 >> When setting up a new dev server (Ubuntu 8.04) we > decided to >> upgrade to > 5.4.4.2, and in... Ubuntu uses apt/dpkg as well. It installed fine... Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an ope... |
|
From: <php...@li...> - 2009-06-19 18:52:56
|
> "Installation" is trivial, just download/install a servlet engine, > e.g. > http://tomcat.apache.org and copy JavaBridge.war to its autodeploy > folder. > Please see php-java-bridge.sf.net for details. So then the "standalone" use is no longer recommended or supported? java -jar JavaBridge.jar INET_LOCAL:9676 3 >> When setting up a new dev server (Ubuntu 8.04) we > decided to >> upgrade to > 5.4.4.2, and installed the .deb > > As far as I know .deb packages are for debian, not ubuntu. Ubuntu uses apt/dpkg as well. It installed fine... Alan |
|
From: <php...@li...> - 2009-06-19 18:48:19
|
Hi, "Installation" is trivial, just download/install a servlet engine, e.g. http://tomcat.apache.org and copy JavaBridge.war to its autodeploy folder. Please see php-java-bridge.sf.net for details. > When setting up a new dev server (Ubuntu 8.04) we > decided to upgrade to 5.4.4.2, and installed the .deb As far as I know .deb packages are for debian, not ubuntu. Regards, Jost Boekemeier 19. Jun 2009 8:23 nachm. schrieb am < php...@li...>: I've been using php-java-bridge for over 3 years. It has performed flawlessly, but I haven't done much to the codebase until recently. When setting up a new dev server (Ubuntu 8.04), we decided to upgrade to 5.4.4.2, and installed the .deb. Unfortunately, we are running into serious problems and frankly I am very confused about the "proper" way to run the bridge for our situation; I am hoping you can offer some advice. Our 3.x production setup is very simple; we have the java.so module in php, and we use a standalone java server on JVM 1.5.0_09: $JAVA -server -Xmx1200m -jar /path/to/JavaBridge.jar INET_LOCAL:9676 3 So, to set up on the Ubuntu box, we installed the deb package. This was pretty confusing since the docs say don't use java.so anymore but it's in the deb package. I will submit that I didn't read the .deb relnotes until just now that say "don't use the deb package". Kindof a weird thing, but OK. FWIW, from the .deb install, we did turn off the java.so and use the require 'Java.inc' method, but we had 2 problems with this: 1. It didn't work with Java 1.6; we had to use Java 1.5 (that may be due to the other jars we are running). Also, although it worked perfectly from php CLI, when run from mod_php it was very unreliable and kept crashing. You could see from the debug log that it would communicate some, but then it would just hang and become unresponsive, to the point that it somehow actually hosed up apache. So what *is* the right way to run the bridge then? Is all I need now is the "JavaBridge.jar" and just run it like I was before, but from php just include Java.inc rather than use the java.so functions? Which download should I grab to get the appropriate JavaBridge.jar? The latest binary package just has a .war file? Or am I crazy to be using the standalone jar? Please advise, I am thoroughly confused! Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ php-java-bridge-users mailing list php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/php-java-bridge-users |
|
From: <php...@li...> - 2009-06-19 18:22:57
|
I've been using php-java-bridge for over 3 years. It has performed flawlessly, but I haven't done much to the codebase until recently. When setting up a new dev server (Ubuntu 8.04), we decided to upgrade to 5.4.4.2, and installed the .deb. Unfortunately, we are running into serious problems and frankly I am very confused about the "proper" way to run the bridge for our situation; I am hoping you can offer some advice. Our 3.x production setup is very simple; we have the java.so module in php, and we use a standalone java server on JVM 1.5.0_09: $JAVA -server -Xmx1200m -jar /path/to/JavaBridge.jar INET_LOCAL:9676 3 So, to set up on the Ubuntu box, we installed the deb package. This was pretty confusing since the docs say don't use java.so anymore but it's in the deb package. I will submit that I didn't read the .deb relnotes until just now that say "don't use the deb package". Kindof a weird thing, but OK. FWIW, from the .deb install, we did turn off the java.so and use the require 'Java.inc' method, but we had 2 problems with this: 1. It didn't work with Java 1.6; we had to use Java 1.5 (that may be due to the other jars we are running). Also, although it worked perfectly from php CLI, when run from mod_php it was very unreliable and kept crashing. You could see from the debug log that it would communicate some, but then it would just hang and become unresponsive, to the point that it somehow actually hosed up apache. So what *is* the right way to run the bridge then? Is all I need now is the "JavaBridge.jar" and just run it like I was before, but from php just include Java.inc rather than use the java.so functions? Which download should I grab to get the appropriate JavaBridge.jar? The latest binary package just has a .war file? Or am I crazy to be using the standalone jar? Please advise, I am thoroughly confused! Alan |