Performance of Boost Python

Question

I working on a project where I'm experimenting with boost python. When looking into how to organize my python interface I ran into a comment that asserted there are performance concerns with boost python. Is there any actual concern with it's performance?

In this case I'm working with a large project and we want to expose some of it to python. I'm finding that boost python makes it easy to expose the classes I already have. So I would prefer to stick with boost python's methods of exposing classes because it's so easy. Unless someone has an alternative that is just as easy to use and performant.

GeorgT · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-05 15:30:45Z

2

We are using boost::python for the integration of a large computer vision library into a highly configurable software package for researchers in other fields. We didn´t ran into concerns nor problems up to know. However, we did not do any comparison tests recently.

answered Sep 5, 2012 at 15:30

GeorgT

1701 silver badge10 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

jbosch · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-06 01:30:14Z

2

If your use case requires a lot of calls back and forth between Python and C++ in a tight loop, then Boost.Python may be a performance concern, at least relative to hand-rolled wrappers that use the Python C-API directly. It's a lot harder to guess whether it would perform any worse than something similarly user-friendly, like SWIG.

But the biggest performance question is whether you can avoid that sort of back and forth - an API that can avoid crossing the C++/Python barrier repeatedly will generally always perform better than one that does, regardless of what library or wrapper tool you use. Most often that means moving loops from Python into C++, and avoiding Python callbacks and especially Python-to-C++ type conversions within those loops.

answered Sep 6, 2012 at 1:30

jbosch

9916 silver badges9 bronze badges

1 Comment

user7111260 Over a year ago

Agree, it seems there is a large overhead when calling C++ code from python with boost::python

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Performance of Boost Python

2 Answers 2

Comments

1 Comment

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

Comments

1 Comment

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related