diff options
| author | Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> | 2024-09-10 00:10:12 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2024-09-10 10:01:40 -0700 |
| commit | e44f15ba3ee873b5df5e8e5d8cc018df288472ef (patch) | |
| tree | 8718076d76999f67df5c99c70f6a211709976c45 /t/chainlint/while-loop.expect | |
| parent | 588ef84ecef2c9782598529ba6511d4cb72ec158 (diff) | |
| download | git-e44f15ba3ee873b5df5e8e5d8cc018df288472ef.tar.gz | |
chainlint: make error messages self-explanatory
The annotations emitted by chainlint to indicate detected problems are
overly terse, so much so that developers new to the project -- those who
should most benefit from the linting -- may find them baffling. For
instance, although the author of chainlint and seasoned Git developers
may understand that "?!AMP?!" is an abbreviation of "ampersand" and
indicates a break in the &&-chain, this may not be obvious to newcomers.
The "?!LOOP?!" case is particularly serious because that terse single
word does nothing to convey that the loop body should end with
"|| return 1" (or "|| exit 1" in a subshell) to ensure that a failing
command in the body aborts the loop immediately. Moreover, unlike
&&-chaining which is ubiquitous in Git tests, the "|| return 1" idiom is
relatively infrequent, thus may be harder for a newcomer to discover by
consulting nearby code.
Address these shortcomings by emitting human-readable messages which
both explain the problem and give a strong hint about how to correct it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/chainlint/while-loop.expect')
| -rw-r--r-- | t/chainlint/while-loop.expect | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/t/chainlint/while-loop.expect b/t/chainlint/while-loop.expect index 5ffabd5a93..2ba5582165 100644 --- a/t/chainlint/while-loop.expect +++ b/t/chainlint/while-loop.expect @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ 2 ( 3 while true 4 do -5 echo foo ?!AMP?! -6 cat <<-\EOF ?!LOOP?! +5 echo foo ?!LINT: missing '&&'?! +6 cat <<-\EOF ?!LINT: missing '|| exit 1'?! 7 bar 8 EOF -9 done ?!AMP?! +9 done ?!LINT: missing '&&'?! 10 11 while true; do 12 echo foo && -13 cat bar ?!LOOP?! +13 cat bar ?!LINT: missing '|| exit 1'?! 14 done 15 ) |