diff options
| author | Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io> | 2025-09-08 11:53:20 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io> | 2025-09-09 14:35:39 +0200 |
| commit | e6ddf72279a36c25a83ea057698345e15e18c04c (patch) | |
| tree | 1289237d50de2d2297c04dc61f754e9f1946672e /src/concurrent/qtconcurrentrun.cpp | |
| parent | a3572dd5e8a27e6c308255ddcf05de4dc9036cdd (diff) | |
Respect QT_NO_INT128 in qtypes.cpp's #error
We currently don't support building Qt with GCC and -ansi (or
-std=c++NN as opposed to -std=gnu++NN), because in that mode, the
language still recognizes __int128_t, but the C++ standard library
does not, leading to bloopers such as std::is_integral_v<__int128_t>
== false or std::is_signed_v<__int128_t> == false, or simply
std::numerical_limits<__int128_t> not being properly specialized.
But we do have QT_NO_INT128, which, when defined, disabled all the Qt
extended integer support.
A user requested to allow compiling with -ansi again, to which I
responded that they should define QT_NO_INT128 then, too, but of
course, the sanity-check in qtypes.cpp ignored QT_NO_INT128 and would
fire nonetheless, so this patch fixes that.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Made it possible to compile Qt with GCC in strict
C++ mode (-ansi or -std=c++NN) again, provided QT_NO_INT128 is
defined, too.
Amends 30e04340dac26ebd09f9bc8ceb598e873ab63ba7.
Pick-to: 6.10 6.9 6.8
Task-number: QTBUG-139280
Change-Id: I3e05d1f5e11b6a0a6a49fad53846f2b9cf0663a7
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/concurrent/qtconcurrentrun.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
