I don't know if my mind just fools me or this is really not working.
I need different type of Logging-classes so I created a abstract-class, the only definition that all classes will have the same is the way the writeToLog is handled:
public abstract class LoggerTemplate {
protected String filename ="log/";
protected File logfile;
protected FileWriter fw;
public void writeToLog(String message) {
if(fw != null) {
try {
message = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MM-hh:mm").format(new Date()) + " " + message;
fw.write(message);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
The concrete sub-classes will implement rest of the logic in their constructor, ie one of them:
public class JitterBufferLogger extends LoggerTemplate {
public JitterBufferLogger() {
super();
filename += new SimpleDateFormat("yyyyddMMhhmm'.log'").format(new Date());
if(!new File("log/").exists())
new File("log").mkdir();
logfile = new File(filename);
try {
logfile.createNewFile();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
try {
fw = new FileWriter(logfile);
} catch (IOException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
But when I debug I can see that when calling the writeToLog for a specific logger, it jumps into the LoggerTemplate method, and therefore fw and logfile are null. So it's not working.
Isn't it supposed to work or do I just mess something a bit up and should go into weekend ;-)
JitterBufferLogger? Probably stdout goes to an unexpected location and you missed the stacktraces. Also, 'log/.20122012.log' (the slash) is not a valid filename - see logfile.createNewFile(filename).File parentDirin your base class and have the base class constructor populate it and create the dir. Then in the concrete class donew File(super.parentDir, fileName)orsuper.parentDir.createNewFile(fileName)