Explain the use of ISynchronizeInvoke in cross thread invocation in .NET?
1 Answer
It's just an interface which contains appropriate methods to:
- Check whether special handling is required (
InvokeRequired) - Invoke a delegate safely from a different thread, blocking until the action is completed (
Invoke) - Invoke a delegate safely from a different thread, returning immediately without blocking (
BeginInvokewhich can be coupled withEndInvoketo retrieve the result later)
The most commonly known implementation is Control in Windows Forms.
Basically the problem is that it's not safe to access UI elements within arbitrary threads. These mechanisms allow calls to be marshalled between threads relatively easily. By only tying yourself to ISynchronizeInvoke instead of Control, you can avoid business classes from being tightly coupled to the UI.
EDIT: Stephen's comment from below is worth repeating here:
It's important to note that
ISynchronizeInvokeis outdated. TheSynchronizationContextabstraction is more universal.Controlis not just the most commonly known implementation; it's the only Microsoft one.
4 Comments
ISynchronizeInvoke is outdated. The SynchronizationContext abstraction is more universal. Control is not just the most commonly known implementation; it's the only Microsoft one.SynchronizationContext, which was added in .NET 2.0. It's similar to ISynchronizeInvoke, but done in a way that also supports ASP.NET asynchronous pages. Then when WPF/Silverlight came along in .NET 3, they only supported SynchronizationContext and not ISynchronizeInvoke. So I would recommend using SynchronizationContext instead of ISynchronizeInvoke as far back as 2.0.