5

Consider a simple class:

class SimpleClass {
    int a;
public:
    SimpleClass():a(0){}
    SimpleClass(int n):a(n){}
    // other functions
};

SimpleClass *p1, *p2;

p1 = new SimpleClass[5];

p2 = new SimpleClass(3);

In this case the default constructor SimpleClass() gets called for the construction of newly allocated objects for p1 and the parameterized constructor for p2. My question is: Is it possible to allocate an array and use the parameterized constructor using the new operator? For example, if I want the array to be initialized with objects having variable a value being 10, 12, 15, ... respectively, is it possible to pass these values when using the new operator?

I know that using stl vector is a better idea to deal with arrays of objects. I want to know whether the above is possible using new to allocate an array.

1
  • 1
    You could use an initializer list, though it doesn't scale all that well. With a vector, it's just a size+value constructor. Commented Mar 11, 2013 at 5:58

2 Answers 2

7

You could use placement-new as:

typedef std::aligned_storage<sizeof(SimpleClass), 
                             std::alignment_of<SimpleClass>::value
                             >::type storage_type;

//first get the aligned uninitialized memory!
SimpleClass *p1 = reinterpret_cast<SimpleClass*>(new storage_type[N]);

//then use placement new to construct the objects
for(size_t i = 0; i < N ; i++)
     new (p1+i) SimpleClass(i * 10);

In this example, I'm passing (i * 10) to the constructor of SampleClass.

Hope that helps.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

I get the following error test.cpp:16: error: expected initializer before ‘<’ token where 16 is the typedef line
@uba: #include <type_traits> and compile it in C++11 mode.
1

This is one way but it's not exactly what you achieve by new SimpleClass[5] because it creates an array of pointers instead of an array of values:

SimpleClass *p[] = {
    new SimpleClass(10), 
    new SimpleClass(12), 
    new SimpleClass(15)
};

To achieve what you want, I'd recommend code similar to this:

SimpleClass *p2 = new SimpleClass[3];
SimpleClass *pp = p2;
*pp = 10;
*++pp = 12;
*++pp = 15;

It's not ideal because it will create temporary objects on the stack and call assignment operator but it looks clean from the code perspective. Performance is sacrificed here a little bit.

10 Comments

It's still very possible with the existing code: p1 = new SimpleClass[5]{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
Yeah, right. I am actually creating an array of pointers also.
@chris, hang on, your code doesn't compile. error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before '{'
@evpo, Ah, looks like it's a C++11 feature. It definitely calls the appropriate constructor five times, though.
|

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.