aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/contrib/examples/git-repack.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-03-26Remove contrib/examples/*Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-194/+0
There were some side discussions at Git Merge this year about how we should just update the README to tell users they can dig these up from the history if the need them, do that. Looking at the "git log" for this directory we get quite a bit more patch churn than we should here, mainly from things fixing various tree-wide issues. There's also confusion on the list occasionally about how these should be treated, "Re: [PATCH 1/4] stash: convert apply to builtin" (<CA+CzEk9QpmHK_TSBwQfEedNqrcVSBp3xY7bdv1YA_KxePiFeXw@mail.gmail.com>) being the latest example of that. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-27contrib/examples/git-repack.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command ↵Elia Pinto1-2/+2
substitution The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`. The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character. The patch was generated by: for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh") do perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}" done and then carefully proof-read. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-09contrib/examples/git-repack.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>"Elia Pinto1-2/+2
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern shells, the reason to avoid "test <cond> && test <cond>" spawning one extra process by using a single "test <cond> -a <cond>" no longer exists. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-17git-repack.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitutionElia Pinto1-1/+1
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`. The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character. The patch was generated by: for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh") do sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f} done and then carefully proof-read. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-17repack: rewrite the shell script in CStefan Beller1-0/+194
The motivation of this patch is to get closer to a goal of being able to have a core subset of git functionality built in to git. That would mean * people on Windows could get a copy of at least the core parts of Git without having to install a Unix-style shell * people using git in on servers with chrooted environments do not need to worry about standard tools lacking for shell scripts. This patch is meant to be mostly a literal translation of the git-repack script; the intent is that later patches would start using more library facilities, but this patch is meant to be as close to a no-op as possible so it doesn't do that kind of thing. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>