Dotfuscator vs. JSDefender vs. Unlambda vs. Vue.js Comparison Chart

Application development teams face an ever-growing set of security threats as apps become more central to business and attackers grow in sophistication. These days, intellectual property theft is just the beginning – apps are also gateways to trade secret theft, customer/user data theft, and to identifying further attack vectors. Breaches in any of these areas can cause serious revenue, reputation, and brand damage. Sophisticated app dev organizations know that investing in app protection is good risk management. Basic renaming obfuscation isn’t enough. PreEmptive Protection Dotfuscator for .NET provides many layers of protection: multiple forms of obfuscation (renaming, string encryption, control flow, and more) plus active runtime checks (tamper, debug, root, and more). But it’s not just about protection – we design and test all these layers to be sure that they won’t break your app as the runtime platform evolves.

Unlambda is a programming language. Nothing remarkable there. The originality of Unlambda is that it stands as the unexpected intersection of two marginal families of languages. Functional programming languages, of which the canonical representative is Scheme (a Lisp dialect). This means that the basic object manipulated by the language (and indeed the only one as far as Unlambda is concerned) is the function. Rather, Unlambda uses a functional approach to programming: the only form of objects it manipulates are functions. Each function takes a function as an argument and returns a function. Apart from a binary “apply” operation, Unlambda provides several built-in functions (the most important ones being the K and S combinators). User-defined functions can be created, but not saved or named, because Unlambda does not have any variables.