Mapping interface instead of class to Database Table

Question

Is this possible? how?

As far as you know to mapping a class to db table we should be use TableAttribute(Name="tableName") attribute, so we can't use attributes on interfaces. If I don't use this attribute:

"The type 'interfaceName' is not mapped as a Table."

showed.

This is where EF4 knocks down L2SQL. You can map tables to abtract classes, and it fully supports inheritance. Entity Framework 4 FTW. — RPM1984
– RPM1984, Commented Sep 7, 2010 at 22:15
i think you're misunderstood my question! i want to map database tables to interfaces! no classes — Sadegh
– Sadegh, Commented Sep 7, 2010 at 22:29

Leniel Maccaferri · Accepted Answer · 2010-09-07 22:10:18Z

3

This is not possible.

Refer to TableAttribute Class on MSDN.

TableAttribute - Designates a class as an entity class that is associated with a database table.

answered Sep 7, 2010 at 22:10

Leniel Maccaferri

103k48 gold badges381 silver badges495 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Mapping interface instead of class to Database Table

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related