Skip to content

[basic.fundamental] Clarify unspecified representation #5087

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[basic.fundamental] Clarify unspecified representation #5087

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Nov 4, 2021

Fixes #4893

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Nov 4, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

jensmaurer commented Nov 4, 2021

CWG should have a look: https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2021/CoreWorkingGroup

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2022
Open
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 12, 2023

CWG meeting consensus Nov 11: this should become a CWG issue.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe added the not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking. label Nov 12, 2023
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

jensmaurer commented Nov 22, 2023

CWG2827

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels

cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[basic.fundamental] Unsigned integral type representation is neither unspecified nor implementation-defined CWG2827

2 participants

@jensmaurer @tkoeppe