Apache Ignite vs. GridDB vs. ObjectBox vs. SQL Server Data Access Components Comparison Chart

Use Ignite as a traditional SQL database by leveraging JDBC drivers, ODBC drivers, or the native SQL APIs that are available for Java, C#, C++, Python, and other programming languages. Seamlessly join, group, aggregate, and order your distributed in-memory and on-disk data. Accelerate your existing applications by 100x using Ignite as an in-memory cache or in-memory data grid that is deployed over one or more external databases. Think of a cache that you can query with SQL, transact, and compute on. Build modern applications that support transactional and analytical workloads by using Ignite as a database that scales beyond the available memory capacity. Ignite allocates memory for your hot data and goes to disk whenever applications query cold records. Execute kilobyte-size custom code over petabytes of data. Turn your Ignite database into a distributed supercomputer for low-latency calculations, complex analytics, and machine learning.

The superfast nosql database for mobile and iot with integrated data synchronization. High-performance Objectbox is 10x faster than any alternative, improving response rates and enabling real-time applications. Check out our benchmarks. From sensor to server and everything in between. We support linux, windows, mac/ios, android, raspbian, etc. Embedded or containerized. Sync data seamlessly. Objectbox’ out-of-the-box synchronization makes data available when needed where needed, so you can take your app live faster. Offline first Develop applications that work on- and offline, independently from a constant internet connection, providing an “always-on”-feeling. Save time & dev. resources. Accelerate time-to-market, save development and lifecycle costs, save precious developer time for tasks that bring value, and let objectbox deal with the risk. Objectbox reduces cloud costs up to 60% by persisting data locally (on the edge), and syncing necessary data quicker and more efficiently.