AWS CodeArtifact vs. PackageManagement (OneGet) vs. Unlambda vs. dbForge Data Compare for MySQL Comparison Chart

Store and share artifacts across accounts, with appropriate levels of access granted to your teams and build systems. Reduce overhead from setup and maintenance of an artifact server or infrastructure with a fully managed service. Only pay for software packages stored, number of requests made, and data transferred out of Region with pay-as-you-go pricing. Configure CodeArtifact to fetch from public repositories such as the npm Registry, Maven Central, Python Package Index (PyPI), and NuGet. Securely share private packages across organizations by publishing them to a central organizational repository. Build automated approval workflows with CodeArtifact APIs and Amazon EventBridge, with visibility into your packages using AWS CloudTrail. Pull dependencies from CodeArtifact in AWS CodeBuild and publish new versions of your private packages secured with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM).

Unlambda is a programming language. Nothing remarkable there. The originality of Unlambda is that it stands as the unexpected intersection of two marginal families of languages. Functional programming languages, of which the canonical representative is Scheme (a Lisp dialect). This means that the basic object manipulated by the language (and indeed the only one as far as Unlambda is concerned) is the function. Rather, Unlambda uses a functional approach to programming: the only form of objects it manipulates are functions. Each function takes a function as an argument and returns a function. Apart from a binary “apply” operation, Unlambda provides several built-in functions (the most important ones being the K and S combinators). User-defined functions can be created, but not saved or named, because Unlambda does not have any variables.