0
$\begingroup$

In the book of Papadimitriou. Combinatorial optimization, there is the instance of Linear Programming (LP) s.t. \begin{equation} \begin{split} &{\rm minimize:\;} c_1x_1 + c_2x_2 + c_3x_3,\\ &{\rm subect\; to:\; }x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 2 \end{split} \end{equation} The authors argue that the minimum is found at the corners of the 3d triangle (see figure) $v_1,v_2,v_3$.enter image description here

I have a couple of questions:

  1. If the $c_i$'s are all positive, then the minimum of the cost function is simply $2c_k$, where $0\leq c_k\leq c_j \leq c_i$, right?

  2. If for instance two $c_i$'s are negative, then one has to pick the two $x_i$'s that multiply them, s.t. $x_i+x_j = 2$, right? In this case, it cannot be that only $v_1,$v_2$ or $v_3$ are the only solutions to the LP program.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Presumably, the additional assumption is that all $x_j$ are non-negative, right?

  1. Yes. The minimum is always $2 \min_j c_j$. This is always true, even if some $c_i$'s are negative.
  2. If two $c_i$'s are negative, one of them is still smaller and you can pick the corresponding $x_i$ to be equal to $2$ (and all others to $0$).
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.