2

i was experimenting with cProfile for profiling python applications.so i wrote a simple script and below is the results that i have.

def foo():
  for i in range(100000):
    print i

def bar():
  for i in range(100):
    print "bar"*i

foo()
bar()

When i run the above script as python -m profile script.py i get this output:

         7 function calls in 0.136 seconds

   Ordered by: standard name

   ncalls  tottime  percall  cumtime  percall filename:lineno(function)
        2    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 :0(range)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 :0(setprofile)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.136    0.136 lip.py:1(<module>)
        1    0.136    0.136    0.136    0.136 lip.py:1(foo)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 lip.py:5(bar)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.136    0.136 profile:0(<code object <module> at 0x7fae5a978a30, file "lip.py", line 1>)
        0    0.000             0.000          profile:0(profiler)

but from the ouptut is seems only method foo consumed 0.136 s to excute while it was 0.00 s for method bar. why is that?

1 Answer 1

2

You are doing 1000x more work in foo than in bar.

Assuming they had the same speed, 0.136 / 1000 = 0.000136 which is too small of a number for this display, and bar()'s time just rounds to 0.00.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.