Node.js customize require function globally

Question

I am trying to modify require like this

require = function (path) {
    try {
        return module.require(path);
    } catch (err) {
        console.log(path)
    }
}

However, scope of this modification is only in the current module. I want to modify it globally, so every module that is required by this module will also get the same copy of require function.

Basically, I want to catch SyntaxError to know which file has problem. I can't seem to find any other alternative. If I put module.require in try/catch block, I'll be able to get the file name which caused SyntaxError.

Salman · Accepted Answer · 2013-11-12 04:29:40Z

9

I managed to solve it by modifying prototype function require of Module class. I put this in the main script and its available to all the required modules.

var pathModule = require('path');
var assert = require('assert').ok;

module.constructor.prototype.require = function (path) {
    var self = this;
    assert(typeof path === 'string', 'path must be a string');
    assert(path, 'missing path');

    try {
        return self.constructor._load(path, self);
    } catch (err) {
        // if module not found, we have nothing to do, simply throw it back.
        if (err.code === 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND') {
            throw err;
        }
        // resolve the path to get absolute path
        path = pathModule.resolve(__dirname, path)

        // Write to log or whatever
        console.log('Error in file: ' + path);
    }
}

answered Nov 12, 2013 at 4:29

Salman

9,4676 gold badges42 silver badges74 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

oligofren Over a year ago

this seemed promising, but it did not work for me on Node 8. I put the modification in a mod.js and used Mocha's --require option to load it before all test files, but alas ...

Craig Hicks Over a year ago

As shown in nodejs documentation the nodejs spec includes functions require.resolve(...) and require.resolve.paths(...). Don't know if those get used internally or not.

Community · Accepted Answer · 2017-05-23 10:30:35Z

0

Why don't you use a try-catch block inside your code and once an error occurs to check the stack trace. Check out these links

edited May 23, 2017 at 10:30

CommunityBot

11 silver badge

answered Nov 11, 2013 at 10:40

Krasimir

13.6k4 gold badges45 silver badges58 bronze badges

3 Comments

Salman Over a year ago

I can't use a try catch everywhere I require a module. and tell users to follow the same. That's why I want to make it transparent to the users.

Krasimir Over a year ago

What about nodejs.org/api/process.html#process_event_uncaughtexception. You may put this in your main module and catch all those errors, which are normally send to the console.

Salman Over a year ago

uncaughtException is not much helpful when you want to catch SyntaxError as it won't give you the filename which has the error. Node just prints the filename with a snippet of the erroneous file. It doesn't give that file in the stacktrace.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Node.js customize require function globally

2 Answers 2

2 Comments

3 Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

2 Comments

3 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related