aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/t/chainlint/for-loop.expect
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>2024-09-10 00:10:12 -0400
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2024-09-10 10:01:40 -0700
commite44f15ba3ee873b5df5e8e5d8cc018df288472ef (patch)
tree8718076d76999f67df5c99c70f6a211709976c45 /t/chainlint/for-loop.expect
parent588ef84ecef2c9782598529ba6511d4cb72ec158 (diff)
downloadgit-e44f15ba3ee873b5df5e8e5d8cc018df288472ef.tar.gz
chainlint: make error messages self-explanatory
The annotations emitted by chainlint to indicate detected problems are overly terse, so much so that developers new to the project -- those who should most benefit from the linting -- may find them baffling. For instance, although the author of chainlint and seasoned Git developers may understand that "?!AMP?!" is an abbreviation of "ampersand" and indicates a break in the &&-chain, this may not be obvious to newcomers. The "?!LOOP?!" case is particularly serious because that terse single word does nothing to convey that the loop body should end with "|| return 1" (or "|| exit 1" in a subshell) to ensure that a failing command in the body aborts the loop immediately. Moreover, unlike &&-chaining which is ubiquitous in Git tests, the "|| return 1" idiom is relatively infrequent, thus may be harder for a newcomer to discover by consulting nearby code. Address these shortcomings by emitting human-readable messages which both explain the problem and give a strong hint about how to correct it. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/chainlint/for-loop.expect')
-rw-r--r--t/chainlint/for-loop.expect8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/t/chainlint/for-loop.expect b/t/chainlint/for-loop.expect
index 908aeedf96..5029eacce3 100644
--- a/t/chainlint/for-loop.expect
+++ b/t/chainlint/for-loop.expect
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
2 (
3 for i in a b c
4 do
-5 echo $i ?!AMP?!
-6 cat <<-\EOF ?!LOOP?!
+5 echo $i ?!LINT: missing '&&'?!
+6 cat <<-\EOF ?!LINT: missing '|| exit 1'?!
7 bar
8 EOF
-9 done ?!AMP?!
+9 done ?!LINT: missing '&&'?!
10
11 for i in a b c; do
12 echo $i &&
-13 cat $i ?!LOOP?!
+13 cat $i ?!LINT: missing '|| exit 1'?!
14 done
15 )