Skip to content

Conversation

@youennf
Copy link
Collaborator

@youennf youennf commented Apr 30, 2025

Following on last WebRTC WG meeting and this week's chair meeting, here is a draft of how SFrame packetization could be integrated with SFrameTransform and RTCRtpScriptTransform.


Preview | Diff

@youennf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

youennf commented Apr 30, 2025

@jan-ivar, @guidou, @dontcallmedom, here is the PR based on yesterday's meeting.

@youennf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

youennf commented Apr 30, 2025

@alvestrand, this also introduces the type attribute mentioned during last WebRTC WG meeting.

@youennf youennf force-pushed the sframe-packetization-integration branch from f580cb7 to 4f74b13 Compare April 30, 2025 10:42
@youennf youennf force-pushed the sframe-packetization-integration branch 2 times, most recently from 6226b9a to 17e6cf2 Compare May 22, 2025 11:58
@jan-ivar jan-ivar marked this pull request as draft June 5, 2025 14:21
@alvestrand
Copy link
Collaborator

At some point this needs to refer to how SDP negotiation of SFrame connects to it - hopefully that will be simple once the IETF agrees on the SFRAME RTP spec.

@youennf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

youennf commented Jun 6, 2025

At some point this needs to refer to how SDP negotiation of SFrame connects to it - hopefully that will be simple once the IETF agrees on the SFRAME RTP spec.

Agreed, plan is to discuss this at next AVTCore meeting, on Tuesday next week. I hope to see you there.

@jan-ivar
Copy link
Member

Sorry I approved the wrong PR.

@jan-ivar jan-ivar self-requested a review July 31, 2025 14:41
Introduce RTCRtpScriptTransformType with "sframe" value.
@youennf youennf force-pushed the sframe-packetization-integration branch from 17e6cf2 to c493da4 Compare November 17, 2025 15:26
@youennf youennf marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2025 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants