3

How can I use a for-comprehension that returns something I can assign to an ordered Map? This is a simplification of the code I have:

class Bar
class Foo(val name: String, val bar: Bar)
val myList: java.util.List[Foo] = ...
val result: ListMap[String, Bar] =
    for {
        foo <- myList
    } yield (foo.name, foo.bar)

I need to make sure my result is an ordered Map, in the order tuples are returned from the for-comprehension.

With the above, I get the error:

error: type mismatch;
found   : scala.collection.mutable.Buffer[(String,Bar)]
required: scala.collection.immutable.ListMap[String,Bar]
foo <- myList

This compiles:

class Bar
class Foo(val name: String, val bar: Bar)
val myList: java.util.List[Foo] = ...
val result: Predef.Map[String, Bar] =
    {
        for {
            foo <- myList
        } yield (foo.name, foo.bar)
    } toMap

but then I assume the map won't be ordered, and I need an explicit toMap call.

How can I achieve this?

2 Answers 2

7

The collection.breakOut is your good friend in such a case,

val result: collection.immutable.ListMap[String, Bar] = 
  myList.map{ foo => (foo.name, foo.bar) }(collection.breakOut)

If it is important to use for-comprehension expression, it will be done as follows,

val result: collection.immutable.ListMap[String, Bar] = {
  for { foo <- myList } yield (foo.name, foo.bar)
}.map(identity)(collection.breakOut)

Scala 2.8 breakOut has explained collection.breakOut very well.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

I tried with and without .map(identity) and both seem to compile fine. Is there a difference between using .map(identity) or not?
In the first case, ListMap will be generated from myList directly, but the latter will generate a seq from myList and then generate ListMap from it.
4

You can achieve do it by using the companion object of ListMap class as followings:

class Bar
class Foo(val name: String, val bar: Bar)
val myList: java.util.List[Foo] = ...
val result = ListMap((for(foo <- myList) yield (foo.name, foo.bar)):_*)

2 Comments

Could you please explain what the appending :_* means?
I case you never figured it out; It's just special syntax for saying "insert this stuff into a method that takes vargs", i.e. public void foo(String ...)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.