Proper way to set timeout on a method in Java

Question

I've looked over some existing answers here on SO and I've used Future in combination with ExecutorService to set timeout with TimeUnit to method.

But I'm trying to set timeout on a method inside my service implementation meaning that caller class is consuming interface.

So I'd like to avoid implementing callable in my service implementation, because I want this method to get executed in the same Thread.

Is there other way to set timeout or simulate timeout on a given method ?

What do you mean by "timeout"? If you mean kill the operation after some period of time, you can't do that without running the operation in a separate thread. (You can, of course, embed timer checks in loops in the code, and, eg, throw an exception when the time limit is exceeded, but this requires significant "cooperation" on the part of the "suspect" code.) — Hot Licks
– Hot Licks, Commented Oct 3, 2012 at 21:42
hi Hot Licks that is exactly what I meant, sorry for poor problem description. — Gandalf StormCrow
– Gandalf StormCrow, Commented Oct 3, 2012 at 21:47

Tomasz Nurkiewicz · Accepted Answer · 2012-10-04 07:48:19Z

1

You can have a look at TimeLimiter from guava that can take any class and produce time-limited proxy. But it still uses thread pool internally to wait for Future (at least the default SimpleTimeLimiter implementation).

I you want to run method in the same thread, you must have another thread to interrupt it after given timeout. And interruption won't always work. Thus thread pool and Future is the only way.

edited Oct 4, 2012 at 7:48

answered Oct 3, 2012 at 21:43

Tomasz Nurkiewicz

342k72 gold badges713 silver badges680 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

Gandalf StormCrow Over a year ago

hi Tomasz Nurkiewicz I'm not sure why I said that I don't want it to run in the separate thread. I said this because this code is already executing as part of the runnable object in several threads and I meant not to add more complexity. But as long as it "looks" like same thread it's good enough for me, because I'm creating sequential process (which is run by many threads at the same time).

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Proper way to set timeout on a method in Java

1 Answer 1

1 Comment

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

1 Comment

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related