Skip to content

Conversation

@chikamichi
Copy link

Hi,

Removing the @public tag in the comparative example could make sense as it would demonstrate the implicit access (that is, public).

What do you think about that change?

@hegemonic
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the suggestion. I'd prefer to keep the example as-is, since it shows a valid use of the @public tag.

(Also, the current page for the @access tag is not quite correct--in JSDoc 3.3.0, using the @public tag is a little different from omitting the tag. I need to update this page to make that clear. Thanks for helping me figure this out!)

@hegemonic hegemonic closed this Feb 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants