I'm trying to understand a paper (Tandem Networks of Universal Cells, Butler, 1978 1), but I can't make it past the first paragraph:
Consider the $x_l … x_{k - 1} | x_k$ partition matrix of a function $f( x_1, x_2, …, x_k)$, as shown in Fig. 1, where $C_0$ and $C_1$ represent the $x_k = 0$ and $x_k = 1$ columns, respectively. Let $0$ and $1$ represent the columns of all 0's and all 1's, respectively. Let $X$ denote a column with at least one 0 and at least one 1, and $\overline{X}$ its complement. The concatenation of two columns will represent a complete partition matrix. Thus, for example, $01$ represents $f(x_1, x_2, …, x_k) = x_k$ and $XX$ represents a function independent of $x_k$, but dependent on at least one of the remaining variables.
I'm trying to build something like a Karnaugh map, but the result I'm getting doesn't make sense.
For example, here's what I made from $f = x_1 \times x_2 \times x_3$ (with digital logic "&" for boolean times):

The first column ($C_0$) I would call $0$, from the author's definition, but the second column ($C_1$) doesn't seem to be a $0$, $1$, or $X$. What am I doing wrong?